Al Gore Catch-22

May 23rd, 2007 by ROBERT STEIN

In today’s New York Times, Maureen Dowd says “leading Republicans and Bush insiders think a Gore-Obama ticket would be unbeatable.” But there is a catch.

If the former Vice-President had been the way he is today-—outspoken, self-confident, at times a bit confrontational–he might have won the 2000 election by an indisputable margin.

But today’s Al Gore isn’t running for President. If he decided to go for it next year, would he revert to the wonky version of 2000?

That question is raised by the mega-attention of the past week–a cover story in Time, reviews of his new book, “The Assault on Reason,” and endless press about how he has “fallen out of love with politics.”

“Free to Be Al Gore” is the theme of an E. J. Dionne column in yesterday’s Washington Post: “It’s entertaining to talk to Gore these days because he’s so clearly enjoying himself…(H)e did not speak as if there were focus-grouped sentences dancing around in his head. Nor did he worry about saying things that some consultant would fret about for weeks afterward.”

Pick a point of view about the New Gore, and the New York Times has it. Today Dowd says, “He is so fixed on not seeming like a presidential flirt that he risks coming across as a bit of a righteous tease.”

In the Times’ Sunday Magazine, James Traub concludes Gore has attained “prophetic status” by “acting as he could not, or would not, as a candidate–saying precisely what he believes, and saying it with clarity, passion, intellectual mastery and even, sometimes, wit.”

A Times review of “The Assault on Reason” says it “shows a fiery, throw-caution-to-the winds Al Gore, who, whether or not he runs for the White House again, has decided to lay it all on the line with a blistering assessment of the Bush administration and the state of public discourse in America at this ‘fateful juncture’ in history.”

In Time Magazine, Gore sums himself up: “There’s no question I’m freed up. I don’t want to suggest that it’s impossible to be free and authentic within the political process, but it’s obviously harder. Another person might be better at it than I was…Obama is rising because he is talking about politics in a way that feels fresh to people …

I came through all of that and I guess I changed. And now it is easier for me to just let it fly. It’s like they say: What doesn’t kill me makes me stronger.”

In politics, as in singles bars, hard-to-get can be sexy–up to a point. Over the coming months, Gore will be forced to resolve his ambivalence.

If he goes for it, he will have to give up overeating just as Obama has stopped smoking. As a team, they might be inspiring in more ways than one.

Cross posted on my own blog.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, May 23rd, 2007 at 8:00 am and is filed under Barack Obama, Media, Al Gore, George W. Bush, Democrats, Politics, 2008 Elections, Books. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

7 responses about “Al Gore Catch-22”

  1. Entropy said:

    Gore had his chance - its time for others to step up.

  2. kritter said:

    There’s no law that says he can’t try again- look at Nixon and Reagan- both ran several times before eventually winning. But Gore’s problem has always been that he’s a better policymaker than politician- he hates campaigning but likes to work out policy details. Also, I’m sure he does not want to go up against the Clinton behemoth. Still, I hope he does run, because he genuinely cares more about the country and the environment than power for its own sake.

  3. casualobserver said:

    Sorry to disappoint you, kritter………..

    But on “Good Morning America,” Gore told ABC’s Diane Sawyer that a presidential run isn’t on his radar.
    “I’m not a candidate,” he said. “I’m not pondering it, I’m not focused on that… I’m focused on how to solve the climate crisis and in order to solve the climate crisis I’m convinced we will have to fix the cracks in the foundation of democracy.”

    http://www.abcnews.go.com/GMA/Politics/story?id=3195443&page=1

  4. Joe Gandelman said:

    He may actually mean it. People are so used to politicians saying one thing and saying another. But what if he truly feels liberated from all of the expected verbal ballets that people who run for public office are expected to perform. How many politicians really get to say what they feel? I’m maybe one of the few who takes Gore at his word (but then I have been known to be dumb before, as many readers of this site remind me in emails…)

  5. kritter said:

    Well, I saw him on LKL, and he wouldn’t rule it out either. I actually think that if Hillary weren’t running, he would get in in a heartbeat. It would be awkward to go against the Clintons and he knows the primary fight might be a killer.

    Yes, his first concern is the environment, but his book was written in the recognition that he can’t get anywhere because of the political environment. That to me, indicates he still is thinking about it, because he knows as president he could have the power to make some of the changes he’s convinced are necessary. Until then, he’s just another head of jsut another interest group.

  6. jjc said:

    It’s been almost 20 years since Gore first ran for President. Not sure how that relates to now, but thought I’d mention it.

    I think Gore gets in if both Edwards and Obama falter somewhat but Hillary is not clearly in command. Maybe Wesley Clark talks him into running with Clark’s visible support, or maybe even Obama does–I believe almost all his support would transfer fairly seamlessly to Gore.

    Gore doesn’t have to want to run yet. I think he’ll want a fresh wind to his back, and it’s hardly out of the question that such could occur.

  7. Michael van der Galien said:

    Robert: an honor to have you on board sir. Question: do you happen to be related to Gertrude Stein?

McCain Don’t Likey Romney »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.