It’s increasingly clear that the Clinton campaign’s negativity is so intense that it will eventually be compared to the infamous negative number Republicans George Bush and Karl Rove played on Senator John McCain in the 2000 South Carolina primary — but the Clinton campaign’s negativity is unrelenting….and now offers a new twist:
In the latest melody in the medley of personal attack politics, a Clinton supporter is putting out information alleging rival Senator Barack Obama is linked to 70s radicals…but saying this is how the REPUBLICANS will do it. It’s the perfect cover story for deniability. We’re not saying it, this is what the Republicans will say.
From The Huffington Post (which seems to be breaking campaign news that’s giving both sides headaches these days):
A high-ranking labor supporter of Hillary Clinton is distributing to union leaders and to Democratic strategists a document detailing the radical activities of Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, two former members of the ’70s group the Weather Underground, who decades later, in Chicago, crossed paths with Barack Obama.
The document – a three-page emailed essay by Rick Sloan, communications director for the International Association of Machinists as Aerospace Workers (IAMAW) — takes both literary and political license to outline what Sloan believes would be the thrust of a hypothetical Republican campaign against Obama focusing on his tangential connection to Ayers and Dohrn.
The goal of the essay appears to be to discredit Obama as the prospective Democratic presidential nominee.
Indeed: seldom in the recent primary histories of either party has there been such a steady, unceasing campaign to raise the negatives of an opposing candidate (and one who is likely to get the nomination). All primaries have some of it. But the Clinton campaign is now seemingly COMPRISED of it. (Even Hillary Clinton’s argument to voters in Pennsylvania is negative today: she’s telling them not to “throw away your vote” on primary day…which is not exactly a long argument as to why voters should vote for her and what positive things she can do for the country).
But there is more to the HP piece:
The most damaging new material cited by Sloan appears in a link to an FBI Freedom of Information web site — where a viewer can examine hundreds of pages of a study of the Weather Underground and its leaders, written in 1976 by the Chicago FBI office, just at the group was disintegrating at the end of the Vietnam War.
Sloan contends that the purpose of his document is to outline what he conjectures will be the tactics of Republican operative Karl Rove, an informal adviser to John McCain’s campaign, if Obama is the nominee. The title of Sloan’s paper is: “What Is Rove Up To?”
Actually, there are no signs that Rove is up to to anything on this issue…yet.
But it’s clear the Clinton campaign is reducing his workload in months to come.
Rove may be able to take two weeks of vacation time in Palm Springs if they keep doing his legwork for him.
For the Republican perspective, be sure to read Ed Morrissey. Here’s a small part of what he writes:
We could see this coming for months, and the results should be delicious. Huffington Post writer Tom Edsall reveals that a union has developed an extensive and detailed attack on Barack Obama’s connection with William Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, the former Weather Underground terrorists, while at the same time deriding it as “McCarthyism”. How do they square that circle? They wrap it into a cautionary message that asks, “What will Karl do?”:
Well, this is really convenient, isn’t it? Not only can they indulge in what they call McCarthyism, they can blame their bete noir Karl Rove for it before he even utters a word. This frees up both Democratic contenders to fling as much mud at each other under the WWKD concept. We can call it pre-emptive McCarthyism, another great concept in campaigning from the people who brought us the vast right-wing conspiracy.
Then Morrissey writes:
Meanwhile, the real Karl Rove can sit on the sidelines while the Democrats diminish themselves at the speed of light in an orgy of hypocrisy. That’s what this really is — a way to campaign hard while blaming others for the damage it causes, as hypocritical an effort as one will ever see in politics.
I never thought I’d use that dreaded word, but:
Ditto.
Joe Gandelman is a former fulltime journalist who freelanced in India, Spain, Bangladesh and Cypress writing for publications such as the Christian Science Monitor and Newsweek. He also did radio reports from Madrid for NPR’s All Things Considered. He has worked on two U.S. newspapers and quit the news biz in 1990 to go into entertainment. He also has written for The Week and several online publications, did a column for Cagle Cartoons Syndicate and has appeared on CNN.