Hillary Clinton Speaks on Her Plan to End the Iraq War Responsibly
March 17th, 2008 by DAMOZEL
I have excerpted some of her key points and arguments, many of which are already in the process of being twisted and taken out of context by her opponents. Here’s what she actually said in what I thought was an eloquent and crucial speech.
Hillary began by expressing what many Democrats believe: the surge can’t be said to be working unless its purpose is being realized: political reconciliation within the Iraqi government. Otherwise, we are simply polic[ing Iraq’s civil war." If elected, she said:
I will start by facing the conditions on the ground in Iraq as they
are, not as we hope or wish them to be. President Bush points to the reduction in violence in Iraq last year and claims the surge is working. Now, I applaud any decrease in violence. That is always good news. But the point of the surge was to give the Iraqis the time and space for political reconciliation. Yet today, the Iraqi government has failed to provide basic services for its citizens. They have yet to pass legislation ensuring the equitable distribution of oil revenues, yet even to pass a law setting the date of provincial elections. Corruption and dysfunction is rampant….
Pointing out that neither Petraeus nor the Iraqis are satisfied with the progress toward reconciliation, Hillary argued that it is not feasible for the US to keep troops in Iraq indefinitely simply to keep down the violence. We simply cannot afford to police Iraq’s civil war without mounting threats "to our national security, our economy, and our standing in the world."(GWU speech)
Category: Ronald Reagan, Refugees, Bush Administration, Withdrawal, Gen. Petraeus, General David Petraeus, Our Hometown, Maryland, Taliban, Primaries, Newsweek Blogitics, Surge, Democratic Party, Iraq, Afghanistan, War, Political Cartoons, War On Terror, Democrats, Sectarian Violence, Terrorism, Hillary Clinton, George W. Bush, 2008 Elections |











