By his veto, President Bush broadcasts loudly to the world that a bill forbidding water boarding torture of human beings, and other egregious harms to prisoners held without habeas corpus, shall, by his fiat, continue.
Mr. Bush argues that ‘we,’ not he, cannot be having any humane treatment of prisoners. That ‘we’ must be able to use torture ‘techniques.’ That we “can’t, can’t can’t” remove even one item, e.g., water boarding, from the torture menu.
It almost makes a soul wish for an effective “Woody Allen moment” ….in one of Allen’s films, the cultural icon Marshall McLuhan steps out from behind a movie standee to support Woody Allen’s argument against an insufferable boor who was patronizing Allen.
Would that Harry Truman would step out from behind the people of the United States and tell Mr. Bush that “The buck stops with you pal… what’s this ‘we’ business? The ‘say so,’ yes or no, is with no one else in such heavy matters, but with you.”
What else continues to be missing in the President’s monologue, is the ever insistent voice of ‘the people’ who strenuously object to treating human beings inhumanely. The No! to torture, is not because “the people” are dunces. It is because they are developed in strategic and common sense consciousness of various kinds. (I’ve written about one kind here too, at The National Catholic Reporter newspaper online.)
Couple the President’s shocking ‘written in stone’ support for ongoing torture with an item from the President in a different category altogether. This week President Bush claimed he is too tightly scheduled to accompany John McCain on any part of Senator McCain’s campaign for the presidency. The President is very busy.
In Governments, Prevarication Can Become A Chronic Pathology if There are Also Only Cardboard Checks and Balances
If there is no brave and insightful soul to lead an inquiry– not first into what governance people are doing exactly, but first into why checks and balances are not in place, what happened to each of them, who are the clogs in the spillways, who are the destroyers of the sieves and sifters that ordinarily catch what ought not be allowed to pass.
In a way, it is not surprising that government videos, audio tapes, emails have utterly disappeared from the field of evidence in agencies whose SOLE job is to gather evidence. With only cardboard people conducting flat, un-insightful cardboard inquiries, we get paper dust, instead of documents.
And more prevarications.
In legends, behind the young prevaricator, there usually stands a far older one who is instructing the younger one.
I continue to think that George Bush is not the magneto of all these egregious matters. He is only the voice that has been persuaded by others, not of his family, but extero-family, likely a cadre of several old men whose wing mates are a cadre of ambitious and aging men… several layers deep.
There are old folk tales in my family about how the scheming, foolish and greedy parents of a young woman or young man whisper a polluted advice to their young. They instruct their young to be insincere in order to deceive an individual, a village, a stranger, or a kingdom… and the motive is to gain power, or a leg up, or some other boon or advantage not won squarely.
But in the tales, this prevarication backfires in time. The leitmotifs of those stories, including Bluebeard and Beauty and The Beast, Eros and Psyche too, display that this lying, manipulating, positioning and not telling all the truth… causes their young to nearly be killed, or to be abandoned by the forces of good, or to die for the parents’ lies.
Think of how wars are made and waged when based on a lie. Whether it be Von Klauschwitz, or Patton, or Ike or other military strategists, it is said the worst thing an army can have, a people can have, a kingdom can have… is an inept leader in wartime… one who does not understand that his own reckless, grandstanding behaviors, and his ‘secret behaviors that are not secret,’ will only make the enemy stronger.
The underlying points of the old tales I know from my family are the similar to the premises found about human nature– and lack of humanity– in Sun Tzu’s The Art of War…. Such as, imagining one will be attacked and to attempt to torment all persons whom one imagines to have attack on their minds, is the weakest position.
Why? Because it enrages the army of the enemy when those deceits and devastations are reckoned. It does not defeat the enemy and save human life. Instead, it creates a stronger, wilder, more heartbroken-crazed enemy, and the loss of life on both sides, will thereby be far more enormous.
There is a falsity for certain about allowing the CIA to torture while loudly proclaiming the military is constrained from doing so—as though this is an acceptable compromise. ‘Not my brother, but the cousin’s brother of my brother will do the deed,’ therefore we are exonerated. The ill machination in all that is clear.
There’s may be an additional trope in Mr. Bush not wanting to pass legislation against torture: Rewarding others for loyalty is Mr. Bush’s most significant psychological feature. It is the way he binds people to himself. Protecting those who would likely be prosecuted if the new bill hadn’t been vetoed is far more likely his companion motive.
Thus, the ‘we’ in “we need to have torture techniques’ is not we, as in “we the people.” It is ‘we,’ as in Mr. Bush’s friends whom he wants to protect.
The pattern may continue in petty ways as well. Is there a falsity in President Bush’s claim that he’s too busy to squire McCain? Bush has taken more days of vacation than any other president. He doesn’t seem to be ‘too busy.’ It appears far more so that he simply doesn’t want to dutch McCain’s chances of winning various groups that don’t care for Mr. Bush, and wont care, given this latest veto on a bill… a veto that appears to extend the will of ‘his people’ and kicks to the side of the road again, the will of “the people” of the United States.
The questions that stand out to me over and over, go something like this:
–How dumb do those who advise the president think “we, the people” really are?
–What is the thinking of those who advise and enact, that they put forth statements which seem fashioned to be crafty and cunning?
–How is it they do not fear their contrivances will be seen through by even the most astute rabbit in the kingdom?
— How much can a president look down his nose at the will of the majority of people– as brought to him by the people’s representatives– and still continuously create outrageous distortions and think we cannot put 2 and 2 together?
Two and two is still four last I looked, even though some in Mr. Bush’s administration seem to repeat over and over that the sum of 2 and 2 is Me me me. And, We we we. But, never ever, “You, our people….”