Congresswoman Jean Schmidt: The Freddy Krueger of Cincinnati-Area Politics

November 4th, 2008
By MARK DANIELS

Print Print

It looks like Jean Schmidt has dodged another bullet. In 2004, Schmidt lost her Republican primary bid for the Ohio State Senate. The loss was a source of glee for many of her fellow Republican activists in Clermont County, the mostly suburban, somewhat-rural county east of Cincinnati’s Hamilton County. In spite of having been a township trustee and a State Representative from the county’s most populous areas, she lost the county in that race. Her political career was seen as dead.

But then Rob Portman, congressman from Ohio’s Second District, was made federal budget director by President Bush, opening his seat up to a special election. Schmidt jumped into the race, the only candidate in a Republican primary field who was not from Hamilton County. A Republican has a huge registration advantage in the district, President Bush won it with 65 to 70% of the vote in his two runs for the White House, and Portman won the district with similar majorities.

Schmidt ultimately won both the primary and the special election. But the partisan conservative Republican has managed to upset or offend a number of her constituents. That began with her November, 2005, attack on Marine veteran John Murtha on the House floor.

The attack created a firestorm, even inciting a Saturday Night Live skit. I lived in the county at the time. It’s a place where military service is highly honored and large numbers of its young people join the service. Many veterans were highly-critical of Schmidt while others backed her, only underscoring what has been a constant of Schmidt’s career: She is highly-polarizing. The Democrats played on that in TV ads like this one this year:

In both of the election cycles since her special election year in 2005, Jean Schmidt has been targeted by the Democrats. Her first opponent was a rather voluble Iraq War vet who opposed the war. Two years ago, her opponent was a local physician, Dr. Victoria Wulsin, who ran a credible campaign.

That led Democrats and Republicans to expect a 2008 rematch in which Wulsin’s prospects looked good.

But then a third party candidate entered the race. David Krikorian appears to have been well-financed.

So far, according to the Cincinnati Enquirer web site, 275 of the 719 precincts in the district have reported. It has to be encouraging to Schmidt and massively disappointing to Wulsin. Schmidt has 47% of the vote, Wulsin has 36%, and Krikorian, 17%.

No doubt, if this early trend holds, Second District Democrats will blame Krikorian for Wulsin’s loss.

And once again, Jean Schmidt, who has risen from the dead three times in the past three years, has dodged defeat. She can rightly be called the Freddy Krueger of Cincinnati-area politics.

[This has been cross-posted on my personal blog.]




This entry was posted on Tuesday, November 4th, 2008 at 10:58 pm and is filed under Newsweek Blogitics, Ohio, Congress, 2008 Elections, Movies, Politics, Entertainment. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.