About the Convention Tonight, and Against “Conventional” Wisdom

August 28th, 2008
By DORIAN DE WIND

Print Print

Tonight, Barack Obama —half black, half white—steps up to the podium in Denver to accept the nomination of the Democratic Party for President of The United States.

Whether by coincidence or not, his acceptance speech comes exactly 45 years to the day after Martin Luther King Jr. gave his momentous, unforgettable “I Have a Dream” speech.

Yesterday, here in Texas, we celebrated the day when another civil rights champion, President Lyndon Baines Johnson, would have celebrated his 100th birthday.

What a confluence of circumstances. What a perfect political and civil rights storm.

No doubt, Barack Obama will address Martin Luther King’s “Dream”: how much of it has come true, but also how much still awaits to be realized.

A little over a month ago, we celebrated another anniversary. July 26 marked the 60th anniversary of the end of segregation in our armed forces. On that occasion, I wrote a post “Two Anniversaries, Two Presidential Candidates’ Positions,” commenting on another “coincidence” of anniversaries: the aforementioned 60th anniversary and the fact that it was 15 years since President Bill Clinton signed a law that came to be known as “Don’t Ask, Don’t tell,” a policy that prohibits openly gay individuals from serving in the military.

At the commemoration of the 60th anniversary of the integration of our armed forces, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said:

Our commemoration today of the racial integration of the armed forces makes us reflect on how far we have come toward living up to our founding ideals and yet how much remains to be done.

and,

We must make sure the American military continues to be a great engine of progress and equality.

Since then, in my posts, I have urged Mr. Gates and other U.S. leaders to put their money where their mouth is when it comes to the civil rights of our gay and lesbian military members.

Since then, some have commented that one should “cool it,” have patience on this issue; that “nobody wants this shoved down our throats…”, or “can’t you wait until January?” Some consider such “don’t rock the boat” attitude as safe, conventional wisdom.

Perhaps. But, also perhaps, if Martin Luther King, Cesar Chavez, Rosa Parks, and so many others had listened to the same “conventional wisdom,” and “cooled it,” “had patience,” or “waited until January,” we might still be waiting for parts of that “Dream” to come true.

So, let me go against “Conventional Wisdom” and urge Barack Obama to, tonight, address not only the broad issue of discrimination based on sexual orientation, but also reaffirm his previous statement of policy with regard to “Don’t ask, Don’t tell.”:

I agree with former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff John Shalikashvili and other military experts that we need to repeal the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy. I will work with military leaders to repeal the current policy and ensure it helps accomplish our national defense goals.

Then we “can wait until January” 09.




This entry was posted on Thursday, August 28th, 2008 at 3:08 pm and is filed under Newsweek Blogitics, Bigotry, Change, Gay Rights, Civil Rights Roundup, Black/African-American, Civil Liberties, Military, Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Robert Gates, 2008 Elections. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 2 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    Another Anniversary Today:

    http://www.johnmccain.com/McCainReport/Read.asp...

    Flashback: 40 Years Ago Today, Bill Ayers Arrested at DNC

    For those Democrats who are too young to have a proper appreciation of their party's history, which likely includes most of Senator Obama's supporters, we direct your attention to a memorable moment in DNC history that shows how the current nominee really is connected to the party's past as much as its future.

    It was forty years ago today that Barack Obama friend and political ally, and unrepentant terrorists, William Ayers was arrested while protesting the DNC proceedings. William Ayers set no bombs that day, but he was only working his way up from petty criminal to domestic terrorist. And of course this was long before Barack Obama and he struck up the friendship that would lead Ayers to launch Obama's political career at his house.

    Still, the McCain campaign would take this opportunity to remind voters that those responsible for the violence in 1968 have since been incorporated into the party they once protested, and have been revered even by the likes of Barack Obama, and this despite the failure, in the case of Ayers, to ever apologize for the violence he committed against the American people.
    • ^
    • v
    Desperation is the name of the game for the republican campaign. They can't campaign on their list of accomplishments because the very few are so vastly outweighed by their blunders. Gotta go negative, distort, mischaracterize, create fear, etc. That will be the neo-GOP legacy. Maybe after Ayers they can pretend to find an ELE asteroid they can try and pin on Obama.
 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.