In Defense of Lobbyists

May 21st, 2008
By PETE ABEL, Managing Editor

Print Print

Ben Smith has an interesting item on Congressman-and-Obama-booster Adam Smith’s tip-toe defense of former lobbyists.*

Rep. Smith makes a good point, and we should all (including Sen. Obama) be duly cautious about painting all lobbyists with the same brush. Qualitatively and quanititatively, “lobby” is not a four-letter word — nor is it a reliable indicator of evil. For every Jack Abramoff, there are two or more ethical, civil, decent people who ply their trade lobbying.

Trust me: I’ve met and worked with several of them. In fact, seasoned staff in the House and Senate will confirm that the best lobbyists are not those who take a scorched-earth approach to pushing their clients’ interests. To the contrary, the best are those who are willing to tell their clients, “No,” as in “No, you’re not going to get everything you want, so let’s get realistic and talk about compromise, about what you can live without.”

Moreover, while I’m not a full-time lobbyist and never have been, part of my charge (in the job for which I actually earn a paycheck) is communicating our company’s perspective to elected officials at the local, state, and federal levels. In a sense, when doing that, I’m “lobbying.” Similarly, in a volunteer capacity, I’ve lobbied for the interests of families who deal with Tourette Syndrome, for lesser restrictions on embryonic stem-cell research, for campaign finance reform, and so on. In short, any time that any of us contact an elected official to make a point, we’re lobbyists.

For all these reasons, Senator Obama would be well advised to follow Rep. Smith’s lead, making sure he appropriately qualifies his remarks on lobbyists and former lobbyists, separating the worthwhile, honorable, freedom-of-speech practice and practitioners (paid and unpaid) from those who are purely in the game to manipulate the system and enrich themselves, no matter what the cost. Otherwise, the good Senator from Illinois may very well discover either that he’s facing a shortage of qualified staff or that his words have returned to haunt him.

—————-

* To the best of my knowledge, Ben and Adam are not related.




This entry was posted on Wednesday, May 21st, 2008 at 4:11 pm and is filed under Newsweek Blogitics, Barack Obama. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 1 Comment

    • ^
    • v
    It's not the lobbyists that cause the problem per se. It's the suspicions aroused about what they get in return for giving time, advice or money to an election campaign. Suspicions may be totally groundless, as you point out, but they can't be easlly assuaged. That's why the appearenace of impropriety is often stressed nearly as much as actual mpropritety. when a code of conduct is being developed.

    It's not about being fair or unfair to certain individuals. It's about preserving the honor of an office, or, like in this case, trust in elections and politics.
 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.