« George Bush’s “Appeasement” Gift to Barack Obama (UPDATED)
Cindy’s Money »



Walking the Line, Sign of Hope

May 16th, 2008
By PETE ABEL, Managing Editor

Print Print

In the first category, Jonathan Martin catches McCain and Obama walking the line, threading the needle, choosing their words carefully with respect to yesterday’s California Supreme Court ruling on gay marriage. I look forward to the day when this matter is resolved and is no longer an issue that’s of relevance to any campaign. (And yes, I’m pro civil marriage.)

In the second category, Ben Smith catches Obama discouraging a powerful 527. I find that a very good sign and a strong proof point to add to the scorecard on the Senator’s commitment to a “new kind of politics.”



This entry was posted on Friday, May 16th, 2008 at 9:16 am and is filed under Newsweek Blogitics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 3 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    The 527 move is very interesting. It sounds like Obama is financially stable enough that he wants to keep on message as much as possible, and not be sidetracked by ill-advised 527 ads. This could be one of the most important party infrastructure moves of the season in fact.
    • ^
    • v
    "Financially stable enough" -- that may be the critical factor. Good point.
    • ^
    • v
    I don't think "financially stable" is the reason, rather I think pacatrue hits it on the head when he says Obama wants to stay on message. Doesn't matter that Obama is financially stable, because he could send the surrogate 527s (which are not subject to public financing laws) to do his dirty work and lower the political discourse. Staying on message is much more important and elevates the discussion.

    Also IMO this will benefit Obama and any charges that McCain (or "McCain's" 527s) might level at Obama about public financing. Remember one of the controversies surrounding public financing is determining whether or not the candidates can control the 527s. In other words the candidates won't get around public financing limits by using the 527s as proxies to do the dirty work.

    If Obama is able to keep the "Dems'" 527s under control, but McCain can not keep the "Republican" 527s attack ads under control and they attack Obama with Swift Boat type ads, then Obama can claim that the Dems are running a cleaner race and he has shown that he can control the "Dems'" 527s attacks on McCain, whereas McCain can not control the "Republican" 527s attacks on Obama.

    In as much as the 527s play an important role in the public financing debate it will be important for Obama to show he can control them. If McCain can not control the 527s that will benefit him, then Obama can claim that McCain is not serious about public financing and that McCain can get around any public financing arrangements/laws by having the 527s, which are not subject to public financing, run these vicious ads.

    Also the "financially stable" aspect is suspect because even when candidates have lots of money (self financed, as an example) it doesn't necessarily help them. Money does talk, but it's not everything. The message is much more important and being able to raise money is an indication of how well a candidate is doing with his message.

    I would say that being tough on 527s because of financial stability or considerations is like the tail wagging the dog.

    Stay on message! (And eliminate distractions.)
 
close Reblog this comment
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
blog comments powered by Disqus

« George Bush’s “Appeasement” Gift to Barack Obama (UPDATED)
Cindy’s Money »


By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.