The Compromising Of ABC News?

May 2nd, 2008
By JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

Print Print

We don’t usually link to Drudge Report because so many of his original news items have later proven to be inaccurate. But this Drudge item is backed up with info from elsewhere — and it could mean ABC News will be thrust into Democratic primary controversy once again.

Here’s his lead:

Just hours before the Indiana and North Carolina presidential primaries, ABC NEWS has offered to air a ‘town hall’ meeting with Hillary Clinton — to be hosted by former Clinton staffer George Stephanopoulos!

Embracing and racing through a brave new era of journalism, it is not clear if ABCNEWS will inform viewers of Stephanopoulos’s past employment.

Stephanopoulos helped run Mr. Clinton’s first presidential election campaign and acted as his press secretary and advisor on policy and strategy before joining ABC NEWS.

An executive at a rival network mocked, “We look forward to ABC holding the next town hall meeting with President Bush, hosted by Karl Rove!”

ABC will air the hour-long Hillary forum live from Indianapolis on Sunday.

There’s a lot more so go the link and read it all.

Drudge also notes that Clinton’s prime rival Senator Barack Obama will appear on Sunday on NBC’s “Meet The Press,” where he will be grilled by Tim Russert.

Some websites have called this the dueling Sunday showdown between the two — but these two events and the issues raised by them are NOT the same.

1. Clinton has paid for televised Town Hall type events in the past. ABC is basically giving her a chunk of time to take questions from voters. Did ABC offer Obama the same thing? If not, the event is setting up the network — rightfully or wrongfully — to charges that it is doing the show to bolster Clinton. If these charges are made, they are most likely “wrongfully,” since despite what partisans on all sides think, most news directors don’t rub their hands with glee and try to figure out ways to undermine one candidate and promote another.

2. Stephanopoulos was bitterly criticized by many progressives and by some mainstream media staffers for co-moderating a Clinton-Obama Pennsylvania debate where the first half seemed to be focused largely on putting Obama on the spot about political and process questions and talk radio subjects. Stephanopoulos was accused of using a question proposed by conservative talker Sean Hannity. Progressives also pointed to his past employment with Clinton and suggested he was working with her to undermine Obama. Again, rightfully or wrongfully, this will further undermine perceptions of him, particularly if he doesn’t throw unquestionable hardball questions at Clinton as tough, persistent and assertive as the ones he threw at Obama.

3. ABC News as a network could come off OK if Stephanopoulos conducts an event that isn’t the equivalent of giving Clinton a free Town Hall meeting that she would have otherwise paid for. This will be a difficult task: a) Obama partisans will want to see Stephanopoulos giving Clinton the same treatment he gave Obama or they’ll say it was biased (and they will use a very tough standard — in some cases wanting blatant bias against Clinton), b) unless Obama was offered the same format to be televised before the closely-fought primaries, some progressives will say the omission proved ABC was favoring one candidate.

4. Meet The Press is not the same as a Town Hall. That show is a traditional TV talking heads Sunday morning interview program. The guest is in a studio — not interacting with members of the public. Russert has the reputation of taking politicians apart on his show and while many (including Clinton) have survived and thrived, and few except Vice President Dick Cheney have viewed Russert and his show as a p.r. or easy-spin vehicle.

The Bottom Line: After the debate, Stephanopoulos was highly controversial, suspect in Obama quarters and basically-damaged goods. ABC would have been better served if it had arranged for another ABC reporter to conduct its Town Hall.

By its choice of a controversial host who many believe is not above the Democratic primary fray, ABC’s Town Hall will be closely watched — but perhaps in ways ABC and Stephanopoulos did not originally have in mind.




This entry was posted on Friday, May 2nd, 2008 at 8:51 am and is filed under Newsweek Blogitics, MSM, Democratic Party, Primaries, North Carolina, ABC News, Indiana, News, TV News, Media Criticism, 2008 Elections, Democrats, Hillary Clinton, Media, Barack Obama, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.