On Obama and Wright

April 29th, 2008 by DENNIS SANDERS

In response to Pete Abel’s post this morning concerning Senator Obama, I wrote the following response:

While I wouldn’t say it as brash as RickMoran did, I have to agree somewhat with his statements. It does seem a bit elitist to say that Obama is being brought down by “simple-minded” folks. For one thing, it’s too early to say his campaign is toast. Politics can change and he still could turn this whole Wright affair around. Also, you seem to be implying when you say there is too much fear and bias, that this has to do with the fact the Obama is black. I’m not going to pretend that race and racism isn’t present, but again, I think it’s wrong to assume that any criticism of Obama or Wright for that matter, means one is a bigot.

As for not holding Obama to the same standard, I would say that there has also been an argument that the press and others have given Obama a pass and have not been really being as critical as they should be concerning a potential presidential candidate. (Witness the ABC staffers who wrote a letter to Charlie Gibson and George Stephanopolos for their questioning of Obama.)

Part of me sees another thing happening here: sometimes people have withheld judgment of a black person because of fear of being labeled a racist when sometimes judgment is necessary. There is a difference between being a bigot and asking some tough questions.

Finally, I think there is a case to be made about the associations of political candidates. While knowing someone doesn’t mean you agree with them, it could provide a window into how this person will operate as a president. If this were John McCain and it was about some association with a known homophobic pastor, we would be asking questions and rightly so. Just because Obama and his pastor are black doesn’t mean they get a pass.

I have to add that there is something worrisome about stating the public might not be ready for the junior Senator from Illinois.

It seems to say that if Americans aren’t warming to his message, then it must be because of his race. I’m not going to pretend that it might be a factor, but people could be against him for other reasons that are valid. Just because people don’t like Hillary Clinton doesn’t make them sexist, they might not want her to be president for valid reasons. If we can treat Hillary like a normal human being, than we can do the same for Obama.

One more thing about Rev. Wright: since his campaign began, Obama has highlighted his faith in the campaign. Like the GOP has done, Obama has made sure that his religion is up front and center. When you do that, you are going to invite questions because you made something about your life public. The problem with politicians of all stripes is that they think they can have it both ways: to talk about their faith and make it a hallmark of their campaign, but yet keep it from public scrutiny. Sorry, but it doesn’t work that way.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, April 29th, 2008 at 11:49 am and is filed under Newsweek Blogitics, Barack Obama. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Obama’s line has been crossed »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.