Campaign Finance: If it's broke, then fix it.

Campaign Finance: If it’s broke, then fix it.

March 5th, 2008
By PAUL SILVER

In Campaign-Finance Breakdown Mr. Bradley Smith, a former Federal Election Commission commissioner, and now chairman of the Center for Competitive Politics argues for the termination of public financing of campaigns. The essence of the argument is that since the influence of money can’t be controlled, we shouldn’t even try.

But while he sees the futility of trying to manage the role of money in politics, I see that we have no choice but to promote the impartiality, pragmatism and open mindedness of our representatives and judges. As global wealth increases, and concentrates, it becomes an almost insignificant investment to sway local public policy to benefit special interests over the wellbeing of average citizens. There needs to be an alternative for the typical candidate who choses to be independent. And that alternative is the public funding of competitive campaigns. So that the candidate can get enough money to equal the marketing reach and frequency of an opponent funded by a relatively few special interests.

Evolving circumstances will frustrate the mechanics of this funding. But where Mr. Smith prefers to give up, I encourage us to stay vigilant and keep up the good fight. Almost all of the leaks and weaknesses in past regulations can be addressed with refinements or even new approaches. What we may have learned over the past few years is that rather than limit how money can be spent it may be as simple as making sure a candidate has sufficient funds to match those promoting his opponents. Perhaps this reconciles the concerns for freedom of speech. Additionally it may be that a more appropriate source of the funds for public campaigns would be a tax on the media businesses that are the ultimate recipients of the campaign expenditures. After all, the public owns the airwaves and only licenses them to the private sector.

When we ponder that the cost of American government at all levels may be over $4 Trillion each year, then a few billion to promote the objectivity of representatives, while diminishing temptation to squander public funds, seems like a wise investment.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, March 5th, 2008 at 7:46 pm and is filed under Newsweek Blogitics, Campaign Reform. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

« Obama-Hillary Nails in the Coffin

Will McCain Gamble to Forge a New Majority? Or Will He Buy Into Rovian Minimalism? »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.