Clinton Campaign Shakeup: Patti Solis Doyle Gone As Campaign Manager

February 10th, 2008
By JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief


Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager Patti Solis Doyle has quit/been fired (choose the version you believe) and will be replaced by longtime Clinton adviser Maggie Williams — in a shake-up the campaign insists is not a really shake-up but one that has in fact been hinted at in some news reports ever since Mrs. Clinton lost in Iowa.

And with the string of losses this weekend to prime rival Senator Barack Obama, coupled with news that the Maine caucuses are not a political cakewalk for Mrs. Clinton as many had predicted (UPDATE: Obama won the Maine caucuses), it’s more clear that ever that either the timing of this is an incredible, amazing, stunning coincidence — or that Solis Doyle is being shoved out of her campaign manager’s office door.

The best report on this that puts it into context comes from the Wall Street Journal:

Hillary Clinton campaign manager Patti Solis Doyle stepped down today as the candidate braces for more loses in the five states and the District of Columbia that hold contests this month.

So the Clinton campaign is shoring up its resources and fortifying its forces for bad news to come. MORE:

The campaign announced today that Solis Doyle would be replaced by Maggie Williams, a senior adviser to Clinton and a former chief of staff to the first lady. Solis Doyle will stay on as an adviser and will travel with Clinton.

In an email sent to campaign staff, Solis Doyle said she was stepping down for personal reasons. “This has already been the longest presidential campaign in the history of our nation, and one that has required enormous sacrifices from all of us and our families,” Solis Doyle, 46, said in the email that was forwarded to The Wall Street Journal.

On Saturday, Clinton lost to rival Barack Obama in Louisiana, Nebraska, Washington state and the Virgin Islands. He is expected to win all three contests on Tuesday in what is known as the “Potomac Primary”
when Maryland, Virginia and Washington, D.C., hold contests. This would bring his total to 22 states, if he also wins in Maine, compared to Clinton’s 12 states.

The two candidates are practically tied when it comes to delegates. As of yesterday, Clinton had 1,125 delegates compared to 1,087 for Obama, according to an Associated Press tally.

Keep in mind this as well: Much media and weblog coverage has been pegged to the idea that if the two campaigns are even, Mrs. Clinton could be way ahead in the Super-delegates and possibly get the nomination if — under the party’s present operative rules — they cast their votes for Hillary Clinton. But if Obama keeps winning and pulls ahead (a) it may not be as easy to win with Super-delegates (b) Super-delegates (many of them politicians who are elected to office) will be under incredible pressure to vote as their constituents have voted in the primaries.
As the Journal notes, it isn’t just the string of losses that has been stunning. It’s the MARGIN of Obama’s wins over Clinton that have to be giving the Clinton campaign fits:

Obama didn’t just win the three states that voted on Saturday, he won by huge margins. In Nebraska, 68% of caucus-goers picked Obama, compared to 32% for Clinton. The Illinois senator won by a similar margin in Washington state.

The losses have been attributed to early mistakes within the campaign. After early warnings to avoid campaigning in Iowa all together, Solis Doyle led a push to campaign hard in the state. Clinton came out with a third-place finish after pouring millions of dollars and nearly a year of efforts into winning in Iowa.

The loss cost her valuable resources and momentum that some political pundits say are still hurting her campaign.

Clinton advisers denied speculation that Solis Doyle’s resignation could signal a broader shakeup within the campaign. “Maggie and Patti and will work very closely together,” said campaign spokesman Mo Elleithee. “We expect a seamless transition.”

The latter is the typical take on staff shake-ups and major corporate regime changes that anyone who has worked for a company or big corporation has heard coming from higher-ups to mask a..shake-up. The bottom line is: given the TIMING of this, it’s clear that the Clinton camp felt something had to be done ASAP.

Steve Clemons suggests one reason why this may be happening now:

Maybe this is part of the reason:

Maine numbers so far:

And it looks like yet another Obama caucus blowout:

No hard numbers yet, but Obama wins Houlton by about 20 votes.

Obama wins Rockport, carrying 8 delegates to Hillary’s 3.
Obama takes Fryeburg 67 to 17
Obama takes York 414 to 225
Clinton takes Rumford 52 to 37
Clinton takes Dixfield 16 to 14
Clinton takes Mexico 27 16
Clinton takes Byron 1 to 0
Obama takes Hanover 6 to 2
Obama takes Gardiner 129 47 with 2 uncommitted
Clinton takes Old Orchard Beach 134 to 128
Obama takes Hampden 179 to 70
Obama takes Wilton 87 to 30
Obama takes Cape Elizabeth 550 to 217
Obama takes Deer Island 6 to 1
Obama takes Winterport 7 to 4
Obama takes Machiasport 2 delegates to 1O
Obama takes Ellsworth 184 to 100
Obama takes Bristol 7 to 2
Obama takes Bangor (District 15) 16 to 8
Obama takes Presque Isle 63 to 60
Obama takes Stonington 48 to 24
Obama takes Scarborough 401 to 283

Yes, We Can!

Here’s Kos’ own take on it:

The knives inside the Clinton campaign were out for Patty Solis Doyle, and her enemies finally succeeded…I liked Patty. It’s rare to have high ranking Latinos anywhere in politics, and rarer still to see Latinas in positions of real power and influence. Reports have suggested she was too much of a micromanager, and discontent over her leadership has leaked into news reports ever since Clinton’s Iowa defeat. Once Williams joined the campaign, this transition appeared to be inevitable. Williams was Clinton’s chief of staff when she was First Lady.

Michelle Malkin has another twist on it:

It was just a little over a month ago that Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager, open borders activist and Norman Hsu guest Patti Solis Doyle, was enjoying the spotlight and basking in glory. The self-styled “Latina Queena” was profiled in the Wall Street Journal as Hill’s soul sister and primary foe of the “white boys” in the Clinton camp.

Well, the Latina Queena’s politics of identity ain’t working so well for Hill. And now it’s so long, Solis Doyle. Who’s back in? Another moldy oldie from the Clinton closet: Maggie Williams….If you can’t remember Maggie Williams….She was knee-deep in the Johnny Chung scandal.

My DD’s Jonathan Singer (who is a former TMV co-blogger) put it into perspective this way:

Steve Clemons uses the term “fired” to describe this action, though I have not yet seen that term in other reports (which tend to put the emphasis of the story on Solis Doyle “stepping down” or “quitting”).

Either way, this is pretty big news. Campaigns that believe they’re moving in all cylinders in the right direction don’t generally see shakeups at their highest ranks — particularly not in the middle of balloting. That is not to say that this news necessarily spells trouble within the Clinton campaign. Nevertheless, with little more than three weeks until Texas and Ohio hold their presidential primaries — nominating contests that now appear key to Clinton’s strategy of slowing down Barack Obama’s momentum out of the mid- to late-February states and ultimately to ensure that she wins the Democratic nomination — if the campaign is spending as much time dealing with new internal hierarchies and plans as it is organizing, it could be problematic for team Clinton.

And, indeed, no matter what twist you give it, it is not the sign of a campaign that is going super smoothly but of a campaign that feels there’s a need for some changes rather quickly.

To follow the latest blog reaction CLICK HERE.

This entry was posted on Sunday, February 10th, 2008 at 3:46 pm and is filed under Newsweek Blogitics, Primaries, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, 2008 Elections, Democrats, Politics. Both comments and pings are currently closed.


Chavez Threatens U.S. Oil Cutoff After Legal Victory By ExxonMobil »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.