Why American Blacks May Be Obama’s Great Problem

January 19th, 2008
By WILLIAM KERN

Print Print

What is it about Barack Obama that makes it so hard for American Blacks to get behind him - even those with a similar backgrounds? According to this analysis of his candidacy from South Africa’s Business Day, ‘It may well be that it’s Black America and not America in general, that isn’t yet ready for a Black president.’

By Jacob Dlamini

January 12, 2008

South Africa - Business Day - Home Page (English)

I FIRST heard of Barack Hussein Obama about three years ago. My informant was a young American whose family was a part of the Black political establishment in the U.S. The family originally came from the U.S. south and could speak directly of slave ancestors and cotton pickers on both maternal and paternal sides.

My informant’s parents, whose roots in the Black political elite could be traced to the Black church and the civil rights movement, were proud members of the generation of Black Americans who benefited from the success of the civil rights movement of the late 1950s. These successes included the gradual dismantling of Jim Crow discrimination , the meaningful extension of the franchise to Black voters, especially in the South, the desegregation of schools and universities, and of course, the advent of affirmative action.

And my informant had done better than his parents, attending for his education, private schools and Ivy League institutions. He had, on the face of it, gone beyond the Black political establishment and become a member of America’s integrated political elite.

Yet my friend saw himself as an outsider. He saw himself as a civil rights campaigner still fighting old battles.

He was very suspicious of Obama, the young senator from Illinois. Obama was not a senator then, but was starting to make waves within political circles. My informant said he was automatically suspicious of any Black politician who looked like he was the darling of the White political establishment. “What’s the catch!” my informant demanded. “Why do they like him so?”

My informant’s suspicions made no sense to me. First, both he and Obama were from a similar class background and both had gone to Ivy League universities. Obama might have had a White mother, but he proudly identified himself as Black; Obama might not have had direct and immediate experience of segregation, but he proudly embraced the civil rights movement and acknowledged his debt to it; he might not have known the life of a poor Black boy growing up in an inner-city project, but upon graduation he threw himself into community work.

None of this mattered to my informant. Obama wasn’t Black enough for him. He wasn’t militant enough. In fact, my informant suggested, any Black politician who made White folks feel comfortable should be distrusted. It didn’t seem to matter that Black America, which constitutes only about 13 percent of the American population, can only succeed politically through coalitions with other interest groups and communities. It didn’t seem to register that Obama looked like the sort of politician who could help build those coalitions.

READ THE REST OF THIS ARTICLE AND MUCH MORE ABOUT THE WORLD’S REACTION TO OBAMA AT WORLDMEETS.US




This entry was posted on Saturday, January 19th, 2008 at 11:35 am and is filed under Newsweek Blogitics, Primaries, Democratic Party, Barack Obama, 2008 Elections, George W. Bush, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 1 Comment

    • ^
    • v
    From the post: "Yet my friend saw himself as an outsider. He saw himself as a civil rights campaigner still fighting old battles.

    He was very suspicious of Obama, the young senator from Illinois. Obama was not a senator then, but was starting to make waves within political circles. My informant said he was automatically suspicious of any Black politician who looked like he was the darling of the White political establishment. “What’s the catch!” my informant demanded. “Why do they like him so?”' And this, "Obama wasn’t Black enough for him. He wasn’t militant enough. In fact, my informant suggested, any Black politician who made White folks feel comfortable should be distrusted."

    In my opinion black politicians (like the informant in the posting) who are militant want to make whites feel uncomfortable will not become President. Jesse Jackson, while he does necessary work in fighting for the civil rights of blacks, will never be elected President.

    I think the country needs someone like Obama to lead as President. Obama may not have grown up in the black ghettos, but this is exactly why he is not an angry black man. Obama embraces his background, has been on the end of racial biases, and as community organizer has seen first hand the crippling effects of racism on the black community. But he's not militant in his attitudes and approach. In fact he's the opposite- he tries to pull people together, whether they are white, black or brown, Democrat, Republican, Independent, or other.... Unlike the black militant politicians whose demands are basically for their own community, Obama rightly understands that we're all in this together and if the country is going to address the problems of the black community (which makes up about 12% of the population) then he can't alienate the rest of the population.

    America needs a leader who has the courage to stand up and say, "This is our country and we must work together for the benefit of all of us." The black militants are so in your face that it's difficult to work with them and their demands.

    One of the reasons I support Obama is that the problems of African-Americans really do need to be addressed. I'm ashamed of the way my country treats African-Americans and I think we can do better. I feel that of all the candidates, Obama cares most about the good of the people and he can work to close the huge rifts amongst the various groups in America. I truly believe that for America to succeed we all need to succeed. I believe that anyone who believes in freedom and equality (especially the religious folks) should address the social ills of our country. I'm a staunch believer in liberalism- that everyone should have equal opportunity and individual rights. For me, Obama is the politician who can best make this happen. All other candidates either owe big corporations too much or use divisiveness as a wedge against people to gain power. In order for America to "go to the next level" we need someone like Obama- a politician who brings people together.
 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.