Around The Campaign 2008 Sphere

January 19th, 2008
By JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief


_AE338DE6_CB43_4CB1_91FE_336D0B60D97F_.gif

NOTE: Another in our series of special Election 2008 editions of our popular Around The Sphere link-fest where we offer readers links to weblogs of differing viewpoints — and give you our comments on some of the political issues raised. This version will only contain election-related links. It will appear several times a week until Election Day.

The Great Confederate Flag Controversy Surfaces In South Carolina (Again) and lo and behold it’s again being used against Arizona Senator John McCain who’s losing ground to former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee who — coincidentally — is coming out in favor of it waving there (apparently forever). Booker Rising, a site that bills itself as a “news site for black moderates and black conservatives’ but must be required reading for everyone, writes this:

However, I’ll take on Mr. Huckabee’s statement and say it again: “Your” flag should be the American flag, not the traitorous Confederate flag. “Southern pride” here translates into racist Southern pride, for these symbols represent slavery, degradation, and un-Americanism. Most blacks are Southerners, yet very few are down with the flag. To flag lovers: you lost the Civil War - get over it already! The Civil War killed 617,000 folks, and the South illegally tried to secede from the United States. This flag is no different than the Nazi flag - that of a vanquished totalitarian entity that USA thankfully put out to pasture. Yet supporters want to fly this traitorous flag equal to that of the U.S. flag over a state capitol.

Read it all.

Yes On The Political Scene In South Carolina it is very un-pretty indeed. But some folks who would have never gotten an invitation to my bar mitzvah (or attended if they were invited) do have their favorites and unfavorites.

Why Are Some People More Than Ever This Year Progressive Democrats? The All Spin Zone’s Richard Blair has an extensive MUST-READ POST HERE. Here is just a tiny part of it but read it all:

I’m angry. I’m angry with the business climate that has upended my life and that of millions of others like me. I’m angry that I’m good enough at what I do that I’m the “go-to” guy when there’s a steaming pile of business shit that someone else has left for me to clean up, but there’s no one to back me up when I have a less than stellar day at the office. I’m angry that at this point in my life I’m locked into a fairly dead-end position because of the paycheck, but more importantly, benefits that I can’t (again, at this point of my life) afford to be without.

In the past year, I’ve seen one of my closest business associates hang it up because it just wasn’t worth it anymore - he bailed out early when he had the opportunity, even as he was somewhat unsure of his financial future. Another (15 years younger than me) had a heart attack just before Christmas. He was back at his desk last week. He’ll never make it to retirement. Another is opting for early retirement in March rather than spend another minute with her nose stuck to the grind stone.

We suspect there is a lot of that going around.

In Last Week”s Debate The Democratic Candidates Were Asked A Key Question and Senator Barack Obama scored — and Senators Hillary Clinton and John Edwards failed. Q: What was the question? A: See teacher Betsy Newmark for the answer.

Can This Be The End Of Rudy Giuliani? The ever-stylish and highly individualistic liberal The Heretik thinks so. And here’s a small part of what he says:

The collapse of the Giuliani myth is one of the most fascinating storylines of the season so far. The mayor’s gamble that the most traumatic national event of our time would also be the most political event of our time seems to have been a bad bet. George W. Bush was the 9/11 candidate and there may be no more to say about it at this point. Despite Giuliani’s decision not to contest Michigan, his three percent performance there was more than just a disappointing footnote: It’s a big hint. In any successful Giuliani scenario, Michigan was crucial. If the economically strapped progeny of the 1980s Reagan Democrats can’t grasp the charms of tough-talking, tax-cutting Rudy Giuliani, no one will.

Our view? If RG succeeds then he’ll be seen as a masterful strategist. If he flops (as looks likely) his (bad) decision will be talked about for years and will suggest that He Who Wants To Be President Better Enter The Fray Early (something Fred Thompson –who might start lining up his acting gigs ASAP — found out). It’s truly a pity because Giuliani does have some top notch people working with him. It’s also a pity that he used 911 so much as a mantra that many Americans tired of that meditation and clearly moved on to other options.

Can You Tell Democrats From Republicans And Republicans From Democrats Anymore? Jon Swift argues that the 2008 Presidential campaign shows we’re in an era of “political cross dressers.”

Does Hillary Clinton Have A “Democracy Problem?” Pajamas Media’s Daniel Koffler thinks she does and points to the court case in Nevada by the teacher’s union (that has officials who support her) trying to keep a pro-Obama union from having its members vote at their work sites.

Predictably enough, a backlash against the Clinton operation has begun. The Culinary Workers Union is stepping up the ardor of its support for Obama, distributing flyers throughout Nevada directly accusing the Clinton campaign of attempting a tactical disenfranchisement of its members. Union members are of course free to disregard their leadership’s endorsements, but one could hardly imagine a more effective way to galvanize Obama’s support among the rank-and-file than to alert them to Clinton’s efforts to take their vote away. Furthermore, left-leaning pundits and blogs have been training Democrats for years now to recognize even the slightest appearance of voter-suppression, and they are virtually unanimous in their condemnation of the lawsuit. Hence the Clinton tactics jeopardize many potential votes outside the union. Even John Kerry, who presumably still has some influence among Democrats, has taken a public swipe at the Clinton scheme.

Yet despite her apparent, sudden volte-face on voter rights, one could not fairly accuse Hillary Clinton of acting inconsistently or without principle. In Nevada, as in Iowa, New Hampshire, and throughout the United States, Hillary Clinton stands unwaveringly for the inalienable right of all citizens to vote for her.

Even so, polls show Clinton winning today in Nevada (just watch TMV for election results).

Has A Certain Issue Become Lost In The 2008 Presidential race? Arianna Huffington thinks so. It’s a teenie-weenie issue called “Iraq.” Her take on it is HERE.




This entry was posted on Saturday, January 19th, 2008 at 11:40 am and is filed under Newsweek Blogitics, Around The Sphere, 2008 Elections, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 1 Comment

Trackbacks

close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus

Update: Canada removes U.S., Israel from potential torturer/abuser list »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.