Will Democrat Bill Richardson Drop Out Of Presidential Race?

January 10th, 2008
By JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

Print Print

richardson.jpg

Actually, the headline should ask WHEN will Democratic Governor Bill Richardson drop out of the Presidential race? One news report says he will. Then another carries a denial by his campaign organization, noting that he’ll announce a decision Thursday.

But it’s all a matter of time. Richardson was the quintessential “dream resume” candidate — someone who had done so many impressive things, been so popular with his home turf voters, a top Hispanic politician…why, he was BOUND to be a contender.

Plus, he was (on most but not all issues) a centrist, which set him apart from a lot of the Democratic Party presidential pack. But, above all, in the end Richardson seemed to be a national political underachiever.

The latest report says he’ll make an announcement Thursday. It’s highly-unlikely (but anything is possible in politics this year) that he’ll call a press conference to announce that he’s not dropping out and that nothing has changed:

New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson will announce Thursday that he is ending his campaign for the presidency, sources inside the Richardson campaign confirmed to NBC News on Wednesday.

Sources told The Associated Press and NBC News about the withdrawal plan on condition of anonymity in advance of the governor’s announcement.

The Richardson campaign would not comment on the governor’s decision, reached after a meeting with his top advisers Wednesday in New Mexico.

Keep in mind that most Presidential candidates stay in the race as long as they have to — until it turns out they run out of money and can’t raise any more. That could be the case with Richardson.

The question will continue to be asked: how could a candidate who seemed to have such a solid resume, great success as politician in his home state, and such high polling numbers from his New Mexico constituents fizzle so dramatically on the national campaign scene? There may be several reasons:

(1) He was prone to make gaffes. Some major, some minor. At times he seemed to have chronic foot-in-mouth disease.

(2) The camera didn’t like him. The camera adds weight to a person (I KNOW…I was on MSNBC two years ago to talk about blogs and the camera made five-foot-1, 145 # me look like six-foot-three 250 # me). A shot of his face looked like a double-chin convention. If his TV impact was offset by other debating and solid qualities as an aspiring nominee, the TV factor could be overlooked. But it was not.

(3) He tended to sound like he was trying to get out as much of his resume in an answer as possible.

(4) His debate replies rambled and often went on too long. Senator Joe Biden got the reputation for being a chatterbox, but Richardson came in a close second at times.

(5) He was not one of the candidates who was a darling of the base and faced competition in the center from the candidacy of Hillary Clinton

So, if you add in his political positioning, performance as a candidate, and how he came across on TV (the method of selling the political package) you get a candidate who fell short of initial expectations and never took off on the national scene.

But even if he drops out, Richardson will be one of his party’s most valuable voices — and one of the country’s best governors.


SOME OTHER WEBLOG OPINION ON THIS STORY:

Pamela Leavey:

I never felt Richardson had much of a chance to be honest. So now the next speculation will be who Richardson will support in the race. He came to Clinton’s defense in the early debates and yet urged his supporters to support Obama as their 2nd choice in Iowa.

Richardson dropping out leaves the race between Clinton, Obama, Edwards and Kucinich;but Dennis Kucinich is another non starter. I said here recently to watch for Kucinich, regardless of how he fares in the voting booths and polls to hang on through to the convention as he did 4 years ago.

I don’t give John Edwards much more than through Mega Tuesday before he drops. This race has always been between 2 candidates, as very wise man (who’s been down this road before) told me last April.

Ed Morrissey:

Richardson never caught fire. Barack Obama’s entry into the race overshadowed his own, and Richardson never recovered. Instead of showing his experience, he only gained notoriety occasionally for his gaffes. He proved that a great resume doesn’t guarantee a great or even capable candidate. Why should the manner of his exit be any different?

Sundries Shack:

Aside from his debate performances, which really were embarrassing affairs, I hardly knew he was in the race. He certainly didn’t bring much more to the table than some pandering to the illegal immigrant lobby and a certain amount of rumpled ineptitude.

Pam’s House Blend:

He is a Dem with a killer resume, and was Hispanic to boot, showing that the Democrats have a deep, diverse and qualified field that makes the GOP candidates look pathetically retro. Alas, we know credentials in today’s elections aren’t what carry the day, which is too bad. Bill Richardson would be an fine VP pick.

Michelle Malkin:

But, but, but, didn’t you know that he was Energy Secretary and Governor of New Mexico!?!? Guess it didn’t matter. Don’t let the door hit you on the way out.

Daily Kos:

Richardson had by far the most impressive resume of anyone in the race. But people don’t vote for resumes, and he never came up with a compelling enough reason for people to vote for him instead of one of the big three. After last night’s performance, where he received only 5% of the vote, his fate was sealed.

Gun Toting Liberal:

Too bad in a way. The lack “experience level” we now have left in our remaining candidates has gone WAY DOWN as a result of Bill (”Billy Lopez”) Richardson’s choice to exit this race. Open borders and amnesty for illegal aliens? His biggest flaw, by FAR, and most likely the single largest reason I REFUSED to send him a red CENT.

On the other hand, when I look at what we’ve got left and I see Sir Hillary Rodham Clinton versus Sheriff John McCain, I see problems. HUGE problems.

--Sharon Cobb:

Richardson brought a significant amount of foreign affairs experience to the table, and made the bold suggestion that America stop dealing with Pakistan’s dictator Musharraf after Bhutto was murdered. Richardson was a very popular Governor of New Mexico, and by extension, in El Paso, which is 70 percent Hispanic. I suspect that we’ll be seeing Richardson in a cabinet position, whether it’s Obama or Clinton in the White House. There has been no official announcement, but I’m told it will happen later today

Marathon Pundit:

Richardson has an impressive resume: Diplomat, cabinet member, governor, and congressman, but his lack of charisma sunk his quest. He’ll appear on the media’s short list of vice presidential hopes, as he did four years ago, but I don’t see it happening. Hey, did you know he lacked charisma?

Max Redline:

Bill Richardson has apparently acknowledged the fact that he never stood a snowball’s chance and will be cutting out of the Democrat nomination race tomorrow. That’s a smart move. It keeps the race in focus. The Democrat race now boils down to a popularity contest among three grossly inexperienced contenders: Obama, Mrs. Bill Clinton, and Edwards. They have to decide whether to support an inexperienced black guy, an inexperienced white woman, or an inexperienced white ambulance-chaser.




This entry was posted on Thursday, January 10th, 2008 at 12:04 am and is filed under Newsweek Blogitics, Primaries, Bill Richardson, Democrats, 2008 Elections, Centrists, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 4 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    Its too bad that the Democrats seem to be obsessed with the cult of personality over real experience. OTOH, Richardson was mediocre in the debates and communicating an agenda is half the battle of the chief executive. His resume was the best out there of any candidate- but that was only on paper. I would have really liked to see him generate more interest.
    • ^
    • v
    Both parties value style over substance- Am's do it in all fields, not just politics, but Richardson absolutely sucks in debates. He has no charisma, and no charm. Nice guy, but wet fish.
    • ^
    • v
    I agree but its a shame, since the most effective governors--- Richardson, Mark Warner and Pataki often don't shine outside their home state. Do we want a rock star or a problem-solver? But he WAS very flat in the debates.
    • ^
    • v
    Yeah, Richardson was up against a charismatic rock star and a political princess who wants to be queen. Tough act. It's interesting that most of the comments on here about Richardson are positive- and the ones that are negative aren't filled with vitriol.

    I posted on here a few days ago that I thought Obama should choose Edwards as his VP- they would make a good match. But someone on here (I forget who) had suggested Richardson as Obama's VP. The more I thought about it the more sense it made- Obama's soaring rhetoric to pull the nation together as leader, matched with RIchardson's vast experience and knowledge of the country's political machine.

    Interestingly I get more excited about Richardson as VP than as Prez.

    I had expected Richardson to last through NV, but I guess not. I have always believed the race would boil down to Obama and Hillary, but I'm not ready to write Edwards off just yet. Look at how much the political landscape has changed within the last week. First Iowa changed everyone's assumptions, then NH did the same. I can't believe it was just a week ago that the Iowa caucasus happened!
 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.