Romney Stops The Bleeding?

January 7th, 2008
By JUSTIN GARDNER

Print Print

Looks like McCain is pretty much neck and neck with Romney. He pulls 34%, while Romney takes 29%. That’s pretty much right where the numbers were at before the caucuses. If Romney can tie McCain it will really help him make a “comeback” story.

From Zogby:

“Among Republicans, McCain leads Romney among Independents 43% to 26%, voters over 50, Moderates (50% to 20%), women (36% to 25%), and in the North (45% to 21%, effectively knocking out Paul). It is tied between Romney and McCain with Republicans and men. Romney leads among Conservatives and Very Conservative voters.”

Rasmussen has it neck and neck too.

John McCain is facing an unusual two-front challenge as he seeks to hang on to a narrow lead in New Hampshire’s Republican Presidential Primary. He is competing with Mitt Romney for votes in the Republican Primary. At the same time, he is competing with Barack Obama for Independent voters who can choose to vote in either the Republican or the Democratic Primary on Tuesday.

At the moment, he is losing ground to Obama which is causing him problems with Romney. On Friday, the Rasmussen Reports survey found that Independent voters were likely to make up 32% of the Republican Primary electorate. That dropped to 27% of Sunday. As a result, McCain’s lead over Romney has dipped to a statistically insignificant one-point advantage.

The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey in New Hampshire shows John McCain earning 32% of the vote while Mitt Romney attracts 31%.

Also, I wonder what that gang-up on Romney in Saturday’s debate will do to the polls by tomorrow morning? Even though it was a rough night for Mitt, I thought he handled himself well and came out of it looking like he could hold his own in a fight.

Last, but certainly not least, check out this video where New Hampshire voters laud praise on Mitt after Fox’s “forum” last night.

Unstoppable Mittmentum or just a mere blip on the Romdar?

(Crossposted from Donklephant)

(Photo courtesy of Reuters)




This entry was posted on Monday, January 7th, 2008 at 8:23 am and is filed under Newsweek Blogitics, Mitt Romney. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 5 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    Romney (like McCain) is being hyped prior to New Hampshire.

    This is dumb; let's wait until February 15 to see how these two gents do overall.

    Incidentally, is any of this hype by the GOP establishment in an attempt to get someone other than Huckabee into first place, or make Huck third, in New Hampshire and beyond?

    * * *

    "[Romney] is competing with Barack Obama for Independent voters"

    Hahahahahaha. A Dem Lite from Massachusetts who even smiles at you (cannot look serious because cannot be serious?) when trying to tell you solemnly, "I -- AM A CON-SER-VA-TIVE" thinks he can get the swing vote from Obama? (Or is he just banking on Clinton's eventually becoming the Dem nominee?)
    • ^
    • v
    Mitt "Heparin" Romney, may you cut yourself badly by making a stupid remark between now and the end of the primary tomorrow.
    • ^
    • v
    Just curious, DLS- You don't like Romney and can't stand Huckabee or Giuliani. Are you backing Thompson? You can tell me to MYOB if you like, LOL.
    • ^
    • v
    Actually, I like Hucklebee -- his Religious Right stuff doesn't threaten me, and his as-much-Dem-as-GOP record isn't as Demmie as the record of Clinton or Obama. However, I don't think Hucklebee is that strong (and in particular, the recent gaffes he made probably would disqualify him for Pres in the general election). I think Thompson's okay but too weak and too lackluster as a candidate, and he's going nowhere (not even emerging, at least not yet, as the leaders are rejected). I'm not a McCain fan but I wonder about having Hucklebee put into the VP slot and running with McCain.

    No, I don't like Romney and if anything I dislike Giuliani even more.

    Bottom line is, I think they're all weak on the GOP side and we're going to get a Dem in the White House next year, for as a non-liberal who will look at GOP candidates I'm not an impressed shopper so far other than I find Huckabee's manner pleasant.

    And if Obama is elected, I'm willing to give the guy a chance.
    • ^
    • v
    Wow, we actually agree on most of what you wrote. I Would never consider voting for Giuliani or Romney, but I actually personally like McCain and Huckabee. Thompson seems like a weaker, tired version of Reagan, with the charm but without the motivation for running.

    I really preferred Joe Biden, and would probably go for Clinton as my second choice on the Dem side. But, like you, I will give Obama the benefit of the doubt, since he seems to be trying to douse the partisan atmosphere in Washington, and is attracting so many Independents and even some in the GOP who are disgusted with their party.

    Its a strange election season, with many Democrats going over to Ron Paul. He even has some black support, which is strange, considering his past writings calling them animals.
 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.