Canada Crisis Part Deux

December 3rd, 2008
By PATRICK EDABURN

Print Print

The political antics continue north of the border as the incumbent Conservative government and the new opposition coalition battle for position in advance of the possible change of power next week.

Both sides have been releasing radio and TV ads to try and win support for their side. The battle is centered over a proposal by the government to drop public funding for the various political parties. Canadian PM Harper is reportedly considering suspending Parliament to avoid the scheduled December 8th vote.

Even though there were just elections a few months ago he could also try to call a new election. But the Canadian Governor General (who acts as the Queen’s agent) would have to approve the election request and could deny the move to an election since there would be a viable alternative to take over the government 

Needless to say this has sparked a lot of debate about what role a supposedly symbolic leader should plan in the political process.

Harper has also made an issue of the fact that the new coalition would include the Bloc Québécois. Since the Bloc is, at least in theory, dedicated to the secession of Quebec from Canada, there is a certain incongruity about having them be part of a government they want to withdraw from.

There is also controversy over the fact that Liberal leader Stephane Dion is at least as unpopular (if not more so) than Harper, so it would seem to be shifting from one bad situation to another.

At the same time, Harper certainly seems to have stolen the title of ‘worst use of an election victory’ from President Bush by crashing and burning in just seven weeks.




This entry was posted on Wednesday, December 3rd, 2008 at 3:52 am and is filed under At TMV, Quebec, Foreign Politics, Elections, 2008 Elections, Canada, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 2 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    Shouldn't that be, "Deux"?

    The Bloc Québécois won't be part of the coalition. They won't have any ministers in the new cabinet. But they promised not to bring down the government until at least June 2010. So the coalition would not include the Bloc, but it would govern with its backing.

    What I don't get is what Gilles Duceppe and the Bloc get out of this. Of course, they get rid of the awful Harper government that tried to hamstring the opposition, but they have a gun with no bullet in it. Are they planning to double-cross the Liberal/NDP coalition, and make unreasonable demands vis-à-vis Québec, threatening an election if they don't get what they want?

    It's going to be an interesting couple of years.
    • ^
    • v
    I echo JasperJava's question about the Bloc. I have read the Coalition Accord, and there is little there about what they would get from the agreement, as "national" issues are supposedly off the table.
    Clearly, there will be a price the left parties - the Liberals and the NDP - will have to pay to the separtists for their support. Devious dealings done by darkness.

    It has been fascinating following this story in the Canadian media online, as everyone comes out badly (with the curious exception of the separtists, who are honestly separtist).

    The Conservative Prime Minister has been revealed ... as Patrick says ... as a political cretin of a magnitude that boggles the mind. Even American Democrats, used to mocking Bush, would likely be amazed.
    This entire crisis seems to have been created by his own stupidity.

    The opposition left are grasping whores, and their candidate for Prime Minister ... Dion ... was rejected massively in the last election.
    By winning the lowest vote his party ever won in Canadian history, he will now be Prime MInister.

    Amazing. Just bizarro political theatre.
    Reminds me of Italy. Italians would appreciate this, I am sure, given their fondness for operatic politics.
 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.