« A Frustrated Centrism That Can Lurch Left or Right
The Irrelevant South »



Some Observations On Blogs

November 10th, 2008
By PATRICK EDABURN

Print Print

Now that we are slowly moving past Election 2008, I thought I might offer a few thoughts on my experiences with some of the bigger blogs. While I am sure some of you would disagree I think that my self proclaimed status as a slightly center right moderate is reasonable. As a result I tend to find myself in disagreement with both right and left blogs.

Of course as someone who loves to debate and argue, this is not a bad thing, and it has given me some interesting insights into the various blogs out there. While I visited a number of sites during the campaign I will use two of the bigger ones to illustrate my experience.

On the right I have chosen Redstate.com

For the left I am using Daily Kos

As you might imagine I frequently found myself shaking my head at some of the political views being expressed on both sites but to be fair I seldom found myself disappointed with the quality of the writing or of the analysis of the writers. While some (well many) of the responses to the posts were best ignored the general quality of the writing was excellent.

In addition both sites were also quite informative and had some excellent lines into not only both Presidential campaigns but also into news and information in general. If you wanted to know what was going on in the Obama campaign or with the Democrats, Kos often could tell you and the same was true of Red State with the Republicans and McCain. They also offered wonderful analysis of voting and polling patterns that helped you get an insight into the campaign.

Now having said these positive things I have to be fair and offer some critiques. Both sites have shown a disturbing intolerance for the other point of view. It’s not that I expect Kos to advocate the policies of the Bush administration or for Red State to back Obama. But especially with the comments section there was a strong lack of tolerance for even allowing the opposing view.

Both sides are eager to ‘purge’ their side of any moderates, though Kos was a bit more tolerant of moderates in the aspect of cold political calculations. But Kos is also a bit more likely to see comments about ‘banning the Republicans’ or such views. I have no problem with a site advocating their own point of view but I take exception with open contempt for the other side.

While both sites were fairly even in the good and the bad when it came to what I was reading there was a distinct difference when it came to my participating in the debate. Obviously when I went to the sites I was normally expressing disagreement with the point of view of the writers and other commenters. As a result I did not really expect to get much agreement or to see anyone change sides.

The responses to my comments were divided between the reasonable but opposed and the outwardly hostile (IE using language that I can’t repeat here). In this aspect Red State did a bit better than Kos. I did not keep details statistics but I would say on RS that the respectful responses outnumbered the hostile by a 60-40 margin while on Kos it was probably the reverse.

I don’t think that these figures should be taken to much against the web sites though since you don’t really have too much control over what the people say and when the debate got too heated the moderators were quick on both sites to respond.

However, the degree of censorship from the sites themselves were strikingly different. Both sites required registration to post comments.

When it came to Red State I was able to use the same account for as long as I wanted, at least from the point of view of the web masters. I did have to change once or twice because of trolls but otherwise my comments were not limited by the site.

By contrast, I had to re-register on Kos so many times I lost count. Once you started expressing a view that was not in line with the views of the web masters you were banned. I find this a very disturbing attitude for a site that quite properly condemned the Bush administration for their overreaching civil liberties restrictions.

Indeed, it makes me more concerned with them when I read about ‘banning dissent’ from a site that has already made its own policy of doing so.

Overall both sites are excellent, but I would prefer to see both have a little more respect for all points of view.



This entry was posted on Monday, November 10th, 2008 at 11:29 pm and is filed under At TMV, 2008 Elections, Politics, Blogging. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 6 Comments

 
close Reblog this comment
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
blog comments powered by Disqus

« A Frustrated Centrism That Can Lurch Left or Right
The Irrelevant South »


By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.