« Subsuming the Black
This Good Earth: August Edition »



Meet(ing) The Press

August 4th, 2008
By TONY CAMPBELL, TMV Columnist

Print Print

When the top news story of the day is that your campaign has snubbed the traveling press corps; your campaign is not having a good day. The McCain campaign has been under assault over the past day or so because of accessibility issues between their candidate and the national press traveling with McCain.

There is always a two-edged relationship between the President, presidential candidates (their staff) and the press. My colleague at Towson University, Dr. Martha Kumar, describes the dynamic between the candidate and the press as a combination of conflict and cooperation. The press needs the story and the candidate needs the press to deliver his/her message to the American people. The question, of course, is which version of the story actually reaches the eyes and ears of the people: the spin of the campaign or the bias of the reporter / editors.

The accessibility issue is very much at the heart of this story. There are only a few media events in a news cycle and the campaign wants to have as much control as possible over message content. On the other side, the traveling press corps has a limited window of opportunity (time and physical access) to file their stories. The issue of candidate access is even more limited on a bus tour because the press corps travels in a separate bus from the candidate.

In 2000, Karen Hughes was a master of maximizing the availability of press time with George W. Bush while limiting the possibility of negative exposure incidents. Media availabilities were kept to a minimum in favor of one-to-one interviews with local (non-traveling) reporters. The McCain campaign is trying to work out a similar strategy to utilize for the fall campaign.

The problem is that the Democratic Convention is a few weeks away and McCain has got to try to recover his media stature before the lights go on in Denver. McCain simply can not afford to be limited to responding to his own ads attacking Obama for the next three more weeks. My advice: resolve this quickly and allow more access to McCain by the traveling press; after all, it is better to have a happy gaggle of press folks in the bus behind you, instead of 60 angry press people pointing their cameras and microphones in your direction…hoping you slip up.



This entry was posted on Monday, August 4th, 2008 at 8:59 am and is filed under At TMV, Journalism, Newsweek Blogitics, Columnists, John McCain, 2008 Elections, Media, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 1 Comment

    • ^
    • v
    Tony C. said: "My advice: resolve this quickly and allow more access to McCain by the traveling press; after all, it is better to have a happy gaggle of press folks in the bus behind you, instead of 60 angry press people pointing their cameras and microphones in your direction…hoping you slip up."

    I disagree completely. The media are no longer McCain's friends, and placed him on the wrong footing on a daily basis throughout June and most of July.

    They will always be waiting for McCain to slip up . . . so why give them access to allow this?

    Bush/Rove recognized the hositlity of the press corps to the candidate, and dealt with it brilliantly. If McCain tries to repeat the endless bull sessions of the "Straight Talk Express" EVERYTHING he says until November will be "on the record".

    The temptation of a good "get" will be too much for a reporter to avoid.

    McCain is thus in lockdown mode, much like fellow motor-mouth Kerry in 2004. Rove was able to penetrate the bubble to get the "I was for it before I was against it" line in one of the most brilliant tactical successes of that campaign.

    McCain has to hope his "bubble" is more impenetrable than Kerry's.
 
close Reblog this comment
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
blog comments powered by Disqus

« Subsuming the Black
This Good Earth: August Edition »


By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.