
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Images telling tales with the help of a few words</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/9996/images-telling-tales-with-the-help-of-a-few-words/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/9996/images-telling-tales-with-the-help-of-a-few-words/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 03:36:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Ritter</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/9996/images-telling-tales-with-the-help-of-a-few-words/comment-page-1/#comment-40943</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Ritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 20:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2007/01/01/politics/images-telling-tales-with-the-help-of-a-few-words/#comment-40943</guid>
		<description>At the beginning of his presidency Bush passed a law allowing current or former presidents to block access to presidential papers. He got rid of the long-time WH historian. My guess is that he wanted to make sure that nothing embarassing surfaced about his presidency or that of his father.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the beginning of his presidency Bush passed a law allowing current or former presidents to block access to presidential papers. He got rid of the long-time WH historian. My guess is that he wanted to make sure that nothing embarassing surfaced about his presidency or that of his father.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PatHMV</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/9996/images-telling-tales-with-the-help-of-a-few-words/comment-page-1/#comment-40887</link>
		<dc:creator>PatHMV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 15:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2007/01/01/politics/images-telling-tales-with-the-help-of-a-few-words/#comment-40887</guid>
		<description>Like most posts that act as if President Bush is the worst president ever, this one is factually wrong. Mr. Kennerly was given unrestricted access to the President because he was employed by the White House as the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kennerly.com/about.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;official White House photographer&lt;/a&gt; during the Ford Administration. His photos were the official Administration photos. THAT is why he had unrestricted access.

President Bush also has an official White House photographer, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whitehouse.gov/ask/20030625.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Eric Draper&lt;/a&gt;, who has taken a great many candid shots of the President. The National Geographic reports on Mr. Draper&#039;s work &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/02/0218_050218_president.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. Mr. Draper has the same access to President Bush that Mr. Kennerly did to President Ford, and for the same reason... they both were employees of the President, and the President had and has ultimate authority over which pictures were released.

Many official White House photographer images are released only after the President leaves office. I don&#039;t know whether the picture of Ford and Rockefeller was released while Ford was President, or whether it was released after he left office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like most posts that act as if President Bush is the worst president ever, this one is factually wrong. Mr. Kennerly was given unrestricted access to the President because he was employed by the White House as the <a href="http://www.kennerly.com/about.php" rel="nofollow">official White House photographer</a> during the Ford Administration. His photos were the official Administration photos. THAT is why he had unrestricted access.</p>
<p>President Bush also has an official White House photographer, <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/ask/20030625.html" rel="nofollow">Eric Draper</a>, who has taken a great many candid shots of the President. The National Geographic reports on Mr. Draper&#8217;s work <a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/02/0218_050218_president.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>. Mr. Draper has the same access to President Bush that Mr. Kennerly did to President Ford, and for the same reason&#8230; they both were employees of the President, and the President had and has ultimate authority over which pictures were released.</p>
<p>Many official White House photographer images are released only after the President leaves office. I don&#8217;t know whether the picture of Ford and Rockefeller was released while Ford was President, or whether it was released after he left office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Silver</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/9996/images-telling-tales-with-the-help-of-a-few-words/comment-page-1/#comment-40882</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Silver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 15:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2007/01/01/politics/images-telling-tales-with-the-help-of-a-few-words/#comment-40882</guid>
		<description>It CAN happen here. And I am heartened by the reports I read that the Democrats and moderate Republicans want to address the overreactions of the government. However another major attack on the US could make the entire country more paranoid.

I also appreciate and respected Mr Ford even though I didn&#039;t always agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It CAN happen here. And I am heartened by the reports I read that the Democrats and moderate Republicans want to address the overreactions of the government. However another major attack on the US could make the entire country more paranoid.</p>
<p>I also appreciate and respected Mr Ford even though I didn&#8217;t always agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Ritter</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/9996/images-telling-tales-with-the-help-of-a-few-words/comment-page-1/#comment-40872</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Ritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 14:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2007/01/01/politics/images-telling-tales-with-the-help-of-a-few-words/#comment-40872</guid>
		<description>Ford was able to respond to criticism without getting hostile or defensive. He got along well with politicians from both parties. Ford fought hard for what he believed, but never sacrificed his integrity to get his way. While I personally disagreed with the Nixon pardon, I can really appreciate Ford&#039;s more open style---he was able to listen to differing points of view and believed in concensus style politics.

Bush, OTOH, becomes famously defensive when criticized, and has removed administrators with different points of view. He&#039;s relied on a small, select group of advisors from the start. When those advisors failed him, he put a cloak of secrecy around himself and the presidency. I see him as incompetent and tremendously insecure. Those qualities cause him to be secretive and prickly- although he does seem to enjoy jousting with the press.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ford was able to respond to criticism without getting hostile or defensive. He got along well with politicians from both parties. Ford fought hard for what he believed, but never sacrificed his integrity to get his way. While I personally disagreed with the Nixon pardon, I can really appreciate Ford&#8217;s more open style&#8212;he was able to listen to differing points of view and believed in concensus style politics.</p>
<p>Bush, OTOH, becomes famously defensive when criticized, and has removed administrators with different points of view. He&#8217;s relied on a small, select group of advisors from the start. When those advisors failed him, he put a cloak of secrecy around himself and the presidency. I see him as incompetent and tremendously insecure. Those qualities cause him to be secretive and prickly- although he does seem to enjoy jousting with the press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

