<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GOP and Survival of the Fittest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/9945/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/9945/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:43:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim S</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/9945/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/comment-page-1/#comment-40837</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 18:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2006/12/31/politics/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/#comment-40837</guid>
		<description>To have wanted Iraq to become a free and stable country is not a sign of Republican drone-hood. To think it&#039;s going to happen anytime in the near future after everything the Bush administration has screwed up &lt;b&gt;is&lt;/b&gt; a sign of mindless Republican drone-hood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To have wanted Iraq to become a free and stable country is not a sign of Republican drone-hood. To think it&#8217;s going to happen anytime in the near future after everything the Bush administration has screwed up <b>is</b> a sign of mindless Republican drone-hood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Ritter</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/9945/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/comment-page-1/#comment-40825</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Ritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 15:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2006/12/31/politics/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/#comment-40825</guid>
		<description>When you view the achievements of the Bush administration and the Republican-led 109th Congress, it becomes obvious that their leadership has benefitted the few, at the expense of the many. Bill Clinton often used the phrase &quot;benefitting the common good&quot; when campaigning for Democratic candidates last fall. Why? Because it drew voters&#039; attention to the fact that Republican policies had only benefitted a narrow core interest group of Republican donors. The rest of America was left blowing in the wind, as the government was largely dysfunctional for everyone else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you view the achievements of the Bush administration and the Republican-led 109th Congress, it becomes obvious that their leadership has benefitted the few, at the expense of the many. Bill Clinton often used the phrase &#8220;benefitting the common good&#8221; when campaigning for Democratic candidates last fall. Why? Because it drew voters&#8217; attention to the fact that Republican policies had only benefitted a narrow core interest group of Republican donors. The rest of America was left blowing in the wind, as the government was largely dysfunctional for everyone else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silver Prices &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Silver price - Red (err&#8230;Black/Silver) &#34;Spike&#34; Prototype</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/9945/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/comment-page-1/#comment-40824</link>
		<dc:creator>Silver Prices &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Silver price - Red (err&#8230;Black/Silver) &#34;Spike&#34; Prototype</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 13:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2006/12/31/politics/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/#comment-40824</guid>
		<description>[...] GOP and Survival of the Fittest [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GOP and Survival of the Fittest [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: superdestroyer</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/9945/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/comment-page-1/#comment-40823</link>
		<dc:creator>superdestroyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 12:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2006/12/31/politics/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/#comment-40823</guid>
		<description>If you look at the demographic statistics of &quot;blue&quot; states like New Jersey, Mass., or even Maryland, you will see that the middle class is moving out.  This is especially for the native born white middle class.  New Jersey may be a great place if you are rich or have a large family clan to help support you but for everybody else it is just too expensive to live there.  Why else do you think so many people moved to New Hampshire from Mass. or to North Carolina from New Jersey.  Do you see anyone from Georgia moving to New Jersey? NO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you look at the demographic statistics of &#8220;blue&#8221; states like New Jersey, Mass., or even Maryland, you will see that the middle class is moving out.  This is especially for the native born white middle class.  New Jersey may be a great place if you are rich or have a large family clan to help support you but for everybody else it is just too expensive to live there.  Why else do you think so many people moved to New Hampshire from Mass. or to North Carolina from New Jersey.  Do you see anyone from Georgia moving to New Jersey? NO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikef</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/9945/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/comment-page-1/#comment-40818</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 06:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2006/12/31/politics/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/#comment-40818</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If you look at states like DC, New Jersey, or Mass. it will not be very pleasant for most people.&lt;/i&gt;

Better standard of living, better medical care, better schools, better wages, lower crime rates. I&#039;ve lived in Democratic states like California and Massachusetts, and in Republican states like Tennessee and Texas. Massachusetts even beats all other states in having the lowest divorce rate. What horrors are you imagining?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If you look at states like DC, New Jersey, or Mass. it will not be very pleasant for most people.</i></p>
<p>Better standard of living, better medical care, better schools, better wages, lower crime rates. I&#8217;ve lived in Democratic states like California and Massachusetts, and in Republican states like Tennessee and Texas. Massachusetts even beats all other states in having the lowest divorce rate. What horrors are you imagining?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.W. Anderson</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/9945/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/comment-page-1/#comment-40809</link>
		<dc:creator>S.W. Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 02:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2006/12/31/politics/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/#comment-40809</guid>
		<description>CaseyL wrote:
&lt;i&gt;
&quot;The GOPâ€™s crowning accomplishment is undermining the entire concept of government that works for the greater good of the countryâ€™s citizens. In no area of policy or legislation did the &#039;common prosperity and general welfare&#039; weigh at all with them.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Bullseye!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CaseyL wrote:<br />
<i><br />
&#8220;The GOPâ€™s crowning accomplishment is undermining the entire concept of government that works for the greater good of the countryâ€™s citizens. In no area of policy or legislation did the &#8216;common prosperity and general welfare&#8217; weigh at all with them.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Bullseye!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CaseyL</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/9945/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/comment-page-1/#comment-40808</link>
		<dc:creator>CaseyL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 02:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2006/12/31/politics/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/#comment-40808</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If you look at states like DC, New Jersey, or Mass. it will not be very pleasant for most people.&lt;/i&gt;

DC isn&#039;t a &quot;state&quot;: it has no representation in Congress, and that&#039;s a big part of the problem.  

As for MA and NJ, what&#039;s so lousy about those states?

As for California... it has the 5th biggest economy in the world.  I don&#039;t see how being a Democratic state has hurt them.

When you look at the quality of life and relative prosperity of &quot;blue&quot; v. &quot;red&quot; states, it&#039;s obvious the blue do better.  Why is that?

What can the GOP offer?  To use corporate-speak, what added value does it give to the country to justify supporting it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If you look at states like DC, New Jersey, or Mass. it will not be very pleasant for most people.</i></p>
<p>DC isn&#8217;t a &#8220;state&#8221;: it has no representation in Congress, and that&#8217;s a big part of the problem.  </p>
<p>As for MA and NJ, what&#8217;s so lousy about those states?</p>
<p>As for California&#8230; it has the 5th biggest economy in the world.  I don&#8217;t see how being a Democratic state has hurt them.</p>
<p>When you look at the quality of life and relative prosperity of &#8220;blue&#8221; v. &#8220;red&#8221; states, it&#8217;s obvious the blue do better.  Why is that?</p>
<p>What can the GOP offer?  To use corporate-speak, what added value does it give to the country to justify supporting it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.W. Anderson</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/9945/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/comment-page-1/#comment-40807</link>
		<dc:creator>S.W. Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 02:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2006/12/31/politics/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/#comment-40807</guid>
		<description>Paul Silver, regarding hopefulness about GOP moderates wresting control of their party from the neocon scourge, I think it&#039;s much too soon to tell, but not to hope. 

I&#039;m not reassured by seeing how readily Bush and the rest of the Republicans can raise money, no matter how awful their performance in office. That tells me the selfish, cynical people  who see the Republican Party as an investment vehicle still think they&#039;ll get their best return on investment by paying the right-wing extremist neocons&#039; way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul Silver, regarding hopefulness about GOP moderates wresting control of their party from the neocon scourge, I think it&#8217;s much too soon to tell, but not to hope. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not reassured by seeing how readily Bush and the rest of the Republicans can raise money, no matter how awful their performance in office. That tells me the selfish, cynical people  who see the Republican Party as an investment vehicle still think they&#8217;ll get their best return on investment by paying the right-wing extremist neocons&#8217; way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikef</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/9945/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/comment-page-1/#comment-40804</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 02:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2006/12/31/politics/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/#comment-40804</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;They just threw their candidates, who were within fractions of a percentage point of winning, under the bus. Why?&lt;/i&gt;

Because even established candidates were worried that they could lose this year. George Allen was supposed to be the next president, Richard Pombo had an lock in his gerrymandered district, The entire Republican establishment of Ohio and Kansas were reeling, a black Democrat nearly won Bill Frist&#039;s seat in Tennessee. Previous elections were different - this year they were playing for survival, not &#039;survival of the fittest&#039;. 

The Republicans were playing  defense this year, and losing. Look at the list of candidates George Bush campaigned for in the last months - most were high level officers in red districts - and many of them lost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>They just threw their candidates, who were within fractions of a percentage point of winning, under the bus. Why?</i></p>
<p>Because even established candidates were worried that they could lose this year. George Allen was supposed to be the next president, Richard Pombo had an lock in his gerrymandered district, The entire Republican establishment of Ohio and Kansas were reeling, a black Democrat nearly won Bill Frist&#8217;s seat in Tennessee. Previous elections were different &#8211; this year they were playing for survival, not &#8216;survival of the fittest&#8217;. </p>
<p>The Republicans were playing  defense this year, and losing. Look at the list of candidates George Bush campaigned for in the last months &#8211; most were high level officers in red districts &#8211; and many of them lost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: superdestroyer</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/9945/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/comment-page-1/#comment-40797</link>
		<dc:creator>superdestroyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 01:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2006/12/31/politics/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/#comment-40797</guid>
		<description>CaseyL, 

In the long run, the Republicans will fad away due to demograhics if nothing else.  Since 90% of blacks, 70% of Hispanics, and 65% of Asians vote Democratic no matter what, there is nothing that the Republicans can do in the long run to remain viable. 

California is probably the best example.  There is no prospect for the Republicans to regain a majority in California even though the Democrats have done a pretty lousy job of running the state.  What California is today is what national politics will be by 2020. 

The real question will be is what will the U.S. be like with only one viable political party.  If you look at states like DC, New Jersey, or Mass. it will not be very pleasant for most people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CaseyL, </p>
<p>In the long run, the Republicans will fad away due to demograhics if nothing else.  Since 90% of blacks, 70% of Hispanics, and 65% of Asians vote Democratic no matter what, there is nothing that the Republicans can do in the long run to remain viable. </p>
<p>California is probably the best example.  There is no prospect for the Republicans to regain a majority in California even though the Democrats have done a pretty lousy job of running the state.  What California is today is what national politics will be by 2020. </p>
<p>The real question will be is what will the U.S. be like with only one viable political party.  If you look at states like DC, New Jersey, or Mass. it will not be very pleasant for most people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Silver</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/9945/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/comment-page-1/#comment-40794</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Silver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 00:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2006/12/31/politics/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/#comment-40794</guid>
		<description>Dean,
I wonder if the reason the Senators became stingy this election may be related to their near total control of the government. As in an out of balance ecosystem, nature tries to correct itself. Normally cooperative predators begin to cull each other from the herd until resources are back in balance.
I think you are right that the political pendulum does swing back and forth. But perhaps the Dems can slow the swing by moving the center of gravity towards the middle and adapting conservative characteristics like trying to balance the budget, reducing the deficit, reducing inefficiencies in   government operations, simplifying the tax system... If they pull this off then the GOP may only have a chance to regain influence by moving to the middle as well and trying to fix health care, SS, energy, immigration...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dean,<br />
I wonder if the reason the Senators became stingy this election may be related to their near total control of the government. As in an out of balance ecosystem, nature tries to correct itself. Normally cooperative predators begin to cull each other from the herd until resources are back in balance.<br />
I think you are right that the political pendulum does swing back and forth. But perhaps the Dems can slow the swing by moving the center of gravity towards the middle and adapting conservative characteristics like trying to balance the budget, reducing the deficit, reducing inefficiencies in   government operations, simplifying the tax system&#8230; If they pull this off then the GOP may only have a chance to regain influence by moving to the middle as well and trying to fix health care, SS, energy, immigration&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BeYourGuest</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/9945/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/comment-page-1/#comment-40793</link>
		<dc:creator>BeYourGuest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 00:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2006/12/31/politics/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/#comment-40793</guid>
		<description>Dean--

Isn&#039;t it more accurate to say the Republican moderates were responsible for whatever obstructions you care to name?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dean&#8211;</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it more accurate to say the Republican moderates were responsible for whatever obstructions you care to name?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Esmay</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/9945/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/comment-page-1/#comment-40790</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Esmay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 23:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2006/12/31/politics/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/#comment-40790</guid>
		<description>Paul: Since they weren&#039;t &quot;miserly&quot; in any recent elections before 2006, why were they so &quot;miserly&quot; now? Gee, maybe because it was obvious to them that they were going to lose no matter what.

If you&#039;re wondering, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.deanesmay.com/posts/1160046099.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here are the predictions I made a month before the election&lt;/a&gt;. Which, if I may say so, were pretty frickin&#039; on the money. I was wrong in only one very minor matter.

So please, let&#039;s get over it: if the Republicans were so &quot;miserly&quot; because they routinely believe in &quot;survival of the fittest,&quot; you&#039;d have to explain why they were NOT so &quot;miserly&quot; in previous elections. Which they were not.

As for BYG and others: I very much look forward to the day when Democrats hold the House, the Senate, and the White House again, which they undoubtedly will in the future. After all, as the Evil Satanic Demon Karl Rove has said many times, there are no permanent majorities in American politics. Democrats will be ascendant at times, and Republicans will be ascendant at times. That&#039;s how the system works.

But it&#039;s going to be instructive when such political naifs witness the day a Democratically controlled House, Senate, and White House all face an obstinate, obstructionist Republican minority that criticizes, demonizes, and obstructs everything they say or do.

Those with a little introspection will recognize it for what it is: the system as it&#039;s always worked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul: Since they weren&#8217;t &#8220;miserly&#8221; in any recent elections before 2006, why were they so &#8220;miserly&#8221; now? Gee, maybe because it was obvious to them that they were going to lose no matter what.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re wondering, <a href="http://www.deanesmay.com/posts/1160046099.shtml" rel="nofollow">here are the predictions I made a month before the election</a>. Which, if I may say so, were pretty frickin&#8217; on the money. I was wrong in only one very minor matter.</p>
<p>So please, let&#8217;s get over it: if the Republicans were so &#8220;miserly&#8221; because they routinely believe in &#8220;survival of the fittest,&#8221; you&#8217;d have to explain why they were NOT so &#8220;miserly&#8221; in previous elections. Which they were not.</p>
<p>As for BYG and others: I very much look forward to the day when Democrats hold the House, the Senate, and the White House again, which they undoubtedly will in the future. After all, as the Evil Satanic Demon Karl Rove has said many times, there are no permanent majorities in American politics. Democrats will be ascendant at times, and Republicans will be ascendant at times. That&#8217;s how the system works.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s going to be instructive when such political naifs witness the day a Democratically controlled House, Senate, and White House all face an obstinate, obstructionist Republican minority that criticizes, demonizes, and obstructs everything they say or do.</p>
<p>Those with a little introspection will recognize it for what it is: the system as it&#8217;s always worked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreenDreams</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/9945/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/comment-page-1/#comment-40789</link>
		<dc:creator>GreenDreams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 23:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2006/12/31/politics/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/#comment-40789</guid>
		<description>The GOP had it all, and the Dems didn&#039;t obstruct nearly as much as they should have (Patriot Act, &lt;strike&gt;Torture &lt;/strike&gt;Military Commissions Act, Alito, Roberts, the war, the irresponsible tax cuts, deficit spending, trashing the dollar, etc.) 

Social Security? No one favored that idiotic attempt to divert our retirement savings to the investment banks, and it was more the AARP (representing 35 million older Americans) that called the GOP on that crap than the Dems. All the Dems had to do was sit back and watch the Repubs grab the &quot;third rail&quot; and fry their domestic agenda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GOP had it all, and the Dems didn&#8217;t obstruct nearly as much as they should have (Patriot Act, <strike>Torture </strike>Military Commissions Act, Alito, Roberts, the war, the irresponsible tax cuts, deficit spending, trashing the dollar, etc.) </p>
<p>Social Security? No one favored that idiotic attempt to divert our retirement savings to the investment banks, and it was more the AARP (representing 35 million older Americans) that called the GOP on that crap than the Dems. All the Dems had to do was sit back and watch the Repubs grab the &#8220;third rail&#8221; and fry their domestic agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CaseyL</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/9945/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/comment-page-1/#comment-40788</link>
		<dc:creator>CaseyL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 23:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2006/12/31/politics/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/#comment-40788</guid>
		<description>As much as I would love to see the GOP finished as a national Party, the obituaries are much too soon.  Just two years ago, similar elegies were written for the Democrats.

The GOP&#039;s crowning accomplishment is undermining the entire concept of  government that works for the greater good of the country&#039;s citizens.  In no area of policy or legislation did the &quot;common prosperity and general welfare&quot; weigh at all with them.  It was all about wedge issues, enriching their sponsors and themselves, and protecting a rogue Administration.  Everything else didn&#039;t just take a back seat; everything else never &lt;i&gt;had&lt;/i&gt; a seat.

If the Democrats do nothing else, I hope they reinvigorate the most essential and basic foundation of America:  a government of the people, by the people and for the people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I would love to see the GOP finished as a national Party, the obituaries are much too soon.  Just two years ago, similar elegies were written for the Democrats.</p>
<p>The GOP&#8217;s crowning accomplishment is undermining the entire concept of  government that works for the greater good of the country&#8217;s citizens.  In no area of policy or legislation did the &#8220;common prosperity and general welfare&#8221; weigh at all with them.  It was all about wedge issues, enriching their sponsors and themselves, and protecting a rogue Administration.  Everything else didn&#8217;t just take a back seat; everything else never <i>had</i> a seat.</p>
<p>If the Democrats do nothing else, I hope they reinvigorate the most essential and basic foundation of America:  a government of the people, by the people and for the people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Silver</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/9945/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/comment-page-1/#comment-40785</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Silver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 22:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2006/12/31/politics/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/#comment-40785</guid>
		<description>SW Anderson,
My post was in part a lament that the more pragmatic and civil members of the GOP do not seem to be succeeding, or at least trying, to wrest control from the wingers. Do you see any reason to be hopeful?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SW Anderson,<br />
My post was in part a lament that the more pragmatic and civil members of the GOP do not seem to be succeeding, or at least trying, to wrest control from the wingers. Do you see any reason to be hopeful?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.W. Anderson</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/9945/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/comment-page-1/#comment-40782</link>
		<dc:creator>S.W. Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 22:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2006/12/31/politics/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/#comment-40782</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;Obstructing the GOP agenda was the only coherent position anyone could articulate from Democrats the last few years.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Given the GOP agenda the last few years, that was an admirable and desperately needed thing for Democrats to do. Trying to destroy the political opposition once and for all,  operating the government like a vending machine for Republican&#039;s financial backers, and pulling spite jobs like calling the Capitol Police to haul Democrats out of an empty meeting room just for spite don&#039;t equate with good government, regardless of any ideological considerations.

Invading the wrong country on trumped-up charges and a campaign of, at the least, gross exaggerations if not outright lies, is downright evil. And please, spare me any nonsense about freedom and democracy in Iraq. Those people are free to be kidnapped, tortured, shot, burned and blown up, and precious little else.

Republicans would be wise to rid themselves of the neoconservative bullies, crooks and crackpot warmongers who&#039;ve taken over their party and turned it into something ominously resembling organized crime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Obstructing the GOP agenda was the only coherent position anyone could articulate from Democrats the last few years.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Given the GOP agenda the last few years, that was an admirable and desperately needed thing for Democrats to do. Trying to destroy the political opposition once and for all,  operating the government like a vending machine for Republican&#8217;s financial backers, and pulling spite jobs like calling the Capitol Police to haul Democrats out of an empty meeting room just for spite don&#8217;t equate with good government, regardless of any ideological considerations.</p>
<p>Invading the wrong country on trumped-up charges and a campaign of, at the least, gross exaggerations if not outright lies, is downright evil. And please, spare me any nonsense about freedom and democracy in Iraq. Those people are free to be kidnapped, tortured, shot, burned and blown up, and precious little else.</p>
<p>Republicans would be wise to rid themselves of the neoconservative bullies, crooks and crackpot warmongers who&#8217;ve taken over their party and turned it into something ominously resembling organized crime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Silver</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/9945/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/comment-page-1/#comment-40779</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Silver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 22:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2006/12/31/politics/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/#comment-40779</guid>
		<description>BYG
I agree with you that Dems were generally just along for the ride.  But they were able to create some obstacles, along with Moderate Republicans, on SS accounts, Estate Tax, immigration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BYG<br />
I agree with you that Dems were generally just along for the ride.  But they were able to create some obstacles, along with Moderate Republicans, on SS accounts, Estate Tax, immigration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BeYourGuest</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/9945/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/comment-page-1/#comment-40774</link>
		<dc:creator>BeYourGuest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 22:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2006/12/31/politics/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/#comment-40774</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see how anyone can claim the Democrats were able to be obstructionist, given Republican control of the White House, Senate, and House of Representatives. 

Also, I&#039;m not really sure what got obstructed. 

Any explaination along these lines would be helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see how anyone can claim the Democrats were able to be obstructionist, given Republican control of the White House, Senate, and House of Representatives. </p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;m not really sure what got obstructed. </p>
<p>Any explaination along these lines would be helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: superdestroyer</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/9945/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/comment-page-1/#comment-40771</link>
		<dc:creator>superdestroyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 21:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2006/12/31/politics/gop-and-survival-of-the-fittest/#comment-40771</guid>
		<description>Peter, 

There is virtually no chance for a Republican come back.  If you look at the demographics of the United States, national politics around the time of 2020 will resemble California politics today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, </p>
<p>There is virtually no chance for a Republican come back.  If you look at the demographics of the United States, national politics around the time of 2020 will resemble California politics today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

