This long article in New York Magazine reviews Billionaire New York Mayor Bloomberg’s political past and possible future. Some nuggets:
“…the sense that his persona—blunt, pragmatic, consensus-building, ideologically ambidextrous—is in sync with an electorate desperately craving calm, coherent centrism….…Then came the fall campaign and his move beyond national issues to national electioneering—endorsing and raising money for a micro-slate of Bloombergian candidates. There were moderate Republicans such as California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. There were moderate Democrats such as Missouri Senate challenger Claire McCaskill. And there was Senator Joe Lieberman, the country’s most prominent independent, whom Bloomberg aided by dispatching a squad of seasoned hands to shore up his faltering operation. “No one in public life,â€? Lieberman says, “has done more for me in this campaign than Mike.â€?
…And Bloomberg has none of Perot’s isolationist or nativist leanings. But in other ways, their similarities are striking: both arch-capitalists, self-made men, technocrats, moralists; both possessed of a belief that government ought to be run more like a business; both allergic to the cant and dogma inherent in professional politics.
…Bush’s longtime media guru, Mark McKinnon, who now advises McCain, contends that “if a year from now there hasn’t been much progress or bipartisanship, and if the primaries do what they often do and squeeze out the moderates, you’ll have an ideal situation for a third-party run.â€? Sheekey, in fact, has publicly laid out the most likely Bloomberg-friendly scenario: McCain is beaten by someone to his right (Mitt Romney, say) and the Democrats choose someone generally seen as unelectable (guess who?).
…Schoen points out that Bloomberg’s operation in 2001 was ahead of the Bush team’s now-famous use in 2004 of microtargeting—the new political science of combining consumer-database information with voter rolls to target people likely to be receptive to your message. And in 2005, Sheekey cranked up the tactic up another notch. In both elections, the Bloomberg campaign applied new technology, plus a boatload of cash, to the task of identifying and turning out independent and unenrolled voters.”
Bloomberg has the money to run for President if he chooses, and he is pondering what is the best use of his time and resources. I hope that if he does not run for President that he turns to helping moderate candidates in close races. Helping to elect 50 more Centrists to Congress, enthusiastic about working across party lines to craft pragmatic improvements to our government, would be a tremendous legacy that may help to save the two party system from itself.
Yeah, he’ll do well in the Republican primaries. Yep.
So far, with very few exceptions, third party candidates have basically helped the party win that third party members didn’t want to see win. There have been many cases of buyer’s remorse. Bloomberg would help one of the other two major parties win. Unless polls going into it showed some lopsidded popularity, it’s unlikely a strong third party candidate would win and most likely it would help tilt the election to one of the other two major parties.
I think Bloomberg’s rather pandering and anti-police involvement in the recent shooting incident would seriously undermine his ability to appeal to either Republican primary voters or a general election voter base.
My God! You buried the lede:
Buried lede or not, you’re still a genius, Paul! Draft Bloomberg to do that, not to run for president!!
I like it, I like it. Get the parties to put America first over partisan divisions, by promoting candidates willing to do what it takes to succeed!