An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right
“Our Army size was entirely adequate for crushing Saddam’s forces in short order. It’s probably adequate to doing the same to Iran’s forces. It’s not up to fully policing a big country once we’ve done that. Do we want a military that is?”
Hmm, somehow this opinion looks familiar to me. Is Reynolds reading TMV comments???
I’m glad to see that even Kevin Drum thinks Reynolds has a point with this statement:
“We like to treat this [i.e., the broad war on terror] as a military problem because (1) we’re good at those; and (2) that seems to produce simple questions, like “more troops, or not?” Trouble is, those probably aren’t the right questions.”
Yeah, really, if your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.
Damn, agreeing with the Instapuntz makes me feeling dizzy. I hope this a simply a sole exception from the general rule that Reynolds is always wrong…
“Our Army size was entirely adequate for crushing Saddam’s forces in short order. It’s probably adequate to doing the same to Iran’s forces. It’s not up to fully policing a big country once we’ve done that. Do we want a military that is?”
Hmm, somehow this opinion looks familiar to me. Is Reynolds reading TMV comments???
He did link to Shaun’s article…
I’m glad to see that even Kevin Drum thinks Reynolds has a point with this statement:
“We like to treat this [i.e., the broad war on terror] as a military problem because (1) we’re good at those; and (2) that seems to produce simple questions, like “more troops, or not?” Trouble is, those probably aren’t the right questions.”
Yeah, really, if your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.
Damn, agreeing with the Instapuntz makes me feeling dizzy. I hope this a simply a sole exception from the general rule that Reynolds is always wrong…
A Bigger Pecker?
We already spend WAY WAY to much on defense. To big is just wasted.