An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right

‘Proxies For the West versus Militant Islam’


(click on photo to enlarge)

In his article ‘How China’s secret deals are fuelling war’, Stephen Pollard, a senior Fellow at the Centre for the New Europe, Brussels, says the “STORY behind the story in the Middle East today is the proxy war, as Israel, on behalf of the US, takes on Hezbollah, which fights on behalf of Iran and Syria.

“Indeed, one can widen it further and describe the participants as proxies for the West versus militant Islam.

“This analysis of the conflict sometimes mentions, in passing, Russia’s declining influence. But there is another player that has somehow received almost no coverage.

“For decades China has been building up influence in the Middle East. It suits China’s strategy well that coverage has been almost non-existent. As Deng Xiaoping once put it, China must ‘hide brightness and nourish obscurity…to bide our time and build up our capabilities’. As China develops into the role of global power, its influence on the region is no longer obscure; it cannot now be ignored.

“The original postwar Middle East proxies were the US and the Soviet Union. Washington supporting Israel and the Kremlin sponsoring enemy regimes and their terrorist offshoots. But the Sino-Soviet split, which began in the 1960s, meant a lifting of the constraint on China getting involved, and it soon began to develop ties to countries that were not under Soviet influence, such as Egypt under Sadat.

“A brilliant analysis of China’s role by Barry Rubin, in the Middle East Review of International Affairs, describes China’s first steps thus: ‘As hope for global revolution faded and Beijing switched its partners from tiny opposition groups to governments, China now projected itself as leader of the Third World, struggling against the hegemony of the two superpowers, the USSR and the United States. Lacking the strength and level of development of other great powers, China would try to make itself the head of a massive coalition of the weaker states.’ That meant, in the Middle East, Israel’s enemies.

“Today countries such as Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Pakistan — all key states in the region — have strong ties to China, which they are all likely to see as a counterbalance to American power in the Middle East and beyond.

“As President Jiang Zemin put it in 1994, US ‘hegemony’ should be opposed, in part by helping countries such as Iran, which were already fighting that battle. But China’s strategy dovetailed geopolitics with economic necessity. Without access to oil markets, China had to fuel economic expansion by turning to more neglected suppliers, such as Iran, Iraq and Sudan.

“And with a growing consumption of Gulf oil, so China has had to direct its security policy towards ensuring that the US will not be able to interfere with the flow of oil. This means developing ever stronger political and strategic relationships with oil exporters.

“The Middle East is now China’s fourth largest trading partner. But its trade is hardly traditional. As Rubin puts it: ‘Being so late in entering the region — and having less to offer in economic or technology terms than the United States, Russia, Japan, and Europe — China must go after marginal or risky markets . . . supplying customers no one else will service with goods no one else will sell them.’ What that means, of course, is arms.

“In the war-by-proxy analysis, Iran is rightly said to be the power and arms supplier behind Hezbollah. But the issue of where Iran’s arms come from has been ignored. China has sold Iran tanks, planes, artillery, cruise, anti-tank, surface-to-surface and anti-aircraft missiles as well as ships and mines.

“It is also Iran’s main supplier of unconventional arms and is thought by almost all monitors to be illicitly involved in supplying key elements in Iran’s chemical and nuclear weapons programme. This is despite China being a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and the Chemical Weapons Convention.

“China has sold nuclear reactors to Algeria, Iran, Syria, and Saudi Arabia, and Chinese nuclear weapons designs were found in Libya. It has also negotiated with Syria on the sale of M11 ballistic missiles.

“China is one of the few global suppliers of ballistic missiles. and can charge a heavy price. It demanded of the Saudis, for instance, to whom it sold CSS2 missiles, payment in cash, ensuring both the cementing of a key strategic relationship and total deniability of the sale.”



8 Responses to “‘Proxies For the West versus Militant Islam’”

  1. C.Prez says:

    All the while China is financing the U.S.’s “War on Terror”. They’re about to have the world by the balls.

  2. Rudi says:

    Yes, and keep shopping at Wal-Mart. The Walton family and China are laughing all the way to the bank. China as a non-align nation allowsthem to influence and sell to all. The weapons in the ME have “Made in USA” and “Made in China” all over the weapons.

  3. Pyst says:

    Bing, bing , bing WE HAVE A WWINNER!

    I can’t believe we helped build a COMMUNIST DICTATORSHIP into the monster that will devous us eventually. The overiding greed of capitalism sheilded the eyes of the corporate captains, and politcal enablers to create this monster. We are now as C.Prez pointed out, putting out ME debacle on the Chinese credit card. Our days are numbered unless we adress the Wal Marts, Targets, and other businesses that do almost all their business through China. Greed is good yada yada, but not at the country’s expense. Thats economic traitorism by the corporate, for the wealth of the few. And the vast majority of this has been done by neo-cons, and DLC money grubbers, ignoring the eventual outcome as long as they are happy today. I say both these groups are guilty of economic treason against the US, and should be purged from power at all levels….Joe L was a good start.

  4. cool says:

    The world keeps changing. No one can have absolute power for ever. By 2050 China and India will outstrip everyone else. US will eventually become a poodle of India similar to the previous superpower Britain is to US today and Russia will become a poodle of China. Then we can sit and watch an Asian Century.

  5. Salmenio says:

    Well stone the friggen crows!

    I have been screaming this for years now. I find it amazing that others are opening their eyes to China’s subtle aggression. Chinese submarines have been probing our defenses in Okinawa and Japan for nearly a decade. All the while, we give them the technology to do so. I have already met three U.S. Sailors in sensitive posts that four years ago they had never seen the outside of Red China!

    Who started this? The stupid republicans did. “Wow what a potential market, a BILLION people”, they said as they licked their chops in anticipation.

    Opening their “markets” is a Trojan Horse strategic policy for opposing the United States and becoming the dominant power in a world they fully intend to control with an iron fist.

    Just like Global Warming our capitalists ignore the Chinese threat for something as selfish as short term profit.

    The glitter of gold blinds all men of weak character.

  6. Pyst says:

    DLC corporate hoes are in the boat with the GOP Sal. They were the ones that championed NAFTA, and China joining the the G7. So part ownership of this goes to them as well. But the GOP signed on to the idea bigtime, that is true. So much for the anit-communist crap the GOP used to scream about, just add money.

  7. Kevin H says:

    “The original postwar Middle East proxies were the US and the Soviet Union. Washington supporting Israel and the Kremlin sponsoring enemy regimes and their terrorist offshoots.”

    Just in case anyone forgot, it was acutally US supporting Islamic Jihadist groups against the ‘godless’ communists….

© 2003-2011 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Mode Equity