
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cheney&#8217;s Terrorists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/62499/cheneys-terrorists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/62499/cheneys-terrorists/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 00:16:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tripoli_Kid</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/62499/cheneys-terrorists/comment-page-1/#comment-251311</link>
		<dc:creator>Tripoli_Kid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=62499#comment-251311</guid>
		<description>Maybe it was his intention to stir up the terrorist pot to keep the military-industrial-complex going.We all know who profits from that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it was his intention to stir up the terrorist pot to keep the military-industrial-complex going.We all know who profits from that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dduck12</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/62499/cheneys-terrorists/comment-page-1/#comment-251202</link>
		<dc:creator>dduck12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 23:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=62499#comment-251202</guid>
		<description>I also share Sil&#039;s perspective about nuclear power&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Finally, O and I can agree that Nuclear is good for us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also share Sil&#39;s perspective about nuclear power&#8221;</p>
<p>Finally, O and I can agree that Nuclear is good for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DdW</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/62499/cheneys-terrorists/comment-page-1/#comment-251171</link>
		<dc:creator>DdW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=62499#comment-251171</guid>
		<description>General Donald Edwards may &quot;only&quot; have been a 2-star general...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>General Donald Edwards may &#8220;only&#8221; have been a 2-star general&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Father_Time</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/62499/cheneys-terrorists/comment-page-1/#comment-251155</link>
		<dc:creator>Father_Time</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=62499#comment-251155</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to make an observation here, just for future reference, that Admiral Mullins wears no combat ribbons. Nor do many current Generals and Admirals.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So I think we must take an individual close look at those whom talk about &quot;putting their life on the line&quot; when making political comments. However, military service is irrelevant for political office and therefore irrelevant for ordering the military into combat. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;President Obama did not serve in the military either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;d like to make an observation here, just for future reference, that Admiral Mullins wears no combat ribbons. Nor do many current Generals and Admirals.</p>
<p>So I think we must take an individual close look at those whom talk about &#8220;putting their life on the line&#8221; when making political comments. However, military service is irrelevant for political office and therefore irrelevant for ordering the military into combat. </p>
<p>President Obama did not serve in the military either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreenDreams</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/62499/cheneys-terrorists/comment-page-1/#comment-251144</link>
		<dc:creator>GreenDreams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=62499#comment-251144</guid>
		<description>great article, with which I mostly agree. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also share Sil&#039;s perspective about nuclear power. The suggestion that it&#039;s a sustainable solution is simply untrue. The cost of nuclear is going up nearly as fast (exponentially) as the cost of wind and solar are *falling*. The US has little uranium and global supplies will run out at about the same time as oil. Add the social and environmental costs of extraction and disposal, plus the insurance cost, which we pay, and the decommissioning (which is never included in the cost), and you have a real loser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great article, with which I mostly agree. </p>
<p>I also share Sil&#39;s perspective about nuclear power. The suggestion that it&#39;s a sustainable solution is simply untrue. The cost of nuclear is going up nearly as fast (exponentially) as the cost of wind and solar are *falling*. The US has little uranium and global supplies will run out at about the same time as oil. Add the social and environmental costs of extraction and disposal, plus the insurance cost, which we pay, and the decommissioning (which is never included in the cost), and you have a real loser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DdW</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/62499/cheneys-terrorists/comment-page-1/#comment-251143</link>
		<dc:creator>DdW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=62499#comment-251143</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Unlike Dick Cheney, who glorifies conflict but has never put his own body on the line, I am a retired military officer. I know firsthand the long list of security threats that our country faces. And I know that Cheney’s reckless strategy, out of touch with today’s threats, made that list longer&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can just hear it:  &quot;This guy is just a disgruntled four star general, what does he know?  And probably a Democrat, too&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Unlike Dick Cheney, who glorifies conflict but has never put his own body on the line, I am a retired military officer. I know firsthand the long list of security threats that our country faces. And I know that Cheney’s reckless strategy, out of touch with today’s threats, made that list longer</p></blockquote>
<p>I can just hear it:  &#8220;This guy is just a disgruntled four star general, what does he know?  And probably a Democrat, too&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Father_Time</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/62499/cheneys-terrorists/comment-page-1/#comment-251112</link>
		<dc:creator>Father_Time</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 19:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=62499#comment-251112</guid>
		<description>Let me take it even another step further.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We, the United States, do not know what the hell we are doing and in doing it, we are destroying ourselves.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Guantanamo would be irrelevant had our grand strategy succeeded, and, is just another shovel of dirt on our grave as our grand strategy fails.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hindsight is 20/20 General, but maybe that is all that our over paid over pampered military strategists are capable of.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Are you prepared to offer for public scrutiny the options the Pentagon offered our elected leadership after 9/11/2001....? If not, how can you hold our leadership responsible for choosing a certain path to take?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I submit that if the Vice President was the architect of anything at all, it was with the information the Pentagon and the intelligence community provided. Again indicative that we, the United States, simply do not know what we are doing….on many levels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me take it even another step further.</p>
<p>We, the United States, do not know what the hell we are doing and in doing it, we are destroying ourselves.</p>
<p>Guantanamo would be irrelevant had our grand strategy succeeded, and, is just another shovel of dirt on our grave as our grand strategy fails.</p>
<p>Hindsight is 20/20 General, but maybe that is all that our over paid over pampered military strategists are capable of.</p>
<p>Are you prepared to offer for public scrutiny the options the Pentagon offered our elected leadership after 9/11/2001&#8230;.? If not, how can you hold our leadership responsible for choosing a certain path to take?</p>
<p>I submit that if the Vice President was the architect of anything at all, it was with the information the Pentagon and the intelligence community provided. Again indicative that we, the United States, simply do not know what we are doing….on many levels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silhouette</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/62499/cheneys-terrorists/comment-page-1/#comment-251101</link>
		<dc:creator>Silhouette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=62499#comment-251101</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d go one step further and say how odd it is that Cheney comes out in favor of something and if he doesn&#039;t get it, we have a &quot;terrorist&quot; strike just after his announcment that &quot;proves&quot; he had a point and we should give him what he wanted.  So my conclusion is that either the terrorists are really stupid and can&#039;t figure out when to time their attacks to make Cheney look bad or they are timing their attacks to give Cheney the backing he wants to &quot;fight&quot; &quot;them&quot;?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Very curious indeed.  Bin Laden is pretty much Cheney&#039;s best friend in that regards, near as I can tell.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And of course this is all about oil.  We don&#039;t need nukes BTW.  Plenty of geothermal to turn water into steam [which is all nuke plants do with uranium + deadly radiation and providing perfect terrorist targets therefore..]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;d go one step further and say how odd it is that Cheney comes out in favor of something and if he doesn&#39;t get it, we have a &#8220;terrorist&#8221; strike just after his announcment that &#8220;proves&#8221; he had a point and we should give him what he wanted.  So my conclusion is that either the terrorists are really stupid and can&#39;t figure out when to time their attacks to make Cheney look bad or they are timing their attacks to give Cheney the backing he wants to &#8220;fight&#8221; &#8220;them&#8221;?</p>
<p>Very curious indeed.  Bin Laden is pretty much Cheney&#39;s best friend in that regards, near as I can tell.</p>
<p>And of course this is all about oil.  We don&#39;t need nukes BTW.  Plenty of geothermal to turn water into steam [which is all nuke plants do with uranium + deadly radiation and providing perfect terrorist targets therefore..]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dduck12</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/62499/cheneys-terrorists/comment-page-1/#comment-251096</link>
		<dc:creator>dduck12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=62499#comment-251096</guid>
		<description>The author gives too much credit to Cheney (a definite recruitment tool) and not enough to the momentum the terrorists had moving from the Cole and embassy bombings and culminating in their extremely successful 9/11 version of Pearl Harbor.  He may be underestimating AQ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The author gives too much credit to Cheney (a definite recruitment tool) and not enough to the momentum the terrorists had moving from the Cole and embassy bombings and culminating in their extremely successful 9/11 version of Pearl Harbor.  He may be underestimating AQ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

