An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right

Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell: No Golden Silence Here

New York Times columnist Frank Rich must not read The Moderate Voice.

In a column today in the Times, discussing the reaction to Adm. Mullen’s testimony on “don’t ask, don’t tell,” Rich says:

A funny thing happened after Adm. Mike Mullen called for gay men and lesbians to serve openly in the military: A curious silence befell much of the right. If this were a Sherlock Holmes story, it would be the case of the attack dogs that did not bark.

Rich contends that, perhaps with the exception of John McCain—“the crazy man in Washington’s attic”— “[fulminating] against the repeal of ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’”:

Many of his Republican colleagues said little or nothing. The right’s noise machine was on mute. The Fox News report on Mullen’s testimony was fair and balanced — and brief. The network dropped the subject entirely in the Hannity-O’Reilly hothouse of prime time that night. Only ratings-desperate CNN gave a fleeting platform to the old homophobic clichés.

Others mentioned by Rich as having problems with the repeal of DADT are Michael O’Hanlon, an “expert” from the Brookings Institution, and the Family Research Council, “which issued an inevitable ‘action alert’ demanding a stop to ‘the sexualization of our military.’”

Rich then asks the question, “The occasional outliers notwithstanding, why did such a hush greet Mullen on Capitol Hill?”

Rich goes on to provide some possible answers, some put forward in my recent post on this issue:

• “[T]he simple fact that a large majority of voters — between 61 percent and 75 percent depending on the poll — now share [Mullen’s] point of view. Most Americans recognize that being gay is not a ‘lifestyle’ but an immutable identity, and that outlawing discrimination against gay people who want to serve their country is, as the admiral said, ‘the right thing to do.’”

• The fact that many Americans in all walks of life share the views and feelings expressed in Mullen’s “heartfelt, plain-spoken testimony,” on accepting the reality, humanity and equal rights of gays: “As more gay people have come out…so more heterosexuals have learned that they have gay relatives, friends, neighbors, teachers and co-workers. It is hard to deny our own fundamental rights to those we know, admire and love.”

• The “potent political subtext” that, in contrast to when Karl Rove and George W. Bush “ran a national campaign exploiting fear of gay people, there is now little political advantage to spewing homophobia. Indeed, anti-gay animus is far more likely to repel voters than attract them.” And, now that such an explicit anti-gay animus is “an albatross, those who oppose gay civil rights are driven to invent ever loopier rationales for denying those rights, whether in the military or in marriage.”

Rich concludes with comments similar to those made by most TMV contributors and readers in their posts and comments, respectively:

The more bigotry pushed out of the closet for all voters to see, the more likely it is that Americans will be moved to grant overdue full citizenship to gay Americans. It won’t happen overnight, any more than full civil rights for African-Americans immediately followed Truman’s desegregation of the armed forces. But there can be no doubt that Mike Mullen’s powerful act of conscience last week, just as we marked the 50th anniversary of the Greensboro, N.C., lunch counter sit-in, pushed history forward. The revealing silence that followed from so many of the usual suspects was pretty golden too.

And this brings me back to my initial comment that Rich must not be reading The Moderate Voice. For, at TMV, there has been a very lively discussion on this issue and some very frank reactions. Some so “frank” that they had to be “moderated” in order to remain within the common sense, civil “Comments Standards” at TMV.

Witness the fact that even a couple of Cagle cartoons posted at TMV on this issue have generated a significant number of comments. This cartoon (Gays in the Military) has drawn 33 comments thus far, and this one (Boot Camp for Homophobes), 27 comments.

No “golden silence” at TMV.



54 Responses to “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell: No Golden Silence Here”

  1. DdW says:

    From Politico:

    If President Barack Obama really wants to end Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, as he said in his State of the Union speech, he should quit passing the buck, take a stiff swig of Harry Truman political courage and do it.

    Truman never had to deal with the issue of gays and lesbians in the military. But at the end of World War II he was faced with a more-daunting problem: The victorious U.S. armed services were still racially segregated, a policy he found terribly unjust.

    Never heretofore known as a great liberal on civil rights, Truman, an old Army man, saw that the battle cry of freedom that spurred Americans of all races and creeds to rise up and battle the Japanese and Germans rang hollow to the millions of black Americans whose sons and daughters fought and died for the cause, but still faced discrimination in all walks of life.

    Truman tried commissions and advisory boards and even sought legislation in Congress to promote civil rights. But he met resistance at every turn, especially from southerners in his own Democratic Party. So in July 1948, as commander-in-chief, with a bold stroke of a pen on Executive Order 9981 in July 1948, he took a first step and desegregated the armed services.

    “It is hereby declared to be the policy of the president that there shall be equality of treatment and opportunity for all persons in the armed services without regard to race, color, religion, or national origin,” the order said.

    The moves were not politically popular. Truman’s Gallup Poll job approval was just 36 percent at the time. But he didn’t back down.

    :

    McClure adds that if Obama makes the move now, he will ensure that presidents who follow in his footsteps will not have to deal with the issue.

    Looking at the polls, Obama might not be taking a big political risk by issuing the order. A Fox News/Opinion Dynamics Poll taken Feb, 2-3 showed 61 percent of Americans favor gays and lesbians openly serving in the military. That includes 62 percent of independents, a critical voting group that has been down on Obama in recent months.

    If he believes it’s the right thing to do, he can forget the working groups and advisory committees, get out his commander-in-chief pen and do it. Harry Truman would love it.

  2. Dr J says:

    It would do Obama good too. The man is all carrot and no stick. The occasional loose-cannon executive action would help his effectiveness overall.

  3. WagglebutII says:

    I am not so sure Obama can leagally do an HST directive to end DADT. As it was codified into law, I'm quite certain it will have to be either repealed by Congress or by SCOTUS. This according to a fairly comprehensive discussion on anther thread on TMV. I wouldn't oppose his order to ban permanently its enforcement which as CIC he probably could do. However, as a matter of civic decency the US ought to legislatively remove DADT as a national, statutory statement. By the way, I was really surprised by FT's announcement that he was joining the extreme right. I mistakenly took his inquiries as a genuine search for truth! (ROTFLMAO)

© 2003-2011 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Mode Equity