An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right

COUNTDOWN TO OBAMA & BIDEN RESIGNATIONS

If Republicans retake both Houses of Congress this November, President Obama and Vice-President Biden should resign after the new Congress is seated in early January 2011. Following the U.S. Constitution and Federal Law, the person next in line to the Presidency would be the Speaker of the House. If the House were controlled by Republicans, then they would choose the next Speaker and thus the President. It would be only appropriate that Sarah Palin, Scott Brown, or some other Republican should govern the country with the Republican-controlled Congress.

The utter failure to enact anything of significance during 2009 can be partially blamed upon various Blue-Dog Democrats in the House and particularly the Senate. The Stimulus bill was too small and misdirected. The continuing misguided bank bailouts, the extension of TARP, and the failure to promptly enact any meaningful financial regulations were also huge failures. The failure to permit homeowners to modify their mortgages in bankruptcy was also economically and politically foolish. The 10-month waste of time called Healthcare reform was the final insult and nail in the Democratic coffin. There is only a snowball’s chance in Hell that any of these proposals will be passed by the dysfunctional Democrat party before the Midterm elections.

Throughout this entire process, the President was the head of the Democratic Party and leader of the largest majorities in both legislative Houses. President Obama screwed up royally in 2009 for all his naïve efforts at bi-partisanship and post-partisanship. He should have concentrated on getting things accomplished and quickly. He let Republicans frame the arguments and overall debate. He and his advisers were clueless on what was really going on across the country with respect to rising unemployment, business failures, residential and commercial real estate foreclosures, and many other “bread and butter” issues that voters tend to dwell upon – particularly if frighteningly large numbers of them are losing their jobs and homes.

The President imposed no party discipline within the Democratic ranks. He has been more concerned about being popular than respected, yet alone feared. He has had real no sense of his limited window of opportunity. He squandered far too many opportunities and instead gave more and more meaningless pretty and empty speeches. He accepted a Nobel Peace Prize for which he was wholly unqualified instead of graciously declining it.

After President Bush 43 lost Republican control over Congress in November 2006, the last 2 years of his lame-duck term were even more excruciating in that absolutely nothing was addressed. He effectively moved to Crawford, TX and put half the country and its economy on auto-pilot, and the other half in the trustworthy hands of the out-of-control financial sector. It would have been better had he resigned at that point as well.

The Constitution mandates different 2, 4 and 6 year terms for most Federal office-holders, but it does not prohibit resignations or impeachments to cut off those terms. Hell, President Clinton was impeached for lying about having an affair with an intern so almost anything the opposition doesn’t like about a President is sufficient grounds for impeachment.

There has never been a “successful 1-term Presidency.” Successful Presidents get re-elected. Thus President Obama will not likely comfort himself with that moniker but he’ll have a very lucrative career back in teaching, making speeches, and leading other ex-Presidents on various global humanitarian projects.

Republicans successfully shifted the blame for all their massive policy mistakes onto President Obama long before the financial crash in 2008 to the point in time when he first took office as a U.S. Senator in a slightly Democratically-controlled Senate in January 2007. (Thus every job lost in the U.S. since 2007 is solely his fault, particularly since he is an avowed socialist Nigerian bent on destroying the country on behalf of China and Iran.) They will continue to successfully blame him for all our country’s woes even if he resigns in January 2011, until at least January 2013 and then possibly for the subsequent 4 years of Republican rule. This country desperately needs “scapegoats” and President Obama would fit the bill. Former Vice-President Al Gore is solely responsible for all the bad weather on the planet as per the weathermen on Fox News.

It is more than likely that nothing of significance will occur in Washington before the 2012 general elections. We will have a perpetually “Mexican Standoff” between an ineffectual, weak and rejected Democratic President, and a polar-opposite re-energized angry Republican Party. Our country will have to muddle through while Washington is in the grips of complete political paralysis and legislative gridlock. The country faces too many massive problems that should be tackled, at least partially by the party chosen by the majority of the country to lead.

Republicans should consider former Florida Governor Jeb Bush as their new leader. He’s the taller, younger brother of Bush 43 who now looks pretty good in retrospect to many uneducated, lazy and angry Americans who have short attention spans, and no knowledge of history or economics. Gov. Jeb met his Latina spouse while studying in Mexico. They both are conservative Roman Catholics who speak both English and Spanish. This would kill the alleged demographic lock on Latino/Hispanic voters by the Democratic Party. A third Bush Presidency would ensure perpetual Republican control as the U.S. sinks to its inevitable Gotterdammerung global political, economic, military and cultural collapse within the next 2 decades.

The Democrats only had 2 years to get things accomplished. So far, they have failed miserably by their own accounts and things look pretty bleak for the balance of 2010. If Republicans take Congress by anything greater than 1 vote margins, President Obama will be deemed a complete failure and a lame-duck 1-term President. Even if Republicans come shy of actual majorities, many conservative Democrats will jump ship and shift the power in Washington. The easily-bored American electorate and our 24/7 info-entertainment shallow News Media have no patience and constantly need new events, issues, celebrities and leaders to keep us perpetually entertained as the country slouches toward complete global irrelevance.

It would be better for the country if President Obama and Vice-President Biden to resign in favor of a Republican President selected by the New Republican House of Representatives in January 2011. If The President and Vice-President do not resign, then Congress should impeach them in a long, drawn-out process that should make it through the summer of 2012.

A Republican Congress really has no intention of enacting financial or healthcare reform, helping homeowners, spending governmental money stimulating new public and private jobs, or anything else the Democrats failed to address during 2009 and 2010. They would really have a pretty open calendar perfect for another impeachment charade. Even natural or man-made disasters cannot alter their overall policies of complete inaction and calls for more tax cuts.

If they are in charge again after 2011, Republicans will again try to cut taxes – particularly for the wealthy, large corporations, and major campaign contributors and advertisers. They might actually drastically cut all domestic spending, particularly for the pesky EPA, Justice Department, Air Traffic Control, Departments of Energy, Education and Transportation and still end up about 1 trillion dollars in the hole.

Republicans really have to kill the paltry $8 billion for high speed and conventional rail projects – and the $1.5 billion annual subsidy for Amtrak that even President Reagan couldn’t kill. Let’s get back at Warren Buffet for supporting Democrats and kill all trains and railroads in the U.S. now that he bought BNSF Railroad.

They could eliminate the paltry 18.3 cent per gallon federal gasoline tax to spite all those people calling for solar, wind and alternative energy sources. Their corporate friends such as Exxon-Mobil and terrorist-funding oil-rich states will quickly raise gas prices to swallow the savings, but long-term thinking is not a Republican forte.

They would also try to stimulate the economy (or certain parts of it) by expanding Defense spending and getting us into a few more endless wars. We could stay in Iraq and Afghanistan for another 100 years as Senator John McCain suggested, spending over $20 billion a month in 2 countries that have a combined annual GDP of just $23 billion. (Couldn’t we save a ton of money and many lives – plus engender global goodwill – by leaving immediately and sending both countries a monthly check of just $2 billion each to spend or squander as they please?)

Some Republicans are livid about the cuts to NASA. Let’s build a $6 trillion military base on the moon so we won’t lose it to the Chinese, even though we’ll already have lost most of our real economy and all effective financial power to them. The base would also be insurance in the event global climate change is real and we have to ship our wealthy citizens and Republican ruling class to a new home while the rest of humanity deals with the mess they left back here on earth. Spend our tax dollars on anything loony but directly helping the majority of American citizens.

These Republican policies will likely increase – not decrease – projected Federal budgets but they can always blame “Big Government” Democrats for that. It seems to always work at election time. Republicans can enact their very limited agenda because most provisions can be passed by simple majorities under reconciliation terms applying to both the House and Senate. People can vociferously dislike what Republicans do – but dammit – they know how to get things done – unlike Democrats.

It was fun Democrats, but the party is almost over. You don’t have the ability, will or “Cojones” to actually enact any of your policies or even run a major government. Voters are really upset with you and they are in no mood to think rationally. It will soon be time to move on – possibly you should all move to New York and California and try to solve the problems of those 2 states first before tackling anything larger. Perhaps you might start even smaller – solving the massive problems facing just Chicago, Detroit, Cleveland and Buffalo, before moving up the geographic map. These cities have been perpetually in Democratic control and they are still all major urban failures. If you can’t get these places right, why should voters trust you with anything larger?

Marc Pascal is still in a Ground-Hog Day funk but happily ranting (tongue in cheek) from rainy Phoenix, AZ.



18 Responses to “COUNTDOWN TO OBAMA & BIDEN RESIGNATIONS”

  1. ballester03 says:

    You can find full medical coverage at the lowest price from http://bit.ly/atGzeD

  2. Fabio Sekoff says:

    No form of government is perfect but capitalism always, and has always WORKED! Small and big corporations create Jobs weather here or abroad, Unions do not create anything but like big government have BIG appetites, Oil will be king for many years (that's long term thinking) but it also can “fuel” alternative energy sources, if we use our resources instead of demonizing them, is not about stopping the flow of oil but creating competition within our borders instead of sending $700+ Billions A FREAKING YEAR to the middle east, I guess no one addresses that “small” problem but we bitch about $20B a month spent in wars and the stabilizing & rebuilding of those countries, which in the long term comes back to us just like it did rebuilding Japan, Korea, REAGAN had the biggest and baddest Armed Forces, then Bill “I did not have sex with that woman” Clinton reduced it to a few trying to “balance” the budget, and people wonder why we send the same soldiers there over and over but of course nobody thinks Long term right?
    The founding documents work no matter what century we are in just like the Bible…people try to suppress the truth Always, but as the same Bible states, the truth shall set you FREE!
    No one check history, that's why they keep making the same mistakes, Back in the Great depression and NOW repeating the SAME mistakes…Economies go up and down check history and they tend to come back up without government intervention, Ancient Rome went through the same thing we are going through, Government and taxes were rampant, and BAM it collapsed, USA because of its founding Fathers and their legacy its still kicking but, limping yes because of the massive debt, caused by big government weather from one party or the other, Exactly what the Founding fathers and Reagan so famously were against and proclaimed, If somebody says to you, “I'm here to help, i come from the government”…Haul ass the other way and never look back!
    People stop trying to reinvent the wheel, so simple yet many keep doing the same mistakes, and to boot the intellectuals are the ones making the same mistakes…Take heed from Voltaire a few Centuries ago, he stated that within a 100 yrs the Bible would be gone for good, then a 100 yrs later his house was a Bible printing press in France…Need i say more!

  3. shannonlee says:

    That was a fun read…thanks.

  4. “Exactly what the Founding fathers and Reagan so famously were against and proclaimed, If somebody says to you, “I'm here to help, i come from the government”…Haul ass the other way and never look back!”

    Reagan raised taxes and inflated the deficit, genius. He also kept or increased gun control but blamed it on the democrats.

    Get a new hero.

  5. JSpencer says:

    Marc, it wouldn't matter if the whole shooting match went over to the right, congress, the SC (oh wait, they already have that) Palin for prez and maybe some family research council type for VP, whatever. They could finish what they started with GWB, and take our country the rest of the way down the tubes and into the dark ages, but here's the kicker: Thier devotees would STILL be proclaiming the virtues of thier party and STILL be demonizing the left long after the left had thrown their hands up in disgust and walked out. Ah well, that speculation makes for good comedy but I don't think we're ready to embrace that dark tragedy as our national coda. . . . . yet.

  6. JeffersonDavis says:

    Marc,

    Nice rant. It would probably have been better to unleash that one on your therapist.

    The President will not and should not resign. He may actually win a second term, especially if Sarah Palin is on deck. He'll have a harder time winning reelection if Mike Huckabee is chosen to run.

    As for the Congress, I lay 95% of the blame at THEIR feet. Congress will, indeed, get a new majority (at least in the Senate). And that is a good thing, even if it's the scummy republicans – since NO party needs to have total power in America. The entire Congressional lack of ethics and self-discipline WILL change one way or another.

  7. Father_Time says:

    As long as republicans stick to two thirds majority or filibuster within the Senate, by voting as a minority block, there is little the democrats can do. Obstructionism is the General Obstruction Party’s (GOP) reason for existence.

  8. Silhouette says:

    Fabio S, the first nation to perfect and market cutting edge alternatives to oil is going to “win” the market of the 21st Century. China and India will only do business with the Middle East as long as they don't have great alternatives that we are trading with them.

    You republicans better get that through your slick oily heads. In the market, oil is out, alternatives are IN. Invest wisely grasshopper[s]….

  9. DLS says:

    Never mind the numerous smaller details, like the mistaken views of rail travel in the USA, again –

    “You don’t have the ability, will[,] or 'Cojones' to actually enact any of your policies or even run a major government.”

    Actually, the problem the Dems have had this past year is that they have tried going too far left. Are you one of those who actually believes they didn't go far left enough and needed to do more of this rather than less? (Do you really want more, not less, future Republican power in Washington thanks to your own efforts?)

  10. DLS says:

    “The President will not and should not resign. He may actually win a second term”

    He may or may not run again. Obamaniacs always were wrong to predict (even before he won his first term, it seems) his successful re-election. Right now he's a “C” grade president. No reason to cast him aside for someone else unless the someone else is better, and we have three whole years to go first.

    He could easily not run for re-election, do something else, then run again in 2016 or 2020 (though we'll be in such awful shape, probably, by then, for years afterward, that neither he nor anyone else may want the job then).

    No, the person lefties should anticipate may resign, and they'll welcome it, and possibly righties, too, is

    Rahm Emanuel

    now that Plouffe is being brought into the administration.

    As for the other(s) who should go — we can give them until the 2010 elections, to see if they along with other Dems have reformed their previous year's bad ways. If not, they should go, after the elections this November, if not earlier:

    Geithner (and possibly Summers, too)

  11. rdl114 says:

    Moderate Voice? Ha ha ha ha ha…. where are you, in Germany in 1936? Time travel must be great. Join us in the 21st century. Thanks for the laugh.

  12. rdl114 says:

    Too far left of what? Out of control price gouging by insurance companies, corporatized hospitals, and money mad drug companies? Why don't you take off your sniper cami outfit and give us the solution to 50 million uninsured and another 30 million under insured. Don't you realize we are already paying for these people through ER visits at a thousand bucks a pop? Make some sense. Have some ideas.

  13. DLS says:

    “Too far left of what?”

    Too far left of the mainstream,

    “your sniper cami outfit”

    as you illustrate.

  14. It will be great to see the faces of the mainstream when they realize that they are incapable of meeting the future.

  15. JeffersonDavis says:

    “Rahm Emanuel…..resigning”

    You may be right, DLS. As a whole, people tend to personally like President Obama. The people he has surrounded himself with, on the other hand, are well hated by most (much like Cheney was).

    He'll perform an internal purge and embark on a Clinton-esque campaign of centrism.

  16. DLS says:

    “He'll perform an internal purge and embark on a Clinton-esque campaign of centrism.”

    This is a good bet.  How well he does it compared to Clinton, remains to be seen.

    That reminds me of something: When Clinton had no respect among Americans, was doomed in 1996 (before the GOP chose to be stupid and offer Bob Dole to challenge him for the White House), and had many Americans openly saying that they'd prefer to have Carter back in the White House again, as an improvement.  That was mainly due to misconduct, rather than failure or perceived ineptitude, but it's interesting that on a local talk radio show, I heard something mentioned that has begun to emerge — the beginnings of wondering openly if we wouldn't be better off with Bill Clinton back in the White House.

    ObamaCo (and the Congre-Dems) were given a chance by a nearly all their critics, as well as all their fans, at the end of 2008 and the start of 2009, and in a number of ways they have failed miserably.  They remain almost wholly in charge of Washington and it remains fully up to them to salvage their reputation, or ruin it additionally between now and November.  Unlike the New York Times, normal people won't accept blaming Bush any longer.

  17. JeffersonDavis says:

    ” I heard something mentioned that has begun to emerge — the beginnings of wondering openly if we wouldn't be better off with Bill Clinton back in the White House.”

    And that is the beginnings of a possible primary challenge by Hillary in 2012.

  18. DLS says:

    “a possible primary challenge by Hillary in 2012″

    There's nothing wrong with it, either.

    I actually feel sorry about though will also be amused by the predicament faced once again by lefties, especially those caught up in reverse-discriminatory PC “identity politics” — which to choose, Clinton or Obama? — in such a circumstance.

© 2003-2011 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Mode Equity