Comments on: The Longstanding Operation To Protect George Bush On Iraq

By: Phil Prescott

Phil Prescott — Sat, 01 Apr 2006 01:38:22 +0000

The simple fact is that this administration has been a total slave of the CIA, is a scared, reactionary neo-conservative fascist regime and is also now ever more clearly seen as guilty of both sedition and war crimes.

Bush never even spoke to Hussein personally before admittedly murdering 30-50,000 people in cold blood to chase one $5 nuisance opponent into a hole in the ground over nothing more than totally erroneous military industrial innuendo. Saddam’s government’s ‘crime’ was in providing financial assistance to the survivors of Palestinian ‘terrorists’ perhaps the most popular thing he ever did in all his years as a bumbling puppet in Baghdad

America’s crime was a premeditated assualt on thousands of innocent, defenceless people by immoral cowards fighting for their perverse religious-socialist notions of ‘right’ from the edge of outer space.

By: Dale J. Thomas

Dale J. Thomas — Fri, 31 Mar 2006 17:44:53 +0000

I do not know why this revelation is so suprising people. Aren’t we forgetting that this president had access to the same CIA data that suggested Iraq had no WMD.

By: Pyst

Pyst — Fri, 31 Mar 2006 15:37:28 +0000

I heard him declare those tubes were for uranium enrichment purposes, and never for anything else. He chose his words like a caveman chooses a club.

By: AustinRoth

AustinRoth — Fri, 31 Mar 2006 05:16:43 +0000

But Bush didn’t say they were being purchased for uranium enrichment, but that they were suitable for such a use.

If you are going to dress him down because while the majority of the opinions were that they were for enrichment uses, and two departments thought it ‘more likely’ (hardly a firm position itself) that they were for non-nuclear uses, and subsequently he didn’t spell out in a speech the inter-departmental differences in opinion, then give him credit for choosing his words carefully.