In that way you get moderate judges appointed, and true checks and balances throughout government.

It worked through the Clinton years.

No individual issue is more important.

But we have a new paradigm of economics. For example suppose your house increases just 15% a year, it’s a lot more in other places. In just 5 years it will have doubled. So if you have a $200,000 house and take out $20,000 a year in 5 years you will have made $100,000 in savings.

But wait there’s more!

The house will increase 8 times in 20 years and 256 times in 40. In 50 years it will have increased 1,000 times. Which means you can take a million dollars a year out of your house and still have a 150 million to give to your kids. But democrats want to rob you with the death tax.

This new paradim applies to all of our economic situation. Like your house the American economy just keeps going up in value. Which is why people all over the world want to lend us money. And the more money we borrow the more money we have to buy their stuff which gives them more money to lend us. It’s a win win situation.

So if we pursue this process and expand it rather than borrow a teensy eensy 500 billion a year to pay for government we could borrow 3 trillion or so which would let us have a negative tax for those making over $100,000 which would further stir the economy.

But Democrats with ungood thoughts are trying to do to this what they’ve tried to with Iraq. Just look at them, we proved there wasn’t a civil war and the traitors report dead bodies all over the place, our ambassador accusing the Interior Ministry of killing more civilians than the insurgents and us fightingbthe militia which keeps so much of Baghdad and the south a success story.

Now why did they do this? Because they hate America and even though Iraq is a great success they undermine it with double plus ungood thinking. We even changed the definition of civil war from that used by political scientists to one we like and next thing you know they try to copy our definition.

They are trying to do the same thing with the economy which is why we know they practice socialism. If housing falls or the dollar falls or we have a recession it’s because they broke our new paradigm.
But if Republicans get elected we can have no taxes at all and twice as much spending and win in Iraq twice a day rather than only achieving total victory 3 or 4 times a year.

Double plus good thoughts are the way to go!!!!!

It’s a good sign when your enemy is this intent on self-delusion as this bunch.

What did they say about the likely outcome of the elections of 2002?

I have to say that when I read your stuff I feel like I’m getting the straight dope – more so than I any time I can remember beside this guide to abominable footwear.

However it’s time we stopped using such language because it implies that the Democrats actually have an agenda, but as Brian says all the do is obstruct. Therefore through the use of semantics (such as redfining the commin definition of civil war to show there isn’t one in Iraq) do define reailty I say we refer to them as “ungood.”

This way we define them as mere shadows, negatives of true humans, anti Republicans. We can also have categories depending on their level of evil. Thus Osama and Stalin are ungood, those who pretended to be our friends such as the French are “plus ungood” and those who have stabbed their mother country in the back such as Democrats are “double plus ungood.” This way we can define our priorities. And destroy the greatest evil first.

Bill Clinton is of course “super whooper ungood.”

I am one of those that want gridlock. I believe the Democrats will start offering policies once they are allowed to have a voice in one of the branches of government again. Considering how moderate Republicans rarely get a place at the table, much less members of the opposing party, I’d keep my cards tight to the vest as well. However I don’t think the Democrats can out campaign the GOP. They proved it in 2002 and 2004. Nothing has fundamentally changed about their leadership that suggests they have gotten any better. I hope and pray that they do, but I won’t hold my breath. 2004 was the first year I voted for Democrats. I will continue to do so until non-ideologues and religious right politicians lose control of the Republican party.

Frankly, I would be disappointed with the American people if they do vote for democrats. The party has done nothing for the American people. All they have done is obstruct, and normally Americans do not like obstructionists.

I would like the democrat party to come back to their roots, and actually have an agenda that does not include spending more money, raising my taxes, and taking away my right to self defense.

As a whole I wish they would become an American party again, instead of the socialist party they have become.

Suckers