<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNN Speaks!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/5515/cnn-speaks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/5515/cnn-speaks/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:16:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Heinz</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/5515/cnn-speaks/comment-page-1/#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Heinz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 02:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/2006/01/06/uncategorized/cnn-speaks/#comment-389</guid>
		<description>Okay, this whole thing is weirding me out.

First, we have a scandal that began when unnamed sources claimed that Bush was illegally wiretapping unnamed Americans at unnamed times. 

Bush&#039;s defense to this was, &quot;I do, in fact, wiretap unnamed Americans at unnamed times but it&#039;s legal and, besides, they were talking to unnamed terrorists.&quot;

So, now we have a website that publishes transcript that includes a question and then said website edits the transcript and deletes the question. A scandal started by a story that has no source at all!

And Bush&#039;s defense to this is &quot;I have not had wire tapping relations with that journalist!&quot; 

I&#039;m waiting for the next episode, where it turns out that the reporter Bush was eavesdropping on was actually Greenspan&#039;s wife - he was trying to get an inside tip on short term interest rates so he could do some insider trading.

Seriously, can this whole story get any more bizarre?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, this whole thing is weirding me out.</p>
<p>First, we have a scandal that began when unnamed sources claimed that Bush was illegally wiretapping unnamed Americans at unnamed times. </p>
<p>Bush&#8217;s defense to this was, &#8220;I do, in fact, wiretap unnamed Americans at unnamed times but it&#8217;s legal and, besides, they were talking to unnamed terrorists.&#8221;</p>
<p>So, now we have a website that publishes transcript that includes a question and then said website edits the transcript and deletes the question. A scandal started by a story that has no source at all!</p>
<p>And Bush&#8217;s defense to this is &#8220;I have not had wire tapping relations with that journalist!&#8221; </p>
<p>I&#8217;m waiting for the next episode, where it turns out that the reporter Bush was eavesdropping on was actually Greenspan&#8217;s wife &#8211; he was trying to get an inside tip on short term interest rates so he could do some insider trading.</p>
<p>Seriously, can this whole story get any more bizarre?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

