An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

How Many Years Make Up a Political Eternity?

Chris Cillizza suggests the answer is somewhere around a half century, as illustrated by a timeline map of presidential and congressional elections, 1960-2008, put together by Cillizza’s WaPo colleagues. Of their work, he writes:

Need a shocker? Compare the map that elected Jimmy Carter president in 1976 — a solidly Democratic south counterbalanced by a solidly Republican west coast — and the one that elected Barack Obama in 2008 — the northeast and west coast for Obama, the plains and south for Sen. John McCain (Ariz.).

Earlier in the same post, Cillizza links to commentary by former National Republican Congressional Committee chair Tom Davis, who suggests a single year is all that’s needed to measure political eternity:

The 2009 off-year elections in Virginia, New Jersey, and New York’s 23d Congressional District offer a small snapshot of the current views and motivations of the American electorate. While there may be a desire to extrapolate the events of Nov. 3, 2009 into a prediction of what will happen on Nov. 2, 2010, that is impossible. A year is an eternity in politics, and there are many variables that will affect the mood of the electorate …

Davis goes on to offer “seven key lessons” from last week’s elections. My favorite of his many points is this “pox on both your houses” claim:

Voter anger is directed against the political establishment, which happens to be dominated by Democrats. However, it would be a mistake to read this as a pro-Republican trend.

  • JSpencer
    Would be nice if Americans had a better sense of history and better clarity about the present system. Then maybe they could disconnect themselves from that swinging pendulum dynamic and start moving in a forward direction.
  • DLS
    Addressing the technical issue seriously:

    For the long term, the period is around 20-25 years, psychologically. As I noted about this on another thread, this is also the suitable max length for things like government (or corporate) bonds (longest term, that is), length of time things like bankruptcies should be on record, the length of time for a serious jail or prison term for a serious crime, and the longest term for elected or other government offices (including, in our nation's example, Justices of the Supreme Court and other judicial officials -- outlasting the time all others should be limited to being in office, for shorter terms). To name one other pertinent example, it is the time period for which income from property or business owned by private parties should be compensated if properties are taken or private business is made non-profit, public, or prohibited.

    It's about a generation. Note the coincidence.
  • JeffersonDavis
    Well said, Spence.

    There is a lot more "not letting go" after the 2008 election than any others in my memory. But the feeling of not being represented is growing in America. Some, if not a good portion, of the discontent comes from that feeling that has been brewing for the past 3 election cycles. Ross Perot hit on something in 92 that went unresolved. Had he not been such a clown and had he not been destroyed by the GOP, he may have won. Bill Clinton did a decent job to take people's minds off of it but our nation remained divided. Then came Bush and our nation divided even more. Now, here we sit still divided, with an economy in ruins and a President that is a mystery at best. The collective American psyche is paranoid, uncertain, and afraid - and not because of what Olbermann and Limbaugh tell us. This goes much deeper than that.

    I think the electoral map speeks volumes in this respect.
  • DLS
    It calls again for proportional representation and approval voting, fracturing of the two major political parties into 4-6+ parties, and revising the Congressional districts and even possible replacement of House member elections with random selection ("jury duty" or "conscription") to improve the quality of representation. (More ambitious revisions of the states and state-federal government relations, as well as more conventional improvements and corrections like term limits, changing duration of terms, and so on, are also sadly out of reach in the current environment and given the current state of affairs of the public as well as of government.)
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC