Comments on: Steele: GOP “Transcendent”

By: DLS

DLS — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:56:32 +0000

"I was going to offer the stage to anyone that had their own additions so feel free."

The ghostwriters, who would probably be more interesting to note than the "authors," remain anonymous.

Come to think of it, don't they choose to be anonymous these days, for GOP or conservative "authors"?

It's kind of like avoiding having Bush appear with you and endorse you at campaign appearances last year.

By: DLS

DLS — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:54:09 +0000

Well, many a lib and Dem mouthpiece has once again exposed their idiocy by making statements disparaging and denying what happened Tuesday. That is no surprise, pathetic as it is. Had they any more sense, they'd be concentrating more on the numbers and asking why the hard-core more-activist Obama-faithful voters failed to turn out as did the many who reflected the nation's concerns with the state of affairs in this country as well as how the Dems currently have been mismanaging things and otherwise misbehaving. (The far left, meanwhile, also admits in its own way the Dems — and Dem voters Tuesday, it may be — are incoherent and dysfunctional. The far left is impatient with the stalled “progress” in Washington. It was entertaining to listen to Ed Schultz scream about this.)

By: shannonlee

shannonlee — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:48:44 +0000

It is a marketing problem. Remove Steele from your headline and watch the hits come in.

By: mikkel

mikkel — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:47:40 +0000

I was going to offer the stage to anyone that had their own additions so feel free.

By: mikkel

mikkel — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:47:02 +0000

Oh so it's Steele that is the issue? I thought it was more about the puns on allusions to 150 year old literature.

By: StockBoySF

StockBoySF — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:25:20 +0000

LOL! Thanks, that was good. Please feel free to continue.

By: shannonlee

shannonlee — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:46:51 +0000

Steele is so irrelevant that no one is bothering to comment.