Comments on: Fred Hiatt Praises Agreement to Restore Zelaya to Office http://themoderatevoice.com/51337/fred-hiatt-praises-agreement-to-restore-zelaya-to-office/ An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:27:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2 By: AustinRoth http://themoderatevoice.com/51337/fred-hiatt-praises-agreement-to-restore-zelaya-to-office/comment-page-1/#comment-227168 AustinRoth Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:02:14 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51337#comment-227168 The Military's role, which they overstepped, was to secure the ex-President. No one denies removing him from the country was illegal. But it was the Legislature and the Supreme Court that that removed him as President. The Military was not involved in that decision. The Military's role, which they overstepped, was to secure the ex-President. No one denies removing him from the country was illegal. But it was the Legislature and the Supreme Court that that removed him as President. The Military was not involved in that decision.

]]> By: dduck12 http://themoderatevoice.com/51337/fred-hiatt-praises-agreement-to-restore-zelaya-to-office/comment-page-1/#comment-227167 dduck12 Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:01:43 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51337#comment-227167 Read the Library of Congress Report. Read the Library of Congress Report.

]]> By: spirasol http://themoderatevoice.com/51337/fred-hiatt-praises-agreement-to-restore-zelaya-to-office/comment-page-1/#comment-227166 spirasol Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:27:17 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51337#comment-227166 "unambiguous".... C'mon. So there are two parts to it. The first part says "available sources" which does not sound clear or exhaustive and "indicates" would appear to point but not underscore the so called "facts" of the government case. And based on the above I would say that these questionable "democratic" moves were then followed by a completely illegal move of kidnapping the president and transporting him out of the country.<br><br>In what democratic hell, can a military and a plotting judiciary simply remove a sitting president? “unambiguous”…. C'mon. So there are two parts to it. The first part says “available sources” which does not sound clear or exhaustive and “indicates” would appear to point but not underscore the so called “facts” of the government case. And based on the above I would say that these questionable “democratic” moves were then followed by a completely illegal move of kidnapping the president and transporting him out of the country.

In what democratic hell, can a military and a plotting judiciary simply remove a sitting president?

]]> By: spirasol http://themoderatevoice.com/51337/fred-hiatt-praises-agreement-to-restore-zelaya-to-office/comment-page-1/#comment-227160 spirasol Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:27:17 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51337#comment-227160 "unambiguous".... C'mon. So there are two parts to it. The first part says "available sources" which does not sound clear or exhaustive and "indicates" would appear to point but not underscore the so called "facts" of the government case. And based on the above I would say that these questionable "democratic" moves were then followed by a completely illegal move of kidnapping the president and transporting him out of the country.<br><br>In what democratic hell, can a military and a plotting judiciary simply remove a sitting president? “unambiguous”…. C'mon. So there are two parts to it. The first part says “available sources” which does not sound clear or exhaustive and “indicates” would appear to point but not underscore the so called “facts” of the government case. And based on the above I would say that these questionable “democratic” moves were then followed by a completely illegal move of kidnapping the president and transporting him out of the country.

In what democratic hell, can a military and a plotting judiciary simply remove a sitting president?

]]> By: spirasol http://themoderatevoice.com/51337/fred-hiatt-praises-agreement-to-restore-zelaya-to-office/comment-page-1/#comment-227155 spirasol Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:27:17 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51337#comment-227155 "unambiguous".... C'mon. So there are two parts to it. The first part says "available sources" which does not sound clear or exhaustive and "indicates" would appear to point but not underscore the so called "facts" of the government case. And based on the above I would say that these questionable "democratic" moves were then followed by a completely illegal move of kidnapping the president and transporting him out of the country.<br><br>In what democratic hell, can a military and a plotting judiciary simply remove a sitting president? “unambiguous”…. C'mon. So there are two parts to it. The first part says “available sources” which does not sound clear or exhaustive and “indicates” would appear to point but not underscore the so called “facts” of the government case. And based on the above I would say that these questionable “democratic” moves were then followed by a completely illegal move of kidnapping the president and transporting him out of the country.

In what democratic hell, can a military and a plotting judiciary simply remove a sitting president?

]]> By: spirasol http://themoderatevoice.com/51337/fred-hiatt-praises-agreement-to-restore-zelaya-to-office/comment-page-1/#comment-227148 spirasol Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:27:17 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51337#comment-227148 "unambiguous".... C'mon. So there are two parts to it. The first part says "available sources" which does not sound clear or exhaustive and "indicates" would appear to point but not underscore the so called "facts" of the government case. And based on the above I would say that these questionable "democratic" moves were then followed by a completely illegal move of kidnapping the president and transporting him out of the country.<br><br>In what democratic hell, can a military and a plotting judiciary simply remove a sitting president? “unambiguous”…. C'mon. So there are two parts to it. The first part says “available sources” which does not sound clear or exhaustive and “indicates” would appear to point but not underscore the so called “facts” of the government case. And based on the above I would say that these questionable “democratic” moves were then followed by a completely illegal move of kidnapping the president and transporting him out of the country.

In what democratic hell, can a military and a plotting judiciary simply remove a sitting president?

]]> By: spirasol http://themoderatevoice.com/51337/fred-hiatt-praises-agreement-to-restore-zelaya-to-office/comment-page-1/#comment-227145 spirasol Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:27:17 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51337#comment-227145 "unambiguous".... C'mon. So there are two parts to it. The first part says "available sources" which does not sound clear or exhaustive and "indicates" would appear to point but not underscore the so called "facts" of the government case. And based on the above I would say that these questionable "democratic" moves were then followed by a completely illegal move of kidnapping the president and transporting him out of the country.<br><br>In what democratic hell, can a military and a plotting judiciary simply remove a sitting president? “unambiguous”…. C'mon. So there are two parts to it. The first part says “available sources” which does not sound clear or exhaustive and “indicates” would appear to point but not underscore the so called “facts” of the government case. And based on the above I would say that these questionable “democratic” moves were then followed by a completely illegal move of kidnapping the president and transporting him out of the country.

In what democratic hell, can a military and a plotting judiciary simply remove a sitting president?

]]> By: spirasol http://themoderatevoice.com/51337/fred-hiatt-praises-agreement-to-restore-zelaya-to-office/comment-page-1/#comment-227142 spirasol Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:27:17 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51337#comment-227142 "unambiguous".... C'mon. So there are two parts to it. The first part says "available sources" which does not sound clear or exhaustive and "indicates" would appear to point but not underscore the so called "facts" of the government case. And based on the above I would say that these questionable "democratic" moves were then followed by a completely illegal move of kidnapping the president and transporting him out of the country.<br><br>In what democratic hell, can a military and a plotting judiciary simply remove a sitting president? “unambiguous”…. C'mon. So there are two parts to it. The first part says “available sources” which does not sound clear or exhaustive and “indicates” would appear to point but not underscore the so called “facts” of the government case. And based on the above I would say that these questionable “democratic” moves were then followed by a completely illegal move of kidnapping the president and transporting him out of the country.

In what democratic hell, can a military and a plotting judiciary simply remove a sitting president?

]]> By: spirasol http://themoderatevoice.com/51337/fred-hiatt-praises-agreement-to-restore-zelaya-to-office/comment-page-1/#comment-227140 spirasol Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:27:17 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51337#comment-227140 "unambiguous".... C'mon. So there are two parts to it. The first part says "available sources" which does not sound clear or exhaustive and "indicates" would appear to point but not underscore the so called "facts" of the government case. And based on the above I would say that these questionable "democratic" moves were then followed by a completely illegal move of kidnapping the president and transporting him out of the country.<br><br>In what democratic hell, can a military and a plotting judiciary simply remove a sitting president? “unambiguous”…. C'mon. So there are two parts to it. The first part says “available sources” which does not sound clear or exhaustive and “indicates” would appear to point but not underscore the so called “facts” of the government case. And based on the above I would say that these questionable “democratic” moves were then followed by a completely illegal move of kidnapping the president and transporting him out of the country.

In what democratic hell, can a military and a plotting judiciary simply remove a sitting president?

]]> By: spirasol http://themoderatevoice.com/51337/fred-hiatt-praises-agreement-to-restore-zelaya-to-office/comment-page-1/#comment-227136 spirasol Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:27:17 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51337#comment-227136 "unambiguous".... C'mon. So there are two parts to it. The first part says "available sources" which does not sound clear or exhaustive and "indicates" would appear to point but not underscore the so called "facts" of the government case. And based on the above I would say that these questionable "democratic" moves were then followed by a completely illegal move of kidnapping the president and transporting him out of the country.<br><br>In what democratic hell, can a military and a plotting judiciary simply remove a sitting president? “unambiguous”…. C'mon. So there are two parts to it. The first part says “available sources” which does not sound clear or exhaustive and “indicates” would appear to point but not underscore the so called “facts” of the government case. And based on the above I would say that these questionable “democratic” moves were then followed by a completely illegal move of kidnapping the president and transporting him out of the country.

In what democratic hell, can a military and a plotting judiciary simply remove a sitting president?

]]> By: spirasol http://themoderatevoice.com/51337/fred-hiatt-praises-agreement-to-restore-zelaya-to-office/comment-page-1/#comment-227131 spirasol Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:27:17 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51337#comment-227131 "unambiguous".... C'mon. So there are two parts to it. The first part says "available sources" which does not sound clear or exhaustive and "indicates" would appear to point but not underscore the so called "facts" of the government case. And based on the above I would say that these questionable "democratic" moves were then followed by a completely illegal move of kidnapping the president and transporting him out of the country.<br><br>In what democratic hell, can a military and a plotting judiciary simply remove a sitting president? “unambiguous”…. C'mon. So there are two parts to it. The first part says “available sources” which does not sound clear or exhaustive and “indicates” would appear to point but not underscore the so called “facts” of the government case. And based on the above I would say that these questionable “democratic” moves were then followed by a completely illegal move of kidnapping the president and transporting him out of the country.

In what democratic hell, can a military and a plotting judiciary simply remove a sitting president?

]]> By: spirasol http://themoderatevoice.com/51337/fred-hiatt-praises-agreement-to-restore-zelaya-to-office/comment-page-1/#comment-227121 spirasol Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:27:17 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51337#comment-227121 "unambiguous".... C'mon. So there are two parts to it. The first part says "available sources" which does not sound clear or exhaustive and "indicates" would appear to point but not underscore the so called "facts" of the government case. And based on the above I would say that these questionable "democratic" moves were then followed by a completely illegal move of kidnapping the president and transporting him out of the country.<br><br>In what democratic hell, can a military and a plotting judiciary simply remove a sitting president? “unambiguous”…. C'mon. So there are two parts to it. The first part says “available sources” which does not sound clear or exhaustive and “indicates” would appear to point but not underscore the so called “facts” of the government case. And based on the above I would say that these questionable “democratic” moves were then followed by a completely illegal move of kidnapping the president and transporting him out of the country.

In what democratic hell, can a military and a plotting judiciary simply remove a sitting president?

]]> By: spirasol http://themoderatevoice.com/51337/fred-hiatt-praises-agreement-to-restore-zelaya-to-office/comment-page-1/#comment-227114 spirasol Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:27:17 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51337#comment-227114 "unambiguous".... C'mon. So there are two parts to it. The first part says "available sources" which does not sound clear or exhaustive and "indicates" would appear to point but not underscore the so called "facts" of the government case. And based on the above I would say that these questionable "democratic" moves were then followed by a completely illegal move of kidnapping the president and transporting him out of the country.<br><br>In what democratic hell, can a military and a plotting judiciary simply remove a sitting president? “unambiguous”…. C'mon. So there are two parts to it. The first part says “available sources” which does not sound clear or exhaustive and “indicates” would appear to point but not underscore the so called “facts” of the government case. And based on the above I would say that these questionable “democratic” moves were then followed by a completely illegal move of kidnapping the president and transporting him out of the country.

In what democratic hell, can a military and a plotting judiciary simply remove a sitting president?

]]> By: spirasol http://themoderatevoice.com/51337/fred-hiatt-praises-agreement-to-restore-zelaya-to-office/comment-page-1/#comment-227112 spirasol Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:27:17 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51337#comment-227112 "unambiguous".... C'mon. So there are two parts to it. The first part says "available sources" which does not sound clear or exhaustive and "indicates" would appear to point but not underscore the so called "facts" of the government case. And based on the above I would say that these questionable "democratic" moves were then followed by a completely illegal move of kidnapping the president and transporting him out of the country.<br><br>In what democratic hell, can a military and a plotting judiciary simply remove a sitting president? “unambiguous”…. C'mon. So there are two parts to it. The first part says “available sources” which does not sound clear or exhaustive and “indicates” would appear to point but not underscore the so called “facts” of the government case. And based on the above I would say that these questionable “democratic” moves were then followed by a completely illegal move of kidnapping the president and transporting him out of the country.

In what democratic hell, can a military and a plotting judiciary simply remove a sitting president?

]]> By: spirasol http://themoderatevoice.com/51337/fred-hiatt-praises-agreement-to-restore-zelaya-to-office/comment-page-1/#comment-227111 spirasol Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:27:17 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51337#comment-227111 "unambiguous".... C'mon. So there are two parts to it. The first part says "available sources" which does not sound clear or exhaustive and "indicates" would appear to point but not underscore the so called "facts" of the government case. And based on the above I would say that these questionable "democratic" moves were then followed by a completely illegal move of kidnapping the president and transporting him out of the country.<br><br>In what democratic hell, can a military and a plotting judiciary simply remove a sitting president? “unambiguous”…. C'mon. So there are two parts to it. The first part says “available sources” which does not sound clear or exhaustive and “indicates” would appear to point but not underscore the so called “facts” of the government case. And based on the above I would say that these questionable “democratic” moves were then followed by a completely illegal move of kidnapping the president and transporting him out of the country.

In what democratic hell, can a military and a plotting judiciary simply remove a sitting president?

]]> By: spirasol http://themoderatevoice.com/51337/fred-hiatt-praises-agreement-to-restore-zelaya-to-office/comment-page-1/#comment-227110 spirasol Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:27:17 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51337#comment-227110 "unambiguous".... C'mon. So there are two parts to it. The first part says "available sources" which does not sound clear or exhaustive and "indicates" would appear to point but not underscore the so called "facts" of the government case. And based on the above I would say that these questionable "democratic" moves were then followed by a completely illegal move of kidnapping the president and transporting him out of the country.<br><br>In what democratic hell, can a military and a plotting judiciary simply remove a sitting president? “unambiguous”…. C'mon. So there are two parts to it. The first part says “available sources” which does not sound clear or exhaustive and “indicates” would appear to point but not underscore the so called “facts” of the government case. And based on the above I would say that these questionable “democratic” moves were then followed by a completely illegal move of kidnapping the president and transporting him out of the country.

In what democratic hell, can a military and a plotting judiciary simply remove a sitting president?

]]> By: spirasol http://themoderatevoice.com/51337/fred-hiatt-praises-agreement-to-restore-zelaya-to-office/comment-page-1/#comment-227107 spirasol Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:27:17 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51337#comment-227107 "unambiguous".... C'mon. So there are two parts to it. The first part says "available sources" which does not sound clear or exhaustive and "indicates" would appear to point but not underscore the so called "facts" of the government case. And based on the above I would say that these questionable "democratic" moves were then followed by a completely illegal move of kidnapping the president and transporting him out of the country.<br><br>In what democratic hell, can a military and a plotting judiciary simply remove a sitting president? “unambiguous”…. C'mon. So there are two parts to it. The first part says “available sources” which does not sound clear or exhaustive and “indicates” would appear to point but not underscore the so called “facts” of the government case. And based on the above I would say that these questionable “democratic” moves were then followed by a completely illegal move of kidnapping the president and transporting him out of the country.

In what democratic hell, can a military and a plotting judiciary simply remove a sitting president?

]]> By: spirasol http://themoderatevoice.com/51337/fred-hiatt-praises-agreement-to-restore-zelaya-to-office/comment-page-1/#comment-227100 spirasol Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:27:17 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51337#comment-227100 "unambiguous".... C'mon. So there are two parts to it. The first part says "available sources" which does not sound clear or exhaustive and "indicates" would appear to point but not underscore the so called "facts" of the government case. And based on the above I would say that these questionable "democratic" moves were then followed by a completely illegal move of kidnapping the president and transporting him out of the country.<br><br>In what democratic hell, can a military and a plotting judiciary simply remove a sitting president? “unambiguous”…. C'mon. So there are two parts to it. The first part says “available sources” which does not sound clear or exhaustive and “indicates” would appear to point but not underscore the so called “facts” of the government case. And based on the above I would say that these questionable “democratic” moves were then followed by a completely illegal move of kidnapping the president and transporting him out of the country.

In what democratic hell, can a military and a plotting judiciary simply remove a sitting president?

]]> By: spirasol http://themoderatevoice.com/51337/fred-hiatt-praises-agreement-to-restore-zelaya-to-office/comment-page-1/#comment-227095 spirasol Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:27:17 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51337#comment-227095 "unambiguous".... C'mon. So there are two parts to it. The first part says "available sources" which does not sound clear or exhaustive and "indicates" would appear to point but not underscore the so called "facts" of the government case. And based on the above I would say that these questionable "democratic" moves were then followed by a completely illegal move of kidnapping the president and transporting him out of the country.<br><br>In what democratic hell, can a military and a plotting judiciary simply remove a sitting president? “unambiguous”…. C'mon. So there are two parts to it. The first part says “available sources” which does not sound clear or exhaustive and “indicates” would appear to point but not underscore the so called “facts” of the government case. And based on the above I would say that these questionable “democratic” moves were then followed by a completely illegal move of kidnapping the president and transporting him out of the country.

In what democratic hell, can a military and a plotting judiciary simply remove a sitting president?

]]> By: spirasol http://themoderatevoice.com/51337/fred-hiatt-praises-agreement-to-restore-zelaya-to-office/comment-page-1/#comment-227088 spirasol Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:27:17 +0000 http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51337#comment-227088 "unambiguous".... C'mon. So there are two parts to it. The first part says "available sources" which does not sound clear or exhaustive and "indicates" would appear to point but not underscore the so called "facts" of the government case. And based on the above I would say that these questionable "democratic" moves were then followed by a completely illegal move of kidnapping the president and transporting him out of the country.<br><br>In what democratic hell, can a military and a plotting judiciary simply remove a sitting president? “unambiguous”…. C'mon. So there are two parts to it. The first part says “available sources” which does not sound clear or exhaustive and “indicates” would appear to point but not underscore the so called “facts” of the government case. And based on the above I would say that these questionable “democratic” moves were then followed by a completely illegal move of kidnapping the president and transporting him out of the country.

In what democratic hell, can a military and a plotting judiciary simply remove a sitting president?

]]>