<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So Much for Tort Reform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/51286/so-much-for-tort-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/51286/so-much-for-tort-reform/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:43:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim_Satterfield</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/51286/so-much-for-tort-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-227333</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim_Satterfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 04:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51286#comment-227333</guid>
		<description>Do you really think that the current crop of Republicans would support those regulations, JD? Seriously? There are certainly some Democrats who join in on this foolish belief that corporations can be trusted to not repeat their previous mistakes or even create new stupidities such as computer programs based on mathematical models that have as their base unwarranted assumptions about home values and mortgages.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as tort reform, conservatives limit themselves (So far as I know.) to the idea of limiting awards. That&#039;s not enough. We need an entire new structure when it comes to anything that has to do with technical and scientific issues, including medicine. Techies want to tear their hair out sometimes because of software patents and patent trolls. No more jurisdiction shopping. No more competing paid experts. A pool of experts in various fields that are treated like someone drawn for jury selection. Then a second panel of &quot;technical judges&quot; would review the decision to see if they catch something that the first crew didn&#039;t. Don&#039;t limit awards since you&#039;ve already taken major steps to eliminate the worst abuses of the current system. There needs to be a real threat of meaningful penalties in this field to avoid &quot;cost benefit analyses&quot; that lead to rationalizations of unacceptable risk. Purely partisan? I judge the Republican Party as I see the people with power in it act.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you really think that the current crop of Republicans would support those regulations, JD? Seriously? There are certainly some Democrats who join in on this foolish belief that corporations can be trusted to not repeat their previous mistakes or even create new stupidities such as computer programs based on mathematical models that have as their base unwarranted assumptions about home values and mortgages.</p>
<p>As far as tort reform, conservatives limit themselves (So far as I know.) to the idea of limiting awards. That&#39;s not enough. We need an entire new structure when it comes to anything that has to do with technical and scientific issues, including medicine. Techies want to tear their hair out sometimes because of software patents and patent trolls. No more jurisdiction shopping. No more competing paid experts. A pool of experts in various fields that are treated like someone drawn for jury selection. Then a second panel of &#8220;technical judges&#8221; would review the decision to see if they catch something that the first crew didn&#39;t. Don&#39;t limit awards since you&#39;ve already taken major steps to eliminate the worst abuses of the current system. There needs to be a real threat of meaningful penalties in this field to avoid &#8220;cost benefit analyses&#8221; that lead to rationalizations of unacceptable risk. Purely partisan? I judge the Republican Party as I see the people with power in it act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blank checks to unelected officials = bad idea &#171; Eternity Matters</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/51286/so-much-for-tort-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-227146</link>
		<dc:creator>Blank checks to unelected officials = bad idea &#171; Eternity Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 14:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51286#comment-227146</guid>
		<description>[...] Preventing tort reform: &#8220;The Secretary shall make an incentive payment, in an amount determined by the Secretary, to each State that has an alternative medical liability law in compliance with this section &#8230;[if] the law does not limit attorneys’ fees or impose caps on damages.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Preventing tort reform: &#8220;The Secretary shall make an incentive payment, in an amount determined by the Secretary, to each State that has an alternative medical liability law in compliance with this section &#8230;[if] the law does not limit attorneys’ fees or impose caps on damages.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: So Much for Tort Reform &#124; The Moderate Voice &#124; Concerned Citizens of Michiana</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/51286/so-much-for-tort-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-227125</link>
		<dc:creator>So Much for Tort Reform &#124; The Moderate Voice &#124; Concerned Citizens of Michiana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 12:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51286#comment-227125</guid>
		<description>[...] The more we learn about the Health Care Bill the less we&#8217;re going to like it, here&#8217;s how they handle tort reform&#8230; So Much for Tort Reform &#124; The Moderate Voice. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The more we learn about the Health Care Bill the less we&#8217;re going to like it, here&#8217;s how they handle tort reform&#8230; So Much for Tort Reform | The Moderate Voice. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JeffersonDavis</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/51286/so-much-for-tort-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-226993</link>
		<dc:creator>JeffersonDavis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 07:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51286#comment-226993</guid>
		<description>Thanks, T.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I find it extremely frustrating to see that people still wear their horse-blinders thinking that their beloved party is so much better than that &quot;evil&quot; party over there on the other side.  I firmly believe that 70% of people in America are clammering for another party.  I know I&#039;m sick and tired of choosing from the lesser of two evils.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The time is ripe for a third/fouth/fith/sixth party out there.  The only way to do it is to totally get rid of the primary system IMHO.  What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, T.</p>
<p>I find it extremely frustrating to see that people still wear their horse-blinders thinking that their beloved party is so much better than that &#8220;evil&#8221; party over there on the other side.  I firmly believe that 70% of people in America are clammering for another party.  I know I&#39;m sick and tired of choosing from the lesser of two evils.</p>
<p>The time is ripe for a third/fouth/fith/sixth party out there.  The only way to do it is to totally get rid of the primary system IMHO.  What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T-Steel</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/51286/so-much-for-tort-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-226992</link>
		<dc:creator>T-Steel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51286#comment-226992</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Regulate the crap out of every industry that has a hand in health care - and that includes Tort Reform and the blood-sucking Trial Lawyers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Healthcare COULD have been reformed in that manner. Instead, both Democrats and Repbulicans fought for their respective corporate interests that continue to line their pockets with cash.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;AMEN JeffersonDavis.  A-to the-Frickin&#039;-MEN!  Both parties are filled to the brim with corporate interests.  Jazz makes some good points.  But ultimately, until we can really limit corporate influence in Congress, we are going to be stuck on slow motion for awhile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Regulate the crap out of every industry that has a hand in health care &#8211; and that includes Tort Reform and the blood-sucking Trial Lawyers.</p>
<p>Healthcare COULD have been reformed in that manner. Instead, both Democrats and Repbulicans fought for their respective corporate interests that continue to line their pockets with cash.</p></blockquote>
<p>AMEN JeffersonDavis.  A-to the-Frickin&#39;-MEN!  Both parties are filled to the brim with corporate interests.  Jazz makes some good points.  But ultimately, until we can really limit corporate influence in Congress, we are going to be stuck on slow motion for awhile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T-Steel</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/51286/so-much-for-tort-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-226982</link>
		<dc:creator>T-Steel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51286#comment-226982</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Regulate the crap out of every industry that has a hand in health care - and that includes Tort Reform and the blood-sucking Trial Lawyers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Healthcare COULD have been reformed in that manner. Instead, both Democrats and Repbulicans fought for their respective corporate interests that continue to line their pockets with cash.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;AMEN JeffersonDavis.  A-to the-Frickin&#039;-MEN!  Both parties are filled to the brim with corporate interests.  Jazz makes some good points.  But ultimately, until we can really limit corporate influence in Congress, we are going to be stuck on slow motion for awhile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Regulate the crap out of every industry that has a hand in health care &#8211; and that includes Tort Reform and the blood-sucking Trial Lawyers.</p>
<p>Healthcare COULD have been reformed in that manner. Instead, both Democrats and Repbulicans fought for their respective corporate interests that continue to line their pockets with cash.</p></blockquote>
<p>AMEN JeffersonDavis.  A-to the-Frickin&#39;-MEN!  Both parties are filled to the brim with corporate interests.  Jazz makes some good points.  But ultimately, until we can really limit corporate influence in Congress, we are going to be stuck on slow motion for awhile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T-Steel</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/51286/so-much-for-tort-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-226958</link>
		<dc:creator>T-Steel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51286#comment-226958</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Regulate the crap out of every industry that has a hand in health care - and that includes Tort Reform and the blood-sucking Trial Lawyers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Healthcare COULD have been reformed in that manner. Instead, both Democrats and Repbulicans fought for their respective corporate interests that continue to line their pockets with cash.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;AMEN JeffersonDavis.  A-to the-Frickin&#039;-MEN!  Both parties are filled to the brim with corporate interests.  Jazz makes some good points.  But ultimately, until we can really limit corporate influence in Congress, we are going to be stuck on slow motion for awhile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Regulate the crap out of every industry that has a hand in health care &#8211; and that includes Tort Reform and the blood-sucking Trial Lawyers.</p>
<p>Healthcare COULD have been reformed in that manner. Instead, both Democrats and Repbulicans fought for their respective corporate interests that continue to line their pockets with cash.</p></blockquote>
<p>AMEN JeffersonDavis.  A-to the-Frickin&#39;-MEN!  Both parties are filled to the brim with corporate interests.  Jazz makes some good points.  But ultimately, until we can really limit corporate influence in Congress, we are going to be stuck on slow motion for awhile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Pelosi’s non-tort reform. &#171; Yuvablog</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/51286/so-much-for-tort-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-226893</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Pelosi’s non-tort reform. &#171; Yuvablog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 04:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51286#comment-226893</guid>
		<description>[...] Hot Air for more, including a link to the actual language and a reminder that the Democrats never had any intention of doing anything at all to disconcert [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hot Air for more, including a link to the actual language and a reminder that the Democrats never had any intention of doing anything at all to disconcert [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JeffersonDavis</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/51286/so-much-for-tort-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-226887</link>
		<dc:creator>JeffersonDavis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 03:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51286#comment-226887</guid>
		<description>Jim....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You really are the most partisan person I read on here.  &quot;Hatred that republicans have for actually reforming anything?&quot;  Come on, bro!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Since this is the Moderate Voice, don&#039;t you think a moderate approach is warranted?&lt;br&gt;Regulate the crap out of every industry that has a hand in health care - and that includes Tort Reform and the blood-sucking Trial Lawyers.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Healthcare COULD have been reformed in that manner.  Instead, both Democrats and Repbulicans fought for their respective corporate interests that continue to line their pockets with cash.  If you think for one second this has something to do with providing the poor with health benefits, go follow the money, become a bit less naive, and then come back and praise your party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim&#8230;.</p>
<p>You really are the most partisan person I read on here.  &#8220;Hatred that republicans have for actually reforming anything?&#8221;  Come on, bro!</p>
<p>Since this is the Moderate Voice, don&#39;t you think a moderate approach is warranted?<br />Regulate the crap out of every industry that has a hand in health care &#8211; and that includes Tort Reform and the blood-sucking Trial Lawyers.  </p>
<p>Healthcare COULD have been reformed in that manner.  Instead, both Democrats and Repbulicans fought for their respective corporate interests that continue to line their pockets with cash.  If you think for one second this has something to do with providing the poor with health benefits, go follow the money, become a bit less naive, and then come back and praise your party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rod769</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/51286/so-much-for-tort-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-226846</link>
		<dc:creator>rod769</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 00:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51286#comment-226846</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim_Satterfield</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/51286/so-much-for-tort-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-226845</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim_Satterfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 00:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51286#comment-226845</guid>
		<description>Actually, Jazz, the foaming at the mouth hatred that Republicans and you have for actually reforming anything is what really knows no bounds. Have the &quot;conservatives&quot; ever proposed any real reforms to the system? No. Simply capping awards is &lt;b&gt;not&lt;/b&gt; reform. Their proposals for what they consider reform of the rest of the system are designed to have loopholes so big that the Oasis of the Seas could sail through with a blind man at the helm. They would in do nothing to improve things in the real world. Only in the Republican fantasy land of what America is like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Jazz, the foaming at the mouth hatred that Republicans and you have for actually reforming anything is what really knows no bounds. Have the &#8220;conservatives&#8221; ever proposed any real reforms to the system? No. Simply capping awards is <b>not</b> reform. Their proposals for what they consider reform of the rest of the system are designed to have loopholes so big that the Oasis of the Seas could sail through with a blind man at the helm. They would in do nothing to improve things in the real world. Only in the Republican fantasy land of what America is like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rod769</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/51286/so-much-for-tort-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-226840</link>
		<dc:creator>rod769</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 00:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51286#comment-226840</guid>
		<description>What else would one expect from a Congress in the United Suits of America?  Trial attorneys and unwarranted litigation are destroying the fabric of this nation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What else would one expect from a Congress in the United Suits of America?  Trial attorneys and unwarranted litigation are destroying the fabric of this nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gazzer&#8217;s Gabfest &#187; Everything you need to know about Pelosi-care, in one sentence*.</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/51286/so-much-for-tort-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-226849</link>
		<dc:creator>Gazzer&#8217;s Gabfest &#187; Everything you need to know about Pelosi-care, in one sentence*.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 00:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51286#comment-226849</guid>
		<description>[...] DC can be found hidden away in Pelosi&#8217;s monstrous almost 2000 page bill, as we see from Jazz Shaw, with regard to states that enact an &#8220;alternative medical liability law&#8221;, (4) CONTENTS [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] DC can be found hidden away in Pelosi&#8217;s monstrous almost 2000 page bill, as we see from Jazz Shaw, with regard to states that enact an &#8220;alternative medical liability law&#8221;, (4) CONTENTS [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheGrandPanjandrum</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/51286/so-much-for-tort-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-226808</link>
		<dc:creator>TheGrandPanjandrum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 21:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51286#comment-226808</guid>
		<description>Maybe the Republicans could have actually fought FOR this particular issue AND argue against other portions of the bill in good faith. That was not the case as we ended up with ridiculous claims of granny being euthanized and &quot;get your gummint hands off my Medicare&quot; from the tea party crowds and their toadies in the House and Senate. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The GOP spent almost no time debating any of this bill or offering anything of substance. If they really wanted tort reform they would have fought for it. They didn&#039;t. Too bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the Republicans could have actually fought FOR this particular issue AND argue against other portions of the bill in good faith. That was not the case as we ended up with ridiculous claims of granny being euthanized and &#8220;get your gummint hands off my Medicare&#8221; from the tea party crowds and their toadies in the House and Senate. </p>
<p>The GOP spent almost no time debating any of this bill or offering anything of substance. If they really wanted tort reform they would have fought for it. They didn&#39;t. Too bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dduck12</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/51286/so-much-for-tort-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-226807</link>
		<dc:creator>dduck12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 21:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51286#comment-226807</guid>
		<description>On a lighter note, the &quot;tort reform&quot; is like the football Lucy used to tee up for Charlie Brown.  Wham, on his back, once again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a lighter note, the &#8220;tort reform&#8221; is like the football Lucy used to tee up for Charlie Brown.  Wham, on his back, once again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/51286/so-much-for-tort-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-226801</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 20:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51286#comment-226801</guid>
		<description>The only kind of reform we&#039;ll see is &quot;relative,&quot; in later years when other Dem interests get as much or more greedy as well as desperate.  It&#039;s something that&#039;s already been dithered with, but merely superficially.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The sleazier Dem crowd&#039;s show will start getting really good (like imprisoned gang members who eventually turn on each other after preying on everybody else) when desperate or greedy Dims in governments start moving in earnest to start taxing punitive damages.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Heh, heh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only kind of reform we&#39;ll see is &#8220;relative,&#8221; in later years when other Dem interests get as much or more greedy as well as desperate.  It&#39;s something that&#39;s already been dithered with, but merely superficially.</p>
<p>The sleazier Dem crowd&#39;s show will start getting really good (like imprisoned gang members who eventually turn on each other after preying on everybody else) when desperate or greedy Dims in governments start moving in earnest to start taxing punitive damages.</p>
<p>Heh, heh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/51286/so-much-for-tort-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-226790</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51286#comment-226790</guid>
		<description>Nobody here has noted aloud yet that 2009-10 DemoCare &quot;tort reform&quot; is likely to be no different than under HillaryCare, which would restrict lawyers&#039; portions of any awards to 33 1/3 per cent, nominally.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[sigh]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody here has noted aloud yet that 2009-10 DemoCare &#8220;tort reform&#8221; is likely to be no different than under HillaryCare, which would restrict lawyers&#39; portions of any awards to 33 1/3 per cent, nominally.</p>
<p>[sigh]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/51286/so-much-for-tort-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-226789</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51286#comment-226789</guid>
		<description>&quot; tort reform was one of the tantalizing potential carrots he offered&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Who believed it?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama said Medicare and other entitlement (Social Security) reform was overdue, and vowed to make the needed reforms, but (especially when the Dems are stampeding to expand entitlements while contining to oppose any and all reforms), who believed it?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;* * *&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Man, the lengths some of you will go to in attempting to defend this boondoggle at every turn are really astounding.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That&#039;s an understatement -- be it lengths or depths.  [scowl]  No surprise, though.  Big bell curve, low tail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; tort reform was one of the tantalizing potential carrots he offered&#8221;</p>
<p>Who believed it?</p>
<p>Obama said Medicare and other entitlement (Social Security) reform was overdue, and vowed to make the needed reforms, but (especially when the Dems are stampeding to expand entitlements while contining to oppose any and all reforms), who believed it?</p>
<p>* * *</p>
<p>&#8220;Man, the lengths some of you will go to in attempting to defend this boondoggle at every turn are really astounding.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#39;s an understatement &#8212; be it lengths or depths.  [scowl]  No surprise, though.  Big bell curve, low tail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/51286/so-much-for-tort-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-226774</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51286#comment-226774</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by TMV: So Much for Tort Reform: As we dig deeper into the behemoth House health care bill, the blatant honesty of Howard De... http://bit.ly/12Nd9q...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by TMV: So Much for Tort Reform: As we dig deeper into the behemoth House health care bill, the blatant honesty of Howard De&#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/12Nd9q.." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/12Nd9q..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Health Care Bill Helps Trial Lawyers Liberal Values</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/51286/so-much-for-tort-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-226773</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Health Care Bill Helps Trial Lawyers Liberal Values</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51286#comment-226773</guid>
		<description>[...] Jazz Shaw points out that the House health care reform bill not only fails to meaningfully address tort reform but also makes it less likely that caps will be placed on claims for non-economic damages as many advocate. The bill provides for incentives for states to consider tort reform&#8211;as long as they don&#8217;t limit attorney fees or place a cap on damages. While conservatives greatly exaggerate the impact of malpractice on health care costs, this is still a cause of unnecessarily wasted money and those serious about reducing health care costs should address this problem. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jazz Shaw points out that the House health care reform bill not only fails to meaningfully address tort reform but also makes it less likely that caps will be placed on claims for non-economic damages as many advocate. The bill provides for incentives for states to consider tort reform&#8211;as long as they don&#8217;t limit attorney fees or place a cap on damages. While conservatives greatly exaggerate the impact of malpractice on health care costs, this is still a cause of unnecessarily wasted money and those serious about reducing health care costs should address this problem. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

