
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Are We Still in Afghanistan?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/51186/why-are-we-still-in-afghanistan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/51186/why-are-we-still-in-afghanistan/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 20:57:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Beasley</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/51186/why-are-we-still-in-afghanistan/comment-page-1/#comment-226490</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Beasley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51186#comment-226490</guid>
		<description>Those dirty hippies, I mean conservatives at the CATO Institute say it&#039;s time to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=10548&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;start winding it down&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those dirty hippies, I mean conservatives at the CATO Institute say it&#39;s time to <a href="http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=10548" rel="nofollow">start winding it down</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/51186/why-are-we-still-in-afghanistan/comment-page-1/#comment-226459</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51186#comment-226459</guid>
		<description>&quot;Unless I&#039;m mistaken, it seems that the tide is rising against sending more troops into Afghanistan.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Without a plan, perhaps.  Only the fringe or the incompetent want us to evacuate promptly, i.e., to flee and advertise it as open once more to terrorists, with our tacit approval and implicit cowardice or surrender to them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The difficulties are mainly two: resolving first the basic strategy, Afghanistan versus Pakistan, rather than air strikes versus a much bigger ground game (and even using the Afghan elections as a pretext for delay is subsidiary); second is placing Afghanistan into the bigger context of regaining control at home (despite the claims at the start of the thread, the main problem at home is the leftist trend this year by the Dems, which has repelled the public increasingly) and resolving health care &quot;reform&quot; as well as getting the Dems to be coherent and under self-control again.  Obama faces multiple problems at once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Unless I&#39;m mistaken, it seems that the tide is rising against sending more troops into Afghanistan.&#8221;</p>
<p>Without a plan, perhaps.  Only the fringe or the incompetent want us to evacuate promptly, i.e., to flee and advertise it as open once more to terrorists, with our tacit approval and implicit cowardice or surrender to them.</p>
<p>The difficulties are mainly two: resolving first the basic strategy, Afghanistan versus Pakistan, rather than air strikes versus a much bigger ground game (and even using the Afghan elections as a pretext for delay is subsidiary); second is placing Afghanistan into the bigger context of regaining control at home (despite the claims at the start of the thread, the main problem at home is the leftist trend this year by the Dems, which has repelled the public increasingly) and resolving health care &#8220;reform&#8221; as well as getting the Dems to be coherent and under self-control again.  Obama faces multiple problems at once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nahummer</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/51186/why-are-we-still-in-afghanistan/comment-page-1/#comment-226450</link>
		<dc:creator>nahummer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51186#comment-226450</guid>
		<description>Unless I&#039;m mistaken, it seems that the tide is rising against sending more troops into Afghanistan. The public was easily confused immediately following 9/11 and didn&#039;t care what the aim of the invasion was, as long as they we&#039;re going to kill some bad guys. Whether it was the Taliban or Al-Qaida made no difference. 8 long years later and the mounting costs are making things look eerily similar to the Soviet experience (good NYT piece today: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/29/opinion/29sebestyen.html?pagewanted=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/29/opinion/29seb...&lt;/a&gt;), or the British experience or the Persian experience, or the...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless I&#39;m mistaken, it seems that the tide is rising against sending more troops into Afghanistan. The public was easily confused immediately following 9/11 and didn&#39;t care what the aim of the invasion was, as long as they we&#39;re going to kill some bad guys. Whether it was the Taliban or Al-Qaida made no difference. 8 long years later and the mounting costs are making things look eerily similar to the Soviet experience (good NYT piece today: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/29/opinion/29sebestyen.html?pagewanted=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/29/opinion/29seb&#8230;</a>), or the British experience or the Persian experience, or the&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: COACHEP &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Posts about Obama Surrenders Afghanistan as of October 29, 2009</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/51186/why-are-we-still-in-afghanistan/comment-page-1/#comment-226463</link>
		<dc:creator>COACHEP &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Posts about Obama Surrenders Afghanistan as of October 29, 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51186#comment-226463</guid>
		<description>[...] Post story is correct , the Obama administration really seems to have taken it to heart.   Why Are We Still in Afghanistan? - themoderatevoice.com 10/29/2009 Yes, yes, to fight the terrorists who attacked us on 9/11. But [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Post story is correct , the Obama administration really seems to have taken it to heart.   Why Are We Still in Afghanistan? &#8211; themoderatevoice.com 10/29/2009 Yes, yes, to fight the terrorists who attacked us on 9/11. But [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JSpencer</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/51186/why-are-we-still-in-afghanistan/comment-page-1/#comment-226411</link>
		<dc:creator>JSpencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=51186#comment-226411</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t we learn anything from the Soviet invasion? This seems about as useful as our idiotic Iraq experience. And of course there is Iran; gee too bad we don&#039;t have that Iraq buffer zone anymore. Darn!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Last time I checked we had quite a few problems right here at home that were far from solved. Maybe we could focus on those for a change eh? Also: &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&quot;China, Russia and Al Qaeda all love the idea of America doing a long, slow bleed in Afghanistan. ~ TF&quot;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;No doubt.&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#39;t we learn anything from the Soviet invasion? This seems about as useful as our idiotic Iraq experience. And of course there is Iran; gee too bad we don&#39;t have that Iraq buffer zone anymore. Darn!</p>
<p>Last time I checked we had quite a few problems right here at home that were far from solved. Maybe we could focus on those for a change eh? Also: </p>
<p>&#8220;China, Russia and Al Qaeda all love the idea of America doing a long, slow bleed in Afghanistan. ~ TF&#8221;</p>
<p>No doubt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

