Comments on: Suicide Bombers Are Better Than Gay Marriage

By: Chocoholic

Chocoholic — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:20:08 +0000

what “other associations”? You mean like NARTH that's run by the Catholic agenda?

By: Chocoholic

Chocoholic — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:19:04 +0000

sexuality is the attraction, sex is the act. Learn the difference. You can have sex with someone without being attracted to them

By: Father_Time

Father_Time — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:59:26 +0000

“sex and sexuality are two completely different things”–

lol

By: Father_Time

Father_Time — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:54:02 +0000

Call them and ask them how many are gay and why other associations do not agree with their gay “opinions”.

By: Chocoholic

Chocoholic — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:49:44 +0000

sex and sexuality are two completely different things. So i believe it is YOUR point that is moot.

By: Chocoholic

Chocoholic — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:15:26 +0000

proof? and the APA is what most psychologists refer to so I don't see how it's biased.

By: Father_Time

Father_Time — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:26:44 +0000

The APA is mostly gay. Find another psychology association please. This one is biased.

By: Father_Time

Father_Time — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:23:04 +0000

People can chose whom they have sex with. Your point is moot and discarded out of hand.

By: Chocoholic

Chocoholic — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:12:39 +0000

wow you definitely failed psychology. h t t p : / / w w w . a p a . o r g / t o p i c s / s o r i e n t a t i o n . p d f
since boards don't particularly like links I've spaced it out. This is a pdf document from the American Psychological Association website. Go learn something. Saying that there is “no proof” when there's pretty much plain as day proof when you open your eyes either shows you are willingly ignorant or pretty dam stupid.

By: roro80

roro80 — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:18:26 +0000

There's no “proof” either way; you must have failed at science, too. There's lots more *evidence* that it is inherent (genetic and/or womb conditions) than choice.

By: Father_Time

Father_Time — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 23:00:11 +0000

Yes it is, and, there is no proof otherwise.

By: Chocoholic

Chocoholic — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:28:43 +0000

You must've failed psychology. Homosexuality isn't a choice.

By: Father_Time

Father_Time — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 11:24:53 +0000

Let me see, the by-line is "by" Mr. Joe Windish.

IMO, Mr. Windish makes a very fair comparison pointing out Catholic hypocrisy regarding homosexuals. Though people throw tomatoes at me all the time here regarding my opinions on homosexuality, I readily admit that it is nonetheless a reality, chosen but real, (IMO).

If I had to make a choice of being around a couple of open and affectionate homosexuals, however chalk board scrape annoying that may be for me, I would much rather do so than be around any creepy catholic priest of which, (IMO), all are full of who knows what kind psychotic or sociopathic demon resides inside their twisted brainwashed mind.

In other words I find Mr. Windish as having one heck-of-an out-of-bounds flaw, but, catholic priests as creepy weirdo’s of the earth never to turn one’s back upon.

By: Father_Time

Father_Time — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:39:53 +0000

No, there are homosexual child molesters and heterosexual child molesters.

There is always a choice. Always.

By: keelaay

keelaay — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:02:24 +0000

I don't agree with the Archdiocese' statement and find it by and large homophobic , but the byline of this blog is demagoguery.

The title of the blog ” Suicide Bombers Are Better Than Gay Marriage” and its following argument very conveniently ignore the straight forward statement from the Archdiocese that “Terrorism as a way to oppose the degeneration of the culture is to be rejected completely since such violence is itself another form of degeneracy.”

By: Chocoholic

Chocoholic — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:57:25 +0000

Fun fact time:
The majority of molesters are heterosexual and NOT homosexual.
Orientation doesn't have much of anything to do with it as much as sex drive.

By: Father_Time

Father_Time — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:16:53 +0000

1) No
2) No

Dang that was an easy test, but completely irrelevant to the point of my comment. A woman is a woman. A man is not.

By: Father_Time

Father_Time — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:12:33 +0000

Truth is sometimes hard.

So you must think that he was “born gay” and was molested by a gay priest because of his youthful sexual prowess overwhelming the gay priest’s gaydar?

By: COACHEP » Blog Archive » Posts about Obama Surrenders Afghanistan as of October 28, 2009

Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:19:40 +0000

[...] [...]

By: pacatrue

pacatrue — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:34:15 +0000

That's a really disgusting thought. Do you also think that every woman who is sexually assaulted was either 1) converted to heterosexuality by her rapist or 2) should give up all sexual behavior for the rest of her life?

Dang, that was a sick comment.