An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Sex, Silicone, and Suits: Miss California Goes a-Courtin’

by Walter Brasch

There’s a cat fight going on in the Miss USA operation—and it isn’t pretty.

It began when an openly gay judge asked Miss California, Carrie Prejean, what she thought about same sex marriage. Prejean, a student at San Diego Christian College, said that although she recognizes and accepts that others may believe in same-sex marriage, “I think I believe that marriage should be between a man and a woman.” That created a firestorm of publicity for the Trump-owned organization. A large minority of Americans said they supported Prejean’s opinion. A large minority said she was reciting biased lessons of intolerance; Perez Hilton, the judge who had asked the question, on his blog called Prejean “a dumb bitch.” However, several prominent gay rights activists defended Prejean’s right to her opinion.

Pageant officials had ordered all of its contestants not to mention God on their applications or at any public event. Apparently, openly believing in God could be seen as detrimental to an organization which holds its beauty contest in Las Vegas, also known as Sin City, USA. Prejean’s view about gay marriage, she later said, was based upon her religious beliefs.

Prejean was second in the Miss USA contest itself; her views may have cost her the national crown.

The Miss California organization claimed that since the pageant in April, Prejean missed scheduled events and lied about pre-pageant semi-nude pictures of her, all of which showed her back and only a portion of a breast. A month after Donald Trump had strongly defended Prejean and her right of free speech, he approved the pageant stripping her crown. Prejean, who said the Pageant’s action was retaliation against her views, sued for libel.

In October, the Miss California organization countersued, claiming Prejean owes it $5,200 for what it claims is a loan it made so she could get breast augmentation. In its countersuit, the organizers and officials claimed Prejean “attempts to cast herself as a virtuous young woman and the victim in a supposed conspiracy against her.” The suit also accused her of having a “new-found notoriety [and] an inflated sense of self.” This, of course, is the organization headed by a man who beneath a blonde pompadour enjoys firing reality shows contestants. This is also an organization whose backstage manipulations could make Chicago politics or New York’s Tammany Hall organization appear to be little more than grade school cliques.

The Miss USA pageant claims its contestants are “savvy, goal-oriented and aware.” In a pompous arrogance of self-deceit it even claims that contestants “display those characteristics in their everyday lives, both as individuals, who compete with hope of advancing their careers, personal and humanitarian goals, and as women who seek to improve the lives of others.” The organization, like the Miss America contest, also requires its contestants to be single, never married, never pregnant and, apparently, never nude.

What it doesn’t require is that its contestants have natural beauty or wisdom. There are coaches to train them in voice and poise. There are coaches who train them in what questions will be asked of them, and how to respond in the most circumscribed way possible to avoid showing they have any opinions. There are coaches to tell them what bikini, ball gown, or casual wear looks best on them. There are hair dressers and makeup artists. There are weight coaches and trainers—since pageant officials and their public audience undoubtedly believe that anyone over size 4 is morbidly obese. The contestants go to suntan parlors, and slather lotions and sprays to get an even tan to pretend that they’re sun-drenched gorgeous. They use double-edge sticky tape to keep skimpy clothes from falling from almost-emaciated bodies, as well as to enhance whatever it is that needs enhancing or reducing. They get cosmetic surgery on cheeks, belly buttons, and their breasts, apparently to enhance or modify whatever genetics—or, in the case of the highly religious, whatever God—has given them.

Like any good media celebrity, Carrie Prejean has written . . . or co-written . . . or had someone else write an autobiography. This one will be published in November. The Miss California organization has just assured increased sales by publicly demanding all royalties from the book, because its stable of cookie-cutter perfect beauties can’t say, write, or do anything without its permission, even after they are dumped as employees.

Unfortunately, cosmetic surgery and breast augmentation are something it does approve.

[Walter Brasch's latest books are Sex and the Single Beer Can: Probing the Media and American Culture and Sinking the Ship of State: The Presidency of George W. Bush. Brasch is a syndicated award-winning columnist, author of 16 books, and a university professor of journalism. You may contact him through www.walterbrasch.com]

  • Father_Time
    Perez Hilton asked her a politically loaded question then berates her for her honest answer. What is a freak like Perez Hilton doing judging beautiful women anyway? Let it go judge a gay butt contest or something more suitable.

    I COMPLETELY AGREE with Mr. Trump’s free speech defense of this strange, but beautiful young woman whom HAS EVERY RIGHT TO HER OPINION! Especially when asked!
  • tidbits
    The Carrie Prejean debacle seems a bit of overblown fluff for the tabloid press and tv. But, there is a more serious lesson to be learned from our obsession with these beauty/poise/presentation contests. She probably has been punished for a non-pc answer, but she has also profitted and will continue to do so. We all know who the Miss USA runner-up was. Someone name the winner...without researching the question.

    Culturally we are fixated on beauty, controversy, watching people fall from grace, rewarding those who pander to our licivious nature. It is superficiality, elevated to high art and drama, and it has spilled over into nearly every crevice of who we are..
  • roro80
    Interesting post. I've got two things to add.

    "Pageant officials had ordered all of its contestants not to mention God on their applications or at any public event. Apparently, openly believing in God could be seen as detrimental to an organization which holds its beauty contest in Las Vegas, also known as Sin City, USA."

    As an ex-pageant winner (local/state -- different organization from this one), I can tell you the reason for this is quite different than the one you site here. Essentially, it's been historically pretty impossible to win one of these things -- at any level -- if you're not open and vocal about your Christianity. They can't ask you "do you believe in God?" or "what religion are you?" any more (they most certainly used to), but they can and do ask things like "what do you do during a typical weekend?" If you don't answer "Church Jesus God Church God Worship Jesus, thank you Lord!", you're pretty much out. This is still a problem, but not being able to mention God on the application has been mildly helpful. Quite frankly, it does give me a bit of a smile to see the tables turned for once.

    "What it doesn’t require is that its contestants have natural beauty or wisdom."

    I thought this whole paragraph was pretty fascinating. It makes me think of the old books where they talk of the "most beautiful woman in the world". We all know that doesn't really exist today, but I've been thinking maybe it did a few centuries ago. The most beautiful woman in the world is the one who has creamy skin without Noxema or Acutane, has white, straight teeth without dentistry or orthodontia or Crest White Strips, has boobs without surgery, has soft hands and feet without a mani/pedi, has rosy lips and cheeks and long eyelashes without makeup, and has a perfect bum without a personal trainer. There may have been exactly one of these women out there within any particular easily-travelable radius 500 years ago.
  • roro80
    Father_Time --
    Thank you for being so horribly predictable. You don't "agree" with Mr. Trumps free speech defense, you agree with Carrie's opinion. If she had said she thinks all gay people should be able to marry, you wouldn't be talking about how "beautiful" she is, and you know it.
  • casualobserver
    Ya gotta love the compelling logic of lefties..........criticize a person for intolerant views towards other's lifestyle choices while simultaneously exuding profuse intolerance for that person's lifestyle choices.
  • roro80
    casual -- your comment is one of my "favorite" criticisms by righties of lefites. It's so very smug, and you're so sure that you've caught us in some sort of hypocrisy. If you think about it for more than 2 seconds, it's not at all hypocritical. You fail at thinking for those 2 seconds.
  • Father_Time
    What, this beautiful homosapien female stops being beautiful because of political opinion?

    Do you realize how absolutely sick you have become?

    Take a deep breath and stay away from campaign headquarters for awhile.
  • roro80
    Hahahaha! That's hilarious, F-T.
  • Father_Time
    It's a contest.

    It's a human female BEAUTY contest.

    Why are politics even involved?

    Because a sexually confused and frustrated individual will never stand next to her in contest, (or maybe thinks it somehow can with “equality“??). Hence the sexually confused and frustrated attacks her, that evil “normy“, in the most grandiose manor possible for getting the most attention. “Give me the answer I want or I will damage you.”

    In the end, all Perez Hilton did was indeed damage her, but utterly failed in it’s real agenda. Why? Because the very thought makes normal people want to puke and it always will.

    There are limits to equality. Some are established by nature.
  • roro80
    F_T, did you even read the post? Nobody's debating any longer whether she should or should not have won. These things have always been decided on ideology (if you were to bother to read my first comment on this thread) as well as beauty. Otherwise, they wouldn't bother to do a question/answer, would they? She gave a crappy answer that also happens to be on a hot-button issue, and she lost. She also agreed before the contest that the judges would get the final say, and there were no appeals to the decision. Then she skirted her responsibilities as the California winner in order to uphold her ideology and make bank in the process, so she lost her Cali crown. Just because you like leggy blondes who share your same prejudices doesn't change any of that. Get over it.

    And this: "What, this beautiful homosapien female stops being beautiful because of political opinion?" is pretty hilarious considering you assessed that I must be "physically repulsive" just a few weeks ago (despite having no idea what I look like) because of my political opinions.
  • Zzzzz
    I second that emotion.
  • casualobserver
    @@ I must be "physically repulsive" @@

    Please email a recent photo to TSteele to upload here and I will be happy to arbitrate the dispute pro bono.
  • roro80
    In your dreams, buddy.
  • DLS
    She wouldn't be in the news at all, except that news is being created from hatred of her by lefties.

    Leftist pathology, systematized.
  • DLS
    "criticize a person for intolerant views towards other's lifestyle choices while simultaneously exuding profuse intolerance for that person's lifestyle choices"

    The lefties have been the true reactionaries for a generation and longer now.
  • roro80
    Dang it, I meant to hit "reply" instead of "like". Freebee point for you.

    Anyway, this young woman is in the news because the right got pissed off that she didn't win. She gave a crap answer, and lost the pageant. Then she was in the news because the right picked her as spokesperson for her views, and she subsequently skipped out on her duties and therefore lost her crown. This has nothing to do with "hatred by the lefties".
  • Father_Time
    Uh....NO... actually I don't think about you at all. Especially your old posts.

    BTW her answer was perfect, unlike your mental stability.

    The sexually disturbed should never judge beauty contests for the normal. In fact the less interaction the better.
  • DLS
    "this young woman is in the news because the right got pissed off that she didn't win. [...] This has nothing to do with 'hatred by the lefties'."

    The truth is 100% opposite. She is in the news because of hatred by the lefties, who made her news once she firmly expressed opposition to gay marriage (which is mainstream, and shared even by Obama, for example).
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC