An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Taser Warns Police Not To Aim Devices At Suspects’ Chests

The makers of Taser have now issued a warning to police: don’t aim the stun guns at suspects’ chests or it could be hazardous to their health (like, fatal)…

The maker of Taser stun guns is advising police officers to avoid shooting suspects in the chest with the 50,000-volt weapon, saying that it could pose an extremely low risk of an “adverse cardiac event.”

The advisory, issued in an Oct. 12 training bulletin, is the first time that Taser International has suggested there is any risk of a cardiac arrest related to the discharge of its stun gun.

But Taser officials said Tuesday that the bulletin does not state that Tasers can cause cardiac arrest. They said the advisory means only that law-enforcement agencies can avoid controversy over the subject if their officers aim at areas other than the chest.

The recommendation could raise questions about whether police officers will find it more difficult to accurately direct the probes emitted by a Taser gun at a recommended body area in order to subdue a suspect. Taser officials say the change won’t hinder officers’ ability to use Tasers.

In a memo accompanying the bulletin, Taser officials point out that officers can still shoot the guns at a suspect’s chest, if needed.

Police departments across the United States and in Canada and Australia reacted immediately to the bulletin, with some ordering officers to follow Taser’s instructions and begin aiming at the abdomen, legs or back of a suspect.

And, indeed, the use of stun guns and the dangers posed by the have sparked a huge controversy in Australia.

  • Why not just put a label on the front of police uniforms that says, "Fluke accidents can occur if you make me need to restrain you. Don't be an idiot."?
  • EEllis
    Darwinism?
  • DLS
    There's no need for overreaction to this, obviously, even if sometimes the results are "like [sic], fatal."

    Yes, there have been protests, but the real-world issue here is no different than shooting with a gun (firearm). Why was the device used? What was the suspect doing at the time? First things first.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC