
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reform to Ruin Our Eyes and Make Us Crazy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/50301/reform-to-ruin-our-eyes-and-make-us-crazy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/50301/reform-to-ruin-our-eyes-and-make-us-crazy/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 23:31:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/50301/reform-to-ruin-our-eyes-and-make-us-crazy/comment-page-1/#comment-224048</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=50301#comment-224048</guid>
		<description>&quot;a government-run health-insurance plan, once on life support in the Senate, is making a recovery among Democrats writing health-care legislation&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I told you that the public option isn&#039;t dead yet.  It&#039;s not dead until it&#039;s (lib-Dem-level spelling) D-E-D, dead.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There&#039;s even the start of a recovery of posture support prior to House-Senate negotiations, with at least one Senator (Burris, D-Chicago, no surprise) taking the lib Dem farther-left line in the Senate while at least one person in the House is rumbling about offering a Medicare buy-in, as an amendment to a bill in the House (if anything, makes the public option look less radical by superficial comparison).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;* * *&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;the best-selling author in the White House&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;??? !!!  Is that how a President should be evaluated, on celebrity appeal?  What about a teevee show?  (How about CNN, with teevee shows titled the same as books by the celebs on those shows?)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Arrgh.  Liberal Democratic least-common-multiple low-tail-of-IQ-bell-curve-style &quot;populism&quot; [gag] ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;a government-run health-insurance plan, once on life support in the Senate, is making a recovery among Democrats writing health-care legislation&#8221;</p>
<p>I told you that the public option isn&#39;t dead yet.  It&#39;s not dead until it&#39;s (lib-Dem-level spelling) D-E-D, dead.</p>
<p>There&#39;s even the start of a recovery of posture support prior to House-Senate negotiations, with at least one Senator (Burris, D-Chicago, no surprise) taking the lib Dem farther-left line in the Senate while at least one person in the House is rumbling about offering a Medicare buy-in, as an amendment to a bill in the House (if anything, makes the public option look less radical by superficial comparison).</p>
<p>* * *</p>
<p>&#8220;the best-selling author in the White House&#8221;</p>
<p>??? !!!  Is that how a President should be evaluated, on celebrity appeal?  What about a teevee show?  (How about CNN, with teevee shows titled the same as books by the celebs on those shows?)</p>
<p>Arrgh.  Liberal Democratic least-common-multiple low-tail-of-IQ-bell-curve-style &#8220;populism&#8221; [gag] &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

