An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

(Guest Voice) Texas Mysteries: Did ‘Perry’s Office’ Pressure Commission Chair To Drop Innocence Investigation?

Taylor_Trail_Texas.jpg

Hello there, Dr. Estés here. UPDATE to the story continuing to unfold in Texas between Governor Perry and a Commission looking into facts, or lack of… surrounding a man condemned to death in Texas. A mystery within a mystery as some facts/motives surfaced by usual means, but some recently appeared from ‘invisible hands.’ To give clarity? Or to purposely muddy the waters? Correspondent here is our TMV GUEST VOICE, Mr. Elijah Sweete.

Update: Did Perry’s Office Pressure Commission
Chair To Drop Innocence Investigation?
By Elijah Sweete

The Chicago Tribune and Ft. Worth Star-Telegram both report that just months prior to his dismissal, along with three other members of the nine member Texas Forensic Science Commission, former Commission Chair, Samuel Bassett, felt he was being pressured to drop the investigation into the possible innocence of Cameron Todd Willingham. Willingham was executed in 2004 in Texas.

http://www.star-telegram.com/804/story/1678389.html

http://www.star-telegram.com/804/story/1680691.html

Bassett said he was twice called to meetings with top attorneys from the Governor’s office. He was told that they were displeased with the course of the investigation. Quoted in the Chicago Tribune, Bassett said, “I was surprised that they were involving themselves in the commission’s decision-making.” He added, “I did feel some pressure from them, yes. There’s no question about that.” After the meetings, staff from general counsel’s office began attending the commission’s meetings.

Bassett told the Star-Telegram that the Governor’s General Counsel questioned whether the innocence investigation was something the commission should be doing. Bassett, interviewed by the Star-Telegram said that there were “some fairly intense questions about why the commission was conducting these investigations,” but that they “never explicitly said you’ve got to stop this investigation.”

A spokesperson for the Governor’s office responded “the governor’s office and the governor do not micromanage the work of the boards and commissions.” The governor’s office later admitted that the meetings took place and that Bassett was “asked” why the commission was reviewing the Willingham case.

Chairman Bassett determined that the commission’s investigation was appropriate, and proceeded with it. Within months Gov. Perry dismissed and replaced him in spite of letters from other commission members recommending that he be kept in place. http://www.star-telegram.com/448/story/1668527.html. In an AP interview, a prosecutor who served on the commission and who wrote one of the letters to Gov. Perry said of Bassett, “Sam is not an ideologue. He’s a straightforward guy, a straight shooter…He didn’t let any political agendas get in the way.”

OTHER DEVELOPMENTS:

• A mysterious confession affidavit has surfaced. The affidavit appears suspect. It is a multiple hearsay account, someone told someone who told someone who signed an affidavit. The players in the multiple hearsay include Willingham’s ex-wife and one of her relatives. It is inconsistent with proper jail procedure, allegedly coming from a jail visit. Except for attorneys, jailhouse visits are routinely monitored or recorded, particularly in a situation involving a capital murder. No tape recording or law enforcement report confirming the contents of the affidavit have been released.

• Perry’s displeasure with the commission’s work may not have been limited to the Willingham case. The commission had retained an expert to review the work of a Texas state serologist in a different suspected wrongful conviction case. It had discussed possibly making surprise inspections of state labs to assure quality control protocols were being followed and was set to begin a series of round tables about whether forensic methods in Texas were science based.

• Perry’s office has refused to release information on its execution review though the Governor received a report questioning the science of the arson investigation just prior to Willingham’s execution. The report sent to Perry was prepared by an Austin arson expert, Gerald Hurst, who has a doctorate in chemistry from Cambridge University. Perry’s office says the execution review materials are not public records, though the Governor’s office, in the past, released such materials as public records under George W. Bush

• Interviewed on WBAP radio, Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchinson (R-TX) called Perry’s actions in replacing four commissioners just as the commission was about to review evidence in the Willingham case covering up. “I just think the governor made a mistake in trying to ramrod a covering-up of what might be more evidence for the future.”

• Debra Medina (R-TX), also challenging Perry for the Republican nomination, rebuked Perry in unequivocal terms. “If the governor cared about justice, he’d work hard to ensure that the panel’s work is completed in all due haste, that all the evidence is considered.” And, later, “This constant changing of the guard when he doesn’t like the findings is more evidence that the governor behaves more and more like a tyrant, ‘off with their heads’ when people don’t agree with him.”

___________
CODA
A Lost Story about Seeing, from Dr.E.
The photo above is of an ancient river bed along the Paluxy River in Glen Rose Texas. This area is in the middle of a State Park, famous for dinosaur tracks. Some Texans note that what doesn’t show up in the tourist brochures as much as the dinosaur tracks, is that ancient human tracks were also discovered here (as you see above). The human tracks leading in different directions, are in the same geologic formation layers as the dino tracks, and also on the same bedding plane, and in some cases overlapping the dinosaur tracks…

giving reason to measure far more carefully the ways dinosaurs and humans shared the same small milieu, influencing each others’ environs in ways that were not ‘on the surface’ but in underbrush and under the river for eons…

The early explorers, archeologists, anthropologists without aerial or depth sensor equipment for penetrating views, didnt know and often couldnt even imagine ‘what lay beneath,’ until they traveled there first person and went into the brush to see the evidences and their relationship to other evidences, precisely.

  • D. E.Rodriguez
    Thank you, dr. e., for continuing to update us on this story.

    Dorian
  • tidbits
    This story just gets stranger and stranger. The comments from fellow R's are pretty rough. And, why not release the execution review materials? Between that and what he did to the commission, it raises a lot of questions.
  • EEllis
    What is the Texas Forensic Science Commission doing investigating anyone's "innocence"? Investigating the science of the arson report maybe, but that is not in any fashion investigating "innocence". That is not their job and outside their mission. Maybe they needed to be shut down if they were that off track.

    The Texas Forensic Science Commission was created
    by the Texas Legislature in 2005 for the purpose of:


    A. Developing & implementing a reporting system through which accredited laboratories, facilities, or entities report professional negligence or misconduct


    B. Requiring all laboratories, facilities, or entities that conduct forensic analyses to report professional negligence or misconduct to the commission

    C. Investigating, in a timely manner, any allegation of professional negligence or misconduct that would substantially affect the integrity of the results of a forensic analysis conducted by an accredited laboratory, facility or entity.


    Maybe they felt they were doing C but then they should only be focused on the science and why a case where the guy was already executed? I can see why the gov thought they were going off point. This is a new agency and it is reasonable to disagree but why would this Commission be used like this? It's and end run.
  • tidbits
    The statute cited by EEllis, both paragraphs B and C, more than justify what the commission was doing. The Willingham investigation was about the science of the arson report that led to Willingham's conviction. Calling it an innocence investigation may be misstating what they were doing, but if the evidence (science) turned up bad, an innocence investigation is what it would amount to, or at least it would put a lot of doubt in the case.

    Still doesn't answer the question of the governor interfering with the commission or refusing to release the execution review documents or pressuring the commision chair to drop the investigation. If it walks like a cover-up, and quacks like a cover-up, there's a pretty good chance it's a cover-up. Even conservative R's like Hutchinson are using the term cover-up to describe Perry's conduct.

    At this point it's as much about Perry's conduct as it is Willingham's guilt or innocence. People want fair, honest and transparent government, and it doesn't look like they're getting that in Texas.
  • EEllis
    "The statute cited by Ellis, both paragraphs B and C, more than justify what the commission was doing"

    Not the way I read it and definitely not how it is being portrayed (as a innocence investigation). At best
    (referring to to the arson conclusion in the Willingham case) it would of said that the report should have stated that it was unable to determine the cause of the fire. This is not a judicial or criminal commity so the idea that that finding would prove Willinghams innocence is absurd and factually untrue.


    If the commision starts going off half cocked getting involved in things the Gov doesn't believe they should be doing then he should tell them and take action. If they had over reached and were investigating things that were not their business then maybe not releasing Docs that legally mean nothing and have no legal finding makes sense.

    If they wanted to investigate the arson investigator then that would have made sense. But that isn't what happened is it. Why not? Why take on this much more expansive case that is clearly arguably outside their purview?







  • tidbits
    You're welcome to your opinion EEllis. I disagree...and so does very-pro-death-penalty Kay Bailey Hutchinson. What Perry is doing is a cover-up, and you don't cover something up unless you think you have something to hide.
  • EEllis
    "I disagree...and so does very-pro-death-penalty Kay Bailey Hutchinson"

    That's campaign politics. I have no doubt that Kay would have been just as unhappy with the far ranging nature of the commission. As for cover up, why bother? No One Will Care. nobodies mind will be changed, nothing will be proved. Willingham was such a scumbag that even innocent no one would mind that he is dead. I think the commission was wasting time and state money and it mattered only to the anti death penalty people, almost all of whom are out of state. It has to matter to merit a cover up.
  • ordinarysparrow
    Thank you Mr. Elijah Sweete for keeping us posted on this ongoing situation and perhaps Gov. Perry will get tripped up in his own bindings. . .i am hoping this is getting full attention in the Texas media. . .all too often cover-ups become more bitter pills than the original truths. . .

    " The early explorers, archeologists, anthropologists without aerial or depth sensor equipment for penetrating views, didnt know and often couldnt even imagine ‘what lay beneath,’ until they traveled there first person and went into the brush to see the evidences and their relationship to other evidences, precisely.". . . .so very true dr.e. . . .

    may all darkness come to the point of light in this case. . . .
  • spirasol
    Well it seems like the smoke is getting thicker.............perhaps there is a fire. I guess things are proceeding as they should. I hope it does lead to some action, some consequence, personal or political and that there is some teaching, some moral to the story..........how it ends, hopefully not in atypical coverup.

    Even though accused as a "scumbag," which may, by accident and fate and opinion, be his only crime, I say it demeans us all to base justice on his station in life or on another's perception of the value of his life.
  • DLS
    "What is the Texas Forensic Science Commission doing investigating anyone's 'innocence'?"

    That's a good point. It caught my eye given that I've noticed something similar in Washington, DC, one of many things wrong there -- an example being the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, not the Department of Energy or Commerce, devising (ridiculous) motor vehicle fuel economy regulations.

    "NHTSA sets fuel economy standards for cars and light trucks sold in the U.S."

    http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/portal/fueleconomy.jsp
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC