Comments on: Is Obama’s Nobel Just to Repudiate George W. Bush?: Corriere della Sera, Italy

By: DLS

DLS — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:58:59 +0000

“Look for Merkel to get it next year for not being Adolf Hitler.”

Not good enough — Bush would then have earned the prize, as well as evil Ronald Reagan, despite what the confusing charges coming from many lefties.

I would say such an award in Germany would be reserved for nobody to the right of Joschka Fischer.

By: dduck12

dduck12 — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 20:38:01 +0000

Good one. Or Putin not quite being Stalin.

By: kritt11

kritt11 — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 20:17:02 +0000

Ok now ask yourself. Who does this reflect more poorly on— Obama for winning the award prematurely, or Bush for being such an international bogeyman that just having him leave office was seen as reason enough for giving the award to Obama.???

In some European countries Obama's approval rating is above 90% while Bush's was about 11%. In order to lead we need solid alliances overseas.- Which international scenario works out better for US prestige and overall security?

By: Leonidas

Leonidas — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 05:15:04 +0000

Yup, Obama was got elected as not being George Bush so he gets a peace prize, lol how low the standards for the award have sunken.

By: dduck12

dduck12 — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:42:27 +0000

Cartoon says it all.

By: Tweets that mention Is Obama’s Nobel Just to Repudiate George W. Bush?: Corriere della Sera, Italy | The Moderate Voice -- Topsy.com

Sat, 10 Oct 2009 20:43:49 +0000

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by TMV. TMV said: Is Obama’s Nobel Just to Repudiate George W. Bush?: Corriere della Sera, Italy: Americans aren’t alone i.. http://bit.ly/2MnSn4 [...]