An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Is Obama’s Nobel Just to Repudiate George W. Bush?: Corriere della Sera, Italy

Americans aren’t alone in thinking that President Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize was nothing more than a West-European rejection of the polices of President Bush. For Italy’s Corriere della Sera, columnist Franco Venturini gives vent to his fear that this Nobel may have ben erroneously awarded:

“If not an indictment of his predecessor, what is this Nobel for Barack Obama, which has no relation to hard and fast accomplishments and isn’t to celebrate his more than credit-worthy diversity? … If that’s the way things have gone, we believe Oslo was in error. Because the decision to award Obama reveals an ideological intent, while Obama himself sums up his new policies as being bereft of an ideological bent.

“The president, at first surprised himself, perhaps provided the best interpretation of all for his award: a simple incentive to go on, an encouragement, with the unspoken hope that the Nobel doesn’t raise the bar too much and contribute to his vulnerability on the domestic front. We, too, wish to believe that this is an encouragement, and would like to associate ourselves with it. But one cannot ignore that yesterday, a new era began: that of a Nobel Prize based on trust.”

By Franco Venturini

Translated By Enrico Del Sero

October 10, 2009

Italy – Corriere della Sera – Original Article (Italian)
Defeated a few days ago in Copenhagen where he had unsuccessfully carried Chicago’s bid to host the 2016 Olympics, in nearby Oslo, Barack Obama has exacted a surprising and singular revenge. Surprising because never in the post-war era has the Nobel Peace Prize been awarded to a sitting American president – to say nothing of one who has been in office for just nine months. Singular because Obama, a bearer of intentions that deserve all of our support, has yet to achieve any of them and could over the next few days, expose the paradox of a Nobel Peace Prize winner sending additional troops to fight a bloody war.

READ ON AT WORLDMEETS.US, your most trusted translator and aggregator of foreign news and views about our nation.

  • dduck12
    Cartoon says it all.
  • Leonidas
    Yup, Obama was got elected as not being George Bush so he gets a peace prize, lol how low the standards for the award have sunken. Look for Merkel to get it next year for not being Adolf Hitler.
  • kritt11
    Ok now ask yourself. Who does this reflect more poorly on--- Obama for winning the award prematurely, or Bush for being such an international bogeyman that just having him leave office was seen as reason enough for giving the award to Obama.???

    In some European countries Obama's approval rating is above 90% while Bush's was about 11%. In order to lead we need solid alliances overseas.- Which international scenario works out better for US prestige and overall security?
  • dduck12
    Good one. Or Putin not quite being Stalin.
  • DLS
    "Look for Merkel to get it next year for not being Adolf Hitler."

    Not good enough -- Bush would then have earned the prize, as well as evil Ronald Reagan, despite what the confusing charges coming from many lefties.

    I would say such an award in Germany would be reserved for nobody to the right of Joschka Fischer.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC