An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Ahmadinejad is the New Saddam: Arab Times, Kuwait

There seems to be an emerging trend in the Muslim world, in which all leaders regarded as despots are called ‘worse than Saddam’, ‘as bad as Saddam’, or the ‘new Saddam.’

Yesterday we posted ‘Muammar Qaddafi is No Better than Saddam,’ from the newspaper Sotal Iraq.

Today, from Kuwait’s Arab Times, we have this article that warns about Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad being the ‘new Saddam.’ Coming from Kuwait, a nation Saddam invaded in 1990, that’s pretty strong language.

For the Arab Times, Editor-in-Chief Ahmed Al-Jarallah writes in part:

Even as his country is engulfed in a monumental leadership crisis with a system pushing Iran backwards, Ahmadinejad continues to exude an air of false strength. The country’s spooks are busy spending money organizing terrorist attacks and operations of destruction that Iranians clearly condemned with their Quds Day [Jerusalem Day] slogan, “no Gaza, no Lebanon, we are dying for Iran!”

“It seems that in every generation, there’s a dictator who treads a different path from those of his peers. In 1967, Gamal Abdel Nasser employed a similar trick that was discovered later [reference to the Six-Day War against Israel]. In the 1970s, the murderer of Baghdad [Saddam] also crafted lies, claiming to be working toward liberating Quds [Jerusalem], while what he actually planned was to destroy half the Israeli population using chemical weapons. His passion for killing eventually led him to kill tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis in mass graves. That dark day in August 1990 was the final straw. When he attacked Kuwait, the true nature of this killer was exposed. When he fell with his collaborators and as Iraq and the entire region were liberated from his clutches, Saddam’s summer night’s dreams vanished into thin air.

“By deceiving citizens about his real intentions, Ahmadinejad is walking the same path as Saddam Hussein and Nasser. … After the fall of Saddam, the entire region was relieved that such a killer was gone. But he has been reincarnated in the form of Ahmadinejad, who takes after him completely by bringing calamity to his people.”

By Ahmed Al-Jarallah*

September 29, 2009

Kuwait – Arab Times – Original Article (English)

WHAT does the Ayatollah want from the world? Where is he taking Iranians and the rest if the region’s citizens by courting the enmity of the international community? One wonders what the rest of the nations can do to please Iran and discourage its leaders from escalating tensions. This is a pertinent question, particularly after Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad reiterated his threat at the podium of the United Nations.

READ ON AT WORLDMEETS.US, your most trusted translator and aggregator of foreign news and views about our nation.

  • kathykattenburg
    As your graphic suggests, those who have no imagination or ability to assess each threat on its own merits, are always going to need a template, and apparently the "Everyone we don't like is another Hitler" is starting to get old.
  • Father_Time
    Kuwait is a Sunni Kingdom, and, our friend. It may be that the powers that be in Kuwait are getting nervous. Millions of Shia Muslims right across the border in Iraq are greatly influenced if not controlled from Tehran. They might indeed be envisioning another invasion, this time by the Iranians. If so, I think it not a stretch for the Kuwaitis to worry that the United States may not go to war against Iran in order to liberate Kuwait again. Especially if Iran is nuclear armed.
  • shannonlee
    That is exactly what I was thinking.
  • JeffersonDavis
    The reporter for the Arab Times reiterates what we moderates and conservatives have been saying all along. It is more than likely that Ahmadenijad cannot be bargained with. It was true with every "generation's despot" that said one thing while planning another (Hitler, Stalin, Nasser, Hussein, etc). Can diplomacy prevail with Iran. I doubt it. I truly hope it can, but I doubt it. The President wagered our butts on diplomacy's success. I'll be praying that President Obama is right on this one.
  • Enjoyed the post and I agree with Kathy's comment. Every one of the dictators we oppose (probably about 2% of the brutal dictators on the planet. We ignore the others) is another Hitler. And sure as there are scared children, some of our population can be whipped into a frenzy of fear and launched into futile, costly and pointless war. I guess we're all doomed because we were unable to "negotiate" or use "diplomacy" with nuclear North Korea, Russia, China and Pakistan. Too bad they've taken over the world, eliminated Israel and India and of course South Korea, Taiwan and Vietnam. It's really too bad these nuclear tyrants can't be reasoned with and as sure as Israel is a pile of cinders now, we are all doomed.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC