An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

What Gen. Stanley McChrystal Wants

As much as I detest the phrase “defining moment” — a journalistic cliche that has is a pleasant as hearing blackboard chalk scrape — President Barack Obama now faces a….defining moment, in his presidency. Will he give Gen. Stanley McChrystal the 40,000 troops he says he needs to successfully fight the battle in Afghanistan?

In blogs, talk radio, TV and cable everyone is talking about what the General says he wants and putting their own spins on it.

Here is the text of a speech he gave in London
– so you can read his line of thought for yourself and draw your own conclusions.

So what WILL Obama do? (Leave your predictions in comments if you want..)

  • Leonidas
    Smart move would be to send about 1/2 that number fairly quickly, look at the reports that come in after doing so for a couple months then determine if sending the rest seems prudent or not.
  • Obama also has to consider that no manager in any company anywhere in the world says "I don't need or want any more on my staff." Marketing may say they can conquer the world with a couple dozen more on staff, while it may actually be sales or customer service that could really make the difference.

    Leonidas' idea is probably a good start, but I hope Obama is looking beyond military solutions. There's an excellent article in Esquire about combat in NE Afghanistan. In the journalistic account, it took days and nights of strenuous hiking, with air support, to get into a remote valley that may or may not yield a half dozen of the enemy. Several of our troops had to be airlifted out because they couldn't go on, became dehydrated or got injured. That just doesn't seem like a winnable scenario. All opposing troops have to do is lay low and wait. After all, they live there. They don't have to fight well-armed American troops, just wait til they leave.
  • Father_Time
    I read the whole thing Mr.Gandelman, Interesting that numbers of troops were NOT mentioned.

    After reading this, I am even further convinced that we need to pull out. What the general asks cannot be done without massive assistance from the world. Our country alone, even with the paltry help we are getting from our allied coalition cannot possibly succeed and I think that is exactly what is written between the lines of his speech. All this talk of “patience” and “understanding” don’t mean squat to me. The threat of terrorist attacks increasing was not mentioned, only that Al Queida will return if we leave. Al Queida, a miniscule number of people less than the size of a battalion is dictating our policy that we cannot afford to pay for any longer.

    The whole idea of escalating Afghanistan virtually alone is preposterous. Ether the world wants to do something about this terrorism problem, or they don’t. Our people cannot subsidize the civilization of endemically divided backward tribes. You cannot bring millions of people 2000 years into the modern world successfully on any time frame I am willing to accept. Especially on a time frame without even the basic definition of how much time he is talking about.

    The resources of the United States is NOT infinite. Nor is our patience.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC