An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Your Ten Year Old and the Future U.S. Air Force

new_predator

One of the stories behind the story of the demise of the F-22 Raptor fighter is the “developing story” of the increasingly important role unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are playing in today’s and certainly in tomorrow’s Air Force.

In my story behind the story of the F-22 demise, I quoted Fred Kaplan’s comments that, during the most intense period of the Cold War, “much higher status was given to pilots of nuclear bombers.” Then, the Vietnam War “paved the way for the rise of the fighter pilot.” However, the Iraq and Afghanistan wars are now demanding a new Air Force culture—part of this new culture are the UAV “pilots.”

Also, about how those who “fly” the UAVs will no longer have to be pilots, and about the prediction by C. R. Anderegg, the Air Force historian, that “just as the generals of the 1950s and ’60s were predominantly bomber pilots, and the generals of the 1970s and ’80s were mainly fighter pilots, so a lot of the generals in the coming decades may be UAV joystick pilots,”

Anderegg: “It’s going to be pretty hard for a promotion board, picking the next one-star generals, to pick a colonel who hasn’t commanded a UAV wing over a colonel who has. The UAV commander has the experience, and he has a larger, less insular view of the battlefield than, say, an F-22 pilot at Langley.”

One of our readers of my F-22 story commented:

UAVs. I KNEW the military would be customized to fit the Nintendo Generation somehow!

LOL

My eight-year old could be a Colonel in the Air Force by the time he’s ten.

Well, while 10 is perhaps a relatively young age to achieve such a high rank in today’s Air Force, chances are that many of today’s “Nintendo generation” may in fact be the colonels in tomorrow’s Air Force.

An article in yesterday’s Christian Science Monitor tells us that last week the Air Force graduated its first class of pilots without flight training.

The class consisted of just eight officers trained to fly and control the MQ-1 Predator UAV.

According to the Monitor, Lt. Gen. David Deptula, deputy chief of staff for Air Force Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance, calls the graduation a “transition point” for the Air Force in terms of the way it trains the kind of pilots that are needed today. “It’s a departure from how we’ve selected and trained pilots for remotely-controlled planes before,” he says.

Unlike most of the service’s other UAV pilots who have undergone 12- to 18-month pilot training for their various aircraft, the eight officers have never flown Air Force planes. And they may never do so. The new training program is four to six months and includes basic flight screening and equipment training.

This training underscores Secretary Gates’ determination to institutionalize the doctrine and capabilities to fight irregular warfare across the Defense Department.

Finally, according to the Monitor, “The Air Force has a short-term goal of flying 50 remote-controlled planes over Iraq or Afghanistan at any one time by 2010. Currently, the service flies about 36 remote-controlled airplanes over the two war theaters.”

In my previous post, I mentioned that the White House’s defense-budget request for fiscal 2010 includes approximately $3.5 billion for unmanned aerial vehicles.

So, parents, grandparents, next time you see your 10-year-old child or grandchild engaged in a ferocious dogfight across the skies of some far-off country, keep in mind that you may be looking at the next Air Force UAV pilot.

Image: Courtesy General Atomics Aeronautical

  • JeffersonDavis
    As I said on that previous story....
    They finally tailor-fit the Air Force for the "Nintendo Generation".

    Oddly enough... My ten year old wants to be a Marine instead of a pilot.
    Oh well. That's the Air Force's loss.
  • D. E.Rodriguez
    I am sure he will make a great Marine, JD.

    Dorian
  • JeffersonDavis
    Thanks D.E.
    His mother hates the idea (of course). It's all he talks about.
    If he choses the Marines. I'll guide him toward the Naval Acadamy. Might as well get more pay AND a top-notch education. Right?

    God Bless.
  • Rambie
    I live within a few miles of a Air Force Base, near a ATK Rocket plant to watch test firings, and always being generally interested in aerospace, I have kept tabs on air/space craft development.

    This shouldn't have come as a surprise to anyone who was paying attention. During the F22's development in the 90's they were talking about how this could be the last generation of manned fighter craft. The airframes of modern fighters can stand much more stress then the pilots human body.
  • D. E.Rodriguez
    I have known a couple of naval aviators.

    They are some of the most proud people on the planet.

    Good choice
  • I'm reminded of a funny cartoon from years ago. A teen is reading the classified ads (of his dreams) and says, "Hey. Look at this. Wanted, computer savvy applicants with strong thumbs and good hand-eye coordination for glamorous, high paying job."
  • Father_Time
    Not far behind is the computer programming that will eliminate pilots altogether. Then who will be the Air Force generals? Mess officers? Maybe just some civilian GS-4 behind a desk with a laptop?
  • JeffersonDavis
    Generals: Bill Gates and Steve Jobs, of course.

    LOL
  • Father_Time
    Dorian

    Do you know if there is any truth that the AF tried to cut funding for the UCAV?
  • D. E.Rodriguez
    I'll look into it, FT.



    There is an interesting article on the ND (nuclear dedicated) UCAV in a June issue of the Armed Forces Journal, http://www.armedforcesjournal.com/2009/06/4040349 that touches upon it and concludes as follows:

    There can be little doubt that the development of the ND-UCAV deserves further attention. As UAS technology continues to mature, there will be fewer and fewer technical obstacles that stand in the way of expanding the role of the UAS in warfare. If the Air Force embraces change that by many accounts is inevitable, a renaissance of aviation may be in store. If, however, it does not, Congress, a constrained fiscal environment and the demands of the American people may once again place the Air Force in a difficult position. Military aviators have a long tradition of heroism that is noteworthy. And, it should not be forgotten that while the ND-UCAV will remove the aviator from the cockpit, it does not remove the airman from the fight. Any UAS is only as capable as its designers. Like manned bombers, its limits are man-made. Keeping its strengths and weaknesses in perspective may give the ND-UCAV the fighting chance it deserves.
  • D. E.Rodriguez
    Still haven't found anything recent.

    The USAF UCAV debate (and R&D) has been going on for several years now. Something related may have occurred then??
  • Father_Time
    To my knowledge, not beyond what is already media accessible. I'm wondering if UAV budget allotments include UCAV technology. I think the Navy likes the UCAV, but it seems the Air Force does not.
  • Father_Time
    Thank You Dorian. There is a related article in the May 11 issue of Aviation Week and Space Technology mentioning "waffling support from the Air force". (Ray of Hope, by Amy Butler).

    Correction on my last post. Divergent mission requirements nixed the J-UCAS idea.
  • D. E.Rodriguez
    Thanks. I'll take a look at the AW&ST aricle in a little while, after I finish working on my next "blockbuster" :)

    D.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC