Comments on: Obama’s JFK Test

By: JeffersonDavis

JeffersonDavis — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:35:14 +0000

Anyone believing that the Iranian second nuclear facility was a surprise is naive at best.
In fact, there are probably more than two.
And to imply that the Russians were shocked is naive as well. They knew and most likely helped them along under the table.

This is how superpowers play.

By: DLS

DLS — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 19:06:02 +0000

"already proof months, years before"

Absolutely. This was no huge surprise, much less shock, to anyone with a working brain.

The intriguing things (on the safe assumption Obama isn't going to be rash) are: Was this a leak meant to forestall military action, and what did the recent missile defense decision (which involved not only the removal of the Czech-Polish enterprise but the decision to employ theater missile defenses and sea-based defenses, which scream "Persian Gulf and protecting Iran's neighbors and their oil installations") have to do with this, if anything?

By: joeaudio

joeaudio — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 18:37:13 +0000

'fake liberal “crisis”'
ha ha ha.Everybody know liberals suck at crisis.
If Cheney was still in charge, we'd be in ultra-super-red-alert fear mongering mode by now.
Obama is such a wimp, just like JFK.
Kennedy should have started WWIII just to show those damn Russkys what a macho man he was.

By: LionAslan

LionAslan — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 18:36:08 +0000

there seemed already proof months, years before this week's 'revelation.'

By: DLS

DLS — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 18:23:47 +0000

This is not another Cuban missile crisis or any fake liberal “crisis” (it was no shock to anybody with a working brain, in fact). No, this is not Obama's big test, and he is not another JFK, or God, et cetera.