<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prospects for Public Option Are Looking Better and Better</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/47443/prospects-for-public-option-are-looking-better-and-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47443/prospects-for-public-option-are-looking-better-and-better/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 21:11:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47443/prospects-for-public-option-are-looking-better-and-better/comment-page-1/#comment-217489</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=47443#comment-217489</guid>
		<description>Kathy, the logical question for you to ask, if any, is what Pelosi has been drinking (or smoking).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And no, you get no credit for what is a superficial posture response, &quot;courage.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathy, the logical question for you to ask, if any, is what Pelosi has been drinking (or smoking).</p>
<p>And no, you get no credit for what is a superficial posture response, &#8220;courage.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47443/prospects-for-public-option-are-looking-better-and-better/comment-page-1/#comment-217487</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=47443#comment-217487</guid>
		<description>The logical question to ask is what Pelosi has been drinking or smoking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The logical question to ask is what Pelosi has been drinking or smoking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kathykattenburg</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47443/prospects-for-public-option-are-looking-better-and-better/comment-page-1/#comment-217450</link>
		<dc:creator>kathykattenburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=47443#comment-217450</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Kathy, the &quot;other side&quot; is the Senate. For legislation to make it to Obama&#039;s desk, House and Senate must agree. (Obama has made his preferences known, but he is not a legislator.)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Really.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ll bet you don&#039;t like your martinis dry, either, DLS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Kathy, the &#8220;other side&#8221; is the Senate. For legislation to make it to Obama&#39;s desk, House and Senate must agree. (Obama has made his preferences known, but he is not a legislator.)</i></p>
<p>Really.</p>
<p>I&#39;ll bet you don&#39;t like your martinis dry, either, DLS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47443/prospects-for-public-option-are-looking-better-and-better/comment-page-1/#comment-217445</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=47443#comment-217445</guid>
		<description>Kathy, the &quot;other side&quot; is the Senate.  For legislation to make it to Obama&#039;s desk, House and Senate must agree.  (Obama has made his preferences known, but he is not a legislator.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Note that the failure of the Baucus bill (more than what was anticipated) means the final legislation is likely to be somewhat to the left of it (in the direction of the House legislation).  That doesn&#039;t mean that extremists like Pelosi (making wildly unrealistic statements, suitable for GOP campaign ads next year) can expect to get all they want.  It&#039;s merely a shift more in the House legislation&#039;s direction and a trade-off against more rejection by Blue Dogs and the GOP in the Senate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is no reason at this time to expect the Dems to continue to be so bad they can&#039;t get anything done, or produce legislation so bad that Obama vetoes it (and it is not overridden, all of which could be set up as a stage-managed script for manipulation of public opinion in the case of failure).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathy, the &#8220;other side&#8221; is the Senate.  For legislation to make it to Obama&#39;s desk, House and Senate must agree.  (Obama has made his preferences known, but he is not a legislator.)</p>
<p>Note that the failure of the Baucus bill (more than what was anticipated) means the final legislation is likely to be somewhat to the left of it (in the direction of the House legislation).  That doesn&#39;t mean that extremists like Pelosi (making wildly unrealistic statements, suitable for GOP campaign ads next year) can expect to get all they want.  It&#39;s merely a shift more in the House legislation&#39;s direction and a trade-off against more rejection by Blue Dogs and the GOP in the Senate.</p>
<p>There is no reason at this time to expect the Dems to continue to be so bad they can&#39;t get anything done, or produce legislation so bad that Obama vetoes it (and it is not overridden, all of which could be set up as a stage-managed script for manipulation of public opinion in the case of failure).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kathykattenburg</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47443/prospects-for-public-option-are-looking-better-and-better/comment-page-1/#comment-217436</link>
		<dc:creator>kathykattenburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=47443#comment-217436</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The House is only one side of this.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What&#039;s the other side? :-&#124;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The House is only one side of this.</i></p>
<p>It is?</p>
<p>What&#39;s the other side? <img src='http://themoderatevoice.com/wordpress-engine/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_neutral.gif' alt=':-|' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rambie</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47443/prospects-for-public-option-are-looking-better-and-better/comment-page-1/#comment-217380</link>
		<dc:creator>Rambie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=47443#comment-217380</guid>
		<description>The House is only one side of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The House is only one side of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47443/prospects-for-public-option-are-looking-better-and-better/comment-page-1/#comment-217368</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=47443#comment-217368</guid>
		<description>&quot;Trying to control costs through health insurance is like trying to control gas prices at gas stations.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s a handy demon, though.  &quot;Bu$ine$$&quot; and &quot;Profit$&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Changing intermediaries, from insurers to the federal government, and exchanging one set of problems for another has always been the obvious consequence of a federal takeover.  One of the problems will be cost containment (in the 1990s, the hope was &quot;managed competition under a cap,&quot; for example).  Medicaid represents the best-known set of problems providers and patients will face (though it will be more complicated when everyone&#039;s controlled by Washington and there&#039;s no distinction any more between government beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries, and no more ability to shift costs to recover what government doesn&#039;t pay).  We will additionally see curtailment and denial of treatment eventually, be it due to &quot;appropriateness&quot; standards or openly for cost control.  (The idiotic leftist tantrums about concern about &quot;death panels&quot; and such only shows the ignorance or depth of dishonesty of those people; we have had the equivalent of &quot;death panels&quot; since the 1960s, at least, and contemporary liberalism includes an unhealthily strong support of euthenasia, so it is natural that normal people are suspicious of medicine being taken over by similar people with elitist as well as political leftist backgrounds.  Illogical anger and scummy slander directed at everyone else does the angry lefties no credit here -- apologies, the intent to actually learn more about the subject, and healthy wariness about too-ambitious as well as naive statements by takeover advocates are overdue.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Trying to control costs through health insurance is like trying to control gas prices at gas stations.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#39;s a handy demon, though.  &#8220;Bu$ine$$&#8221; and &#8220;Profit$&#8221;</p>
<p>Changing intermediaries, from insurers to the federal government, and exchanging one set of problems for another has always been the obvious consequence of a federal takeover.  One of the problems will be cost containment (in the 1990s, the hope was &#8220;managed competition under a cap,&#8221; for example).  Medicaid represents the best-known set of problems providers and patients will face (though it will be more complicated when everyone&#39;s controlled by Washington and there&#39;s no distinction any more between government beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries, and no more ability to shift costs to recover what government doesn&#39;t pay).  We will additionally see curtailment and denial of treatment eventually, be it due to &#8220;appropriateness&#8221; standards or openly for cost control.  (The idiotic leftist tantrums about concern about &#8220;death panels&#8221; and such only shows the ignorance or depth of dishonesty of those people; we have had the equivalent of &#8220;death panels&#8221; since the 1960s, at least, and contemporary liberalism includes an unhealthily strong support of euthenasia, so it is natural that normal people are suspicious of medicine being taken over by similar people with elitist as well as political leftist backgrounds.  Illogical anger and scummy slander directed at everyone else does the angry lefties no credit here &#8212; apologies, the intent to actually learn more about the subject, and healthy wariness about too-ambitious as well as naive statements by takeover advocates are overdue.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47443/prospects-for-public-option-are-looking-better-and-better/comment-page-1/#comment-217367</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=47443#comment-217367</guid>
		<description>&quot;half the country still doesn&#039;t know what the hell you are talking about&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That&#039;s because the Dems themselves increasingly don&#039;t know.  That&#039;s even crediting more of them than actually merit credit, and assuming they actually have read the legislation &quot;they have worked&quot; on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;half the country still doesn&#39;t know what the hell you are talking about&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#39;s because the Dems themselves increasingly don&#39;t know.  That&#39;s even crediting more of them than actually merit credit, and assuming they actually have read the legislation &#8220;they have worked&#8221; on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47443/prospects-for-public-option-are-looking-better-and-better/comment-page-1/#comment-217366</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=47443#comment-217366</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s no surprise some would overreact or wrongly react in other ways.  [sigh]  The Baucus bill was a dud, and got grief from Senate Dems on the Left, so as I wrote long ago, the likely House and Senate conference will result in Dem legislation farther left than Baucus, which means the public option is far from dead at this time, not to mention the alternative (too intellectually challenging for some?) before them, to make the co-ops into the public option in every way (including rigged &quot;competition&quot; -- as if we all are expected to be so stupid as to believe the &quot;keeps insurance companies honest&quot; nonsense) except nominally.  (Extra assistance: That means it can be the public option, but called &quot;co-ops&quot; or something else instead, to do better politically.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The challenges remain not to lose public and more-sensible Dem and GOP support for whatever is worked out, as well as rein in the most loony of the lib Dems, especially in the House.  So far, the record is of failure, and though they&#039;re currently dysfunctional to the point where they still are not coherent, the Dems might calm down, grow up, set priorities, and actually get legislation done.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And of course, if they continue to fail, they can continue to blame Sarah Palin, etc, at their continued loss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s no surprise some would overreact or wrongly react in other ways.  [sigh]  The Baucus bill was a dud, and got grief from Senate Dems on the Left, so as I wrote long ago, the likely House and Senate conference will result in Dem legislation farther left than Baucus, which means the public option is far from dead at this time, not to mention the alternative (too intellectually challenging for some?) before them, to make the co-ops into the public option in every way (including rigged &#8220;competition&#8221; &#8212; as if we all are expected to be so stupid as to believe the &#8220;keeps insurance companies honest&#8221; nonsense) except nominally.  (Extra assistance: That means it can be the public option, but called &#8220;co-ops&#8221; or something else instead, to do better politically.)</p>
<p>The challenges remain not to lose public and more-sensible Dem and GOP support for whatever is worked out, as well as rein in the most loony of the lib Dems, especially in the House.  So far, the record is of failure, and though they&#39;re currently dysfunctional to the point where they still are not coherent, the Dems might calm down, grow up, set priorities, and actually get legislation done.</p>
<p>And of course, if they continue to fail, they can continue to blame Sarah Palin, etc, at their continued loss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JSpencer</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47443/prospects-for-public-option-are-looking-better-and-better/comment-page-1/#comment-217364</link>
		<dc:creator>JSpencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=47443#comment-217364</guid>
		<description>CO, imagine what those poll numbers might reflect if the republicans were actually engaged in a cooperative effort to help generate sound legislation (which is what the public wants), instead of assisting with disinformation and creating (the usual) obstruction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CO, imagine what those poll numbers might reflect if the republicans were actually engaged in a cooperative effort to help generate sound legislation (which is what the public wants), instead of assisting with disinformation and creating (the usual) obstruction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: casualobserver</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47443/prospects-for-public-option-are-looking-better-and-better/comment-page-1/#comment-217357</link>
		<dc:creator>casualobserver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=47443#comment-217357</guid>
		<description>&quot;Do you mostly support or mostly oppose the changes to the health care system proposed by Barack Obama, or don&#039;t you know enough about them yet to say?&quot;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Check this question out at &lt;A href=&quot;http://pollingreport.com/&quot; rel=nofollow rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;pollingreport.com&lt;/A&gt;. After 5 months&#039; worth of your incessant handwringing over Republicans, half the country still doesn&#039;t know what the hell you are talking about when it comes to healthcare reform.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;If you really want to know where the problem lies, the answer is looking back at the collective you in the mirror.&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Do you mostly support or mostly oppose the changes to the health care system proposed by Barack Obama, or don&#39;t you know enough about them yet to say?&#8221;</p>
<p>Check this question out at <a href="http://pollingreport.com/" rel=nofollow rel="nofollow">pollingreport.com</a>. After 5 months&#39; worth of your incessant handwringing over Republicans, half the country still doesn&#39;t know what the hell you are talking about when it comes to healthcare reform.</p>
<p>If you really want to know where the problem lies, the answer is looking back at the collective you in the mirror.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JSpencer</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47443/prospects-for-public-option-are-looking-better-and-better/comment-page-1/#comment-217354</link>
		<dc:creator>JSpencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=47443#comment-217354</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve often been a critic of Nancy Pelosi, but if she sticks to her guns re: the public option, then her stock with me will take a jump. That said, I wish I could be more optimistic about the chances for worthwhile healthcare reform. When one party has decided that any actual governing should take a back seat to it&#039;s struggle to regain power, then what hope is there for worthwhile legisation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve often been a critic of Nancy Pelosi, but if she sticks to her guns re: the public option, then her stock with me will take a jump. That said, I wish I could be more optimistic about the chances for worthwhile healthcare reform. When one party has decided that any actual governing should take a back seat to it&#39;s struggle to regain power, then what hope is there for worthwhile legisation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomDegan</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47443/prospects-for-public-option-are-looking-better-and-better/comment-page-1/#comment-217343</link>
		<dc:creator>TomDegan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=47443#comment-217343</guid>
		<description>Hey, Democrats! Although I left your silly party over a decade ago, my heart is still essentially with your platform and agenda. That being said, I would ask all of you to think of me as Dr. Degan, your loving and trusted family veterinarian. After a complete and thorough examination of your beloved pets, it grieves me to offer you this final diagnosis:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your Blue Dogs must be put to sleep.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let&#039;s stop kidding ourselves and face some serious and uncomfortable facts here, okay? Any chance of serious health care reform is about as dead as the nails the GOP has spent the last nine years hammering into their own coffin. And the biggest irony? It was killed by a coalition of &quot;Conservative Democrats&quot; - or DINOs: Democrats In Name Only - which begs the musical question: With donkeys like these, who the hell needs elephants?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tomdegan.blogspot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.tomdegan.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tom Degan&lt;br&gt;Goshen, NY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Democrats! Although I left your silly party over a decade ago, my heart is still essentially with your platform and agenda. That being said, I would ask all of you to think of me as Dr. Degan, your loving and trusted family veterinarian. After a complete and thorough examination of your beloved pets, it grieves me to offer you this final diagnosis:</p>
<p>Your Blue Dogs must be put to sleep.</p>
<p>Let&#39;s stop kidding ourselves and face some serious and uncomfortable facts here, okay? Any chance of serious health care reform is about as dead as the nails the GOP has spent the last nine years hammering into their own coffin. And the biggest irony? It was killed by a coalition of &#8220;Conservative Democrats&#8221; &#8211; or DINOs: Democrats In Name Only &#8211; which begs the musical question: With donkeys like these, who the hell needs elephants?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tomdegan.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.tomdegan.blogspot.com</a> </p>
<p>Tom Degan<br />Goshen, NY</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leonidas</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47443/prospects-for-public-option-are-looking-better-and-better/comment-page-1/#comment-217298</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonidas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 03:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=47443#comment-217298</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; Go Nancy! If there&#039;s one thing we&#039;ve been short on in this reform effort, it&#039;s intransigence. You are a skilled legislatrix indeed.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You made me spew Pepsi on my keyboard you evil man!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> Go Nancy! If there&#39;s one thing we&#39;ve been short on in this reform effort, it&#39;s intransigence. You are a skilled legislatrix indeed.</p></blockquote>
<p>You made me spew Pepsi on my keyboard you evil man!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr J</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47443/prospects-for-public-option-are-looking-better-and-better/comment-page-1/#comment-217286</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 03:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=47443#comment-217286</guid>
		<description>Go Nancy!  If there&#039;s one thing we&#039;ve been short on in this reform effort, it&#039;s intransigence.  You are a skilled legislatrix indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go Nancy!  If there&#39;s one thing we&#39;ve been short on in this reform effort, it&#39;s intransigence.  You are a skilled legislatrix indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kathykattenburg</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47443/prospects-for-public-option-are-looking-better-and-better/comment-page-1/#comment-217259</link>
		<dc:creator>kathykattenburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=47443#comment-217259</guid>
		<description>I should have made it more clear; I really was only referring to the House when I said the prospects were looking better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should have made it more clear; I really was only referring to the House when I said the prospects were looking better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreenDreams</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47443/prospects-for-public-option-are-looking-better-and-better/comment-page-1/#comment-217258</link>
		<dc:creator>GreenDreams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=47443#comment-217258</guid>
		<description>Of course I&#039;m with shannonlee and Kathy on this. Single payer would be optimal, a truly open to all public option is acceptable. To ProfElwood&#039;s point, sadly we cannot even talk about true cost savings outside those possible through cutting administrative costs (like one standardized claim form, no money for lobbying, sales, marketing or &quot;product development&quot;, not to mention extreme executive pay). Waste and fraud can be controlled somewhat I suppose. But ultimately we will need to deal with the demographic problem of an aging population. Right now, we can&#039;t even talk about it (&quot;death panels!&quot;), so we&#039;re trying to fix a problem that, ironically, afflicts the young and middle aged Americans, namely the scourge of private insurance with its denials, rescission, pre-existing conditions and &quot;job lock&quot;, which is thought to reduce productivity and entrepreneurialism by 25% (bright people who dare not leave the corporate fold to innovate or to work for smaller companies, because they&#039;d lose their insurance).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course I&#39;m with shannonlee and Kathy on this. Single payer would be optimal, a truly open to all public option is acceptable. To ProfElwood&#39;s point, sadly we cannot even talk about true cost savings outside those possible through cutting administrative costs (like one standardized claim form, no money for lobbying, sales, marketing or &#8220;product development&#8221;, not to mention extreme executive pay). Waste and fraud can be controlled somewhat I suppose. But ultimately we will need to deal with the demographic problem of an aging population. Right now, we can&#39;t even talk about it (&#8220;death panels!&#8221;), so we&#39;re trying to fix a problem that, ironically, afflicts the young and middle aged Americans, namely the scourge of private insurance with its denials, rescission, pre-existing conditions and &#8220;job lock&#8221;, which is thought to reduce productivity and entrepreneurialism by 25% (bright people who dare not leave the corporate fold to innovate or to work for smaller companies, because they&#39;d lose their insurance).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProfElwood</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47443/prospects-for-public-option-are-looking-better-and-better/comment-page-1/#comment-217246</link>
		<dc:creator>ProfElwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=47443#comment-217246</guid>
		<description>Trying to control costs through health insurance is like trying to control gas prices at gas stations. The insurance companies may be the one company that we deal with, but they aren&#039;t the main cost driver. Lawyers are an even smaller cost driver. Until politicians can ignore all of the special interests, they&#039;re &quot;solutions&quot; will cause more harm than good. Joe Wilson had the right idea, but too narrow a target.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trying to control costs through health insurance is like trying to control gas prices at gas stations. The insurance companies may be the one company that we deal with, but they aren&#39;t the main cost driver. Lawyers are an even smaller cost driver. Until politicians can ignore all of the special interests, they&#39;re &#8220;solutions&#8221; will cause more harm than good. Joe Wilson had the right idea, but too narrow a target.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shannonlee</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47443/prospects-for-public-option-are-looking-better-and-better/comment-page-1/#comment-217245</link>
		<dc:creator>shannonlee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=47443#comment-217245</guid>
		<description>You still have two groups pulling in different directions in the House and nothing in the Senate.  Health care will require reconcilation...god I hope they do it.  I for one am a very strong supporter of single payer, let alone a public option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You still have two groups pulling in different directions in the House and nothing in the Senate.  Health care will require reconcilation&#8230;god I hope they do it.  I for one am a very strong supporter of single payer, let alone a public option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Prospects for Public Option Are Looking Better and Better &#124; The Moderate Voice -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47443/prospects-for-public-option-are-looking-better-and-better/comment-page-1/#comment-217238</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Prospects for Public Option Are Looking Better and Better &#124; The Moderate Voice -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=47443#comment-217238</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Lynn Woolsey and Lucky Liberal. Lucky Liberal said: Prospects for Public Option Are Looking Better and Better http://bit.ly/1y6yea (via @lynnwoolsey) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Lynn Woolsey and Lucky Liberal. Lucky Liberal said: Prospects for Public Option Are Looking Better and Better <a href="http://bit.ly/1y6yea" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/1y6yea</a> (via @lynnwoolsey) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

