<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Overexposed? CNN Poll Says No</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/47390/obama-overexposed-cnn-poll-says-no/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47390/obama-overexposed-cnn-poll-says-no/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:05:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: VeratheGun</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47390/obama-overexposed-cnn-poll-says-no/comment-page-1/#comment-217175</link>
		<dc:creator>VeratheGun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=47390#comment-217175</guid>
		<description>&quot;Scraping the barrel bottom again to try to deny reality only makes people look even more pathetic.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How prescient!  I feel the same way about many of the regular posters around here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Scraping the barrel bottom again to try to deny reality only makes people look even more pathetic.&#8221;</p>
<p>How prescient!  I feel the same way about many of the regular posters around here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leonidas</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47390/obama-overexposed-cnn-poll-says-no/comment-page-1/#comment-217122</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonidas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=47390#comment-217122</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; Leonidas,&lt;br&gt;Are you implying that the number of appearances that these 1000 people have seen is significantly different than what the average American has seen?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I somehow doubt that average Americans take the time to watch every single appearance and speech and press release put out by the administration. However, the Media does have that opportunity which is probably why (along with the demands of a 24 hour news program) they are talking about overexposure. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s a case of the media making the story instead of reporting the story.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No I&#039;m not implying that these folk have seen more or less of him than the average American, I&#039;m simply wondering how many times they have actually watched him.  If they aren&#039;t watching him overexposure isn&#039;t an issue, at least unless they are peeved at him for interrupting their favorite programs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> Leonidas,<br />Are you implying that the number of appearances that these 1000 people have seen is significantly different than what the average American has seen?</p>
<p>I somehow doubt that average Americans take the time to watch every single appearance and speech and press release put out by the administration. However, the Media does have that opportunity which is probably why (along with the demands of a 24 hour news program) they are talking about overexposure. </p>
<p>It&#39;s a case of the media making the story instead of reporting the story.</p></blockquote>
<p>No I&#39;m not implying that these folk have seen more or less of him than the average American, I&#39;m simply wondering how many times they have actually watched him.  If they aren&#39;t watching him overexposure isn&#39;t an issue, at least unless they are peeved at him for interrupting their favorite programs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roro80</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47390/obama-overexposed-cnn-poll-says-no/comment-page-1/#comment-217113</link>
		<dc:creator>roro80</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=47390#comment-217113</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s possible that those who think he&#039;s overexposed either don&#039;t like him or just aren&#039;t interested in politics.  I can imagine that if you really enjoy seeing celebrities being pretty and funny on Letterman, listening to politics all night on Letterman was probably annoying.  I generally enjoy politics, and I personally want to know what&#039;s going on from the Pres&#039;s point of view, so I don&#039;t think he&#039;s overexposed.  I also think GreenDreams&#039; assessment that a political climate where analysts spend 24 hours a day talking politics, where our politicians have become celebrity gossip makers, and where so many people spend their days in front of a computer or TV -- this sort of climate is conducive to having more direct interaction with the executive in charge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s possible that those who think he&#39;s overexposed either don&#39;t like him or just aren&#39;t interested in politics.  I can imagine that if you really enjoy seeing celebrities being pretty and funny on Letterman, listening to politics all night on Letterman was probably annoying.  I generally enjoy politics, and I personally want to know what&#39;s going on from the Pres&#39;s point of view, so I don&#39;t think he&#39;s overexposed.  I also think GreenDreams&#39; assessment that a political climate where analysts spend 24 hours a day talking politics, where our politicians have become celebrity gossip makers, and where so many people spend their days in front of a computer or TV &#8212; this sort of climate is conducive to having more direct interaction with the executive in charge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreenDreams</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47390/obama-overexposed-cnn-poll-says-no/comment-page-1/#comment-217073</link>
		<dc:creator>GreenDreams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=47390#comment-217073</guid>
		<description>The political landscape has changed. With the &quot;24 hour news cycle&quot; and the extremely mouthy opposition of the likes of Beck, O&#039;Really, Limbaugh and Hannity, plus the non-&#039;media&#039; mouthpieces Steele, Cheney and Palin, the public is deluged with opinion and &quot;analysis&quot;. If the president wants to even the score, he&#039;s the best advocate for his own vision. Plus, unlike Bush who feared exposure for good reason, Obama is likable and smart and pretty darn conversant with the English language.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And as tidbits says, the focus keeps wandering off into the sideshow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The political landscape has changed. With the &#8220;24 hour news cycle&#8221; and the extremely mouthy opposition of the likes of Beck, O&#39;Really, Limbaugh and Hannity, plus the non-&#39;media&#39; mouthpieces Steele, Cheney and Palin, the public is deluged with opinion and &#8220;analysis&#8221;. If the president wants to even the score, he&#39;s the best advocate for his own vision. Plus, unlike Bush who feared exposure for good reason, Obama is likable and smart and pretty darn conversant with the English language.</p>
<p>And as tidbits says, the focus keeps wandering off into the sideshow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47390/obama-overexposed-cnn-poll-says-no/comment-page-1/#comment-217042</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=47390#comment-217042</guid>
		<description>Of course he is over-exposed, and he is bringing his campaign circus on the television circuit because he and the Dems have put themselves into a desperate position currently with health care reform.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Scraping the barrel bottom again to try to deny reality only makes people look even more pathetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course he is over-exposed, and he is bringing his campaign circus on the television circuit because he and the Dems have put themselves into a desperate position currently with health care reform.</p>
<p>Scraping the barrel bottom again to try to deny reality only makes people look even more pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sparkles43</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47390/obama-overexposed-cnn-poll-says-no/comment-page-1/#comment-217025</link>
		<dc:creator>sparkles43</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=47390#comment-217025</guid>
		<description>I am amazed that people think our president can be over-exposed.  We should respect any time our president speaks to the people of our nation.   It is especially important when the issue is as vital as health care reform.  If President Obama wasn&#039;t campaigning for health care reform, the media would be complaining he isn&#039;t doing enough.  IMO the media should report the news and quit being tabloid reporters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am amazed that people think our president can be over-exposed.  We should respect any time our president speaks to the people of our nation.   It is especially important when the issue is as vital as health care reform.  If President Obama wasn&#39;t campaigning for health care reform, the media would be complaining he isn&#39;t doing enough.  IMO the media should report the news and quit being tabloid reporters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonimp9</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47390/obama-overexposed-cnn-poll-says-no/comment-page-1/#comment-217016</link>
		<dc:creator>jonimp9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=47390#comment-217016</guid>
		<description>Leonidas,&lt;br&gt;Are you implying that the number of appearances that these 1000 people have seen is significantly different than what the average American has seen?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I somehow doubt that average Americans take the time to watch every single appearance and speech and press release put out by the administration. However, the Media does have that opportunity which is probably why (along with the demands of a 24 hour news program) they are talking about overexposure. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s a case of the media making the story instead of reporting the story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leonidas,<br />Are you implying that the number of appearances that these 1000 people have seen is significantly different than what the average American has seen?</p>
<p>I somehow doubt that average Americans take the time to watch every single appearance and speech and press release put out by the administration. However, the Media does have that opportunity which is probably why (along with the demands of a 24 hour news program) they are talking about overexposure. </p>
<p>It&#39;s a case of the media making the story instead of reporting the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tidbits</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47390/obama-overexposed-cnn-poll-says-no/comment-page-1/#comment-217008</link>
		<dc:creator>tidbits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=47390#comment-217008</guid>
		<description>The real issue is why we are continually distracted by these side show issues like &quot;over-exposure&quot; to the detriment of substance.  A few of examples if I may.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1.  Prior to the summer recess, Obama held a press conference.  In it he displayed, in my opinion, a generally weak understanding of the health care debate taking place in Congress.  Result - we, as a nation, spent the next week or longer talking about the cop and the professor, culminating with a Rose Garden beer toast.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2.  During Obama&#039;s recent address to the joint session Obama endorsed some very controversial aspects of health care including mandates (contrary to his campaign promise) and public option.  For more than a week after the speech we heard only two words spoken that evening, and not by Obama, &quot;You lie.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3.  This past weekend Obama appeared on numerous television shows.  During one he exposed a lack of knowledge on the substance of one of the bills moving through Congress, specifically whether it included a tax.  So what do we hear about?  That he snubbed Fox and whether or not he is over-exposed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The obsession with the carnival sideshow may attract eyeballs and ears for media marketing purposes but it does not advance the debate.  It isn&#039;t about long form birth certificates or teleprompters or rude congressmen or tv time.  It&#039;s about substance, and that is being pushed to the background for newsertainment purposes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Final point.  One reason I like TMV is that one can choose to be educated and comment on substance or float to a side issue from time to time.  Both are available.  Many other sites, and much of the media, are carnival sideshow all the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real issue is why we are continually distracted by these side show issues like &#8220;over-exposure&#8221; to the detriment of substance.  A few of examples if I may.</p>
<p>1.  Prior to the summer recess, Obama held a press conference.  In it he displayed, in my opinion, a generally weak understanding of the health care debate taking place in Congress.  Result &#8211; we, as a nation, spent the next week or longer talking about the cop and the professor, culminating with a Rose Garden beer toast.</p>
<p>2.  During Obama&#39;s recent address to the joint session Obama endorsed some very controversial aspects of health care including mandates (contrary to his campaign promise) and public option.  For more than a week after the speech we heard only two words spoken that evening, and not by Obama, &#8220;You lie.&#8221;</p>
<p>3.  This past weekend Obama appeared on numerous television shows.  During one he exposed a lack of knowledge on the substance of one of the bills moving through Congress, specifically whether it included a tax.  So what do we hear about?  That he snubbed Fox and whether or not he is over-exposed.</p>
<p>The obsession with the carnival sideshow may attract eyeballs and ears for media marketing purposes but it does not advance the debate.  It isn&#39;t about long form birth certificates or teleprompters or rude congressmen or tv time.  It&#39;s about substance, and that is being pushed to the background for newsertainment purposes.</p>
<p>Final point.  One reason I like TMV is that one can choose to be educated and comment on substance or float to a side issue from time to time.  Both are available.  Many other sites, and much of the media, are carnival sideshow all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Obama Overexposed? CNN Poll Says No &#124; The Moderate Voice -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47390/obama-overexposed-cnn-poll-says-no/comment-page-1/#comment-217001</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Obama Overexposed? CNN Poll Says No &#124; The Moderate Voice -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=47390#comment-217001</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by TMV. TMV said: Obama Overexposed? CNN Poll Says No: In the course of two days, President Barack Obama appeared on a slew of ne.. http://bit.ly/sFBfg [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by TMV. TMV said: Obama Overexposed? CNN Poll Says No: In the course of two days, President Barack Obama appeared on a slew of ne.. <a href="http://bit.ly/sFBfg" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/sFBfg</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Father_Time</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47390/obama-overexposed-cnn-poll-says-no/comment-page-1/#comment-216993</link>
		<dc:creator>Father_Time</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=47390#comment-216993</guid>
		<description>Its better he speaks for himself rather than the corporate media mouthpieces. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Besides, would you rather see and hear Palin everyday?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its better he speaks for himself rather than the corporate media mouthpieces. </p>
<p>Besides, would you rather see and hear Palin everyday?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leonidas</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/47390/obama-overexposed-cnn-poll-says-no/comment-page-1/#comment-216974</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonidas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 07:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=47390#comment-216974</guid>
		<description>The survey was conducted by telephone with 1,005 adult Americans.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wonder what the average number of times those polled have seen Obama speak?  I mean if you are not watching him you likely will not be overexpossed will you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The survey was conducted by telephone with 1,005 adult Americans.</p>
<p>Wonder what the average number of times those polled have seen Obama speak?  I mean if you are not watching him you likely will not be overexpossed will you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

