
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ACORN&#8217;s Fed Funding Loss A Drop In The Bucket?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/46832/acorns-fed-funding-loss-a-drop-in-the-bucket/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/46832/acorns-fed-funding-loss-a-drop-in-the-bucket/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 21:54:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Defund ACORN Act &#124; Tweet The Press</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/46832/acorns-fed-funding-loss-a-drop-in-the-bucket/comment-page-1/#comment-216616</link>
		<dc:creator>Defund ACORN Act &#124; Tweet The Press</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 06:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=46832#comment-216616</guid>
		<description>[...] ACORN&#8217;s Fed Funding Loss A Drop In The Bucket? (themoderatevoice.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ACORN&#8217;s Fed Funding Loss A Drop In The Bucket? (themoderatevoice.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plantsmantx</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/46832/acorns-fed-funding-loss-a-drop-in-the-bucket/comment-page-1/#comment-216185</link>
		<dc:creator>Plantsmantx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=46832#comment-216185</guid>
		<description>&quot; who is more of an icon-shattering crusader than staunch conservative as some would have us believe.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Aren&#039;t these the same people who called up Planned Parenthood offices and told PP workers that they wanted to make a donation, and have it earmarked for the abortion of black fetuses? Not a stanuch conservative?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;James O’Keefe, one of the two filmmakers, said he went after ACORN because it registers minorities likely to vote against Republicans: &quot;Politicians are getting elected single-handedly due to this organization,&quot; O’Keefe told The Washington Post. &quot;No one was holding this organization accountable.&quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;..not a staunch conservative?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A graduate of Morton Blackwell&#039;s Leadership Institute...not a staunch conservative?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; who is more of an icon-shattering crusader than staunch conservative as some would have us believe.&#8221;</p>
<p>Aren&#39;t these the same people who called up Planned Parenthood offices and told PP workers that they wanted to make a donation, and have it earmarked for the abortion of black fetuses? Not a stanuch conservative?</p>
<p>&#8220;James O’Keefe, one of the two filmmakers, said he went after ACORN because it registers minorities likely to vote against Republicans: &#8220;Politicians are getting elected single-handedly due to this organization,&#8221; O’Keefe told The Washington Post. &#8220;No one was holding this organization accountable.&#8221; </p>
<p>..not a staunch conservative?</p>
<p>A graduate of Morton Blackwell&#39;s Leadership Institute&#8230;not a staunch conservative?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merkin_Muffley</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/46832/acorns-fed-funding-loss-a-drop-in-the-bucket/comment-page-1/#comment-215954</link>
		<dc:creator>Merkin_Muffley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 06:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=46832#comment-215954</guid>
		<description>It goes to show you, if you are going to steal, steal big.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I love it &quot;The industry that keeps us safe..&quot; -- hadn&#039;t seen that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We have the largest defense budget in the world, larger than all others combined, and we have to hire private contractors to protect our embassies..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It goes to show you, if you are going to steal, steal big.</p>
<p>I love it &#8220;The industry that keeps us safe..&#8221; &#8212; hadn&#39;t seen that.</p>
<p>We have the largest defense budget in the world, larger than all others combined, and we have to hire private contractors to protect our embassies..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveK</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/46832/acorns-fed-funding-loss-a-drop-in-the-bucket/comment-page-1/#comment-215948</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 05:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=46832#comment-215948</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Merkin_Muffley wrote: &quot;Anyway now that Congress has moved so boldly on a government contractor who offered advice to pretend criminals, I am interested to see what happens now to say, government contractors who killed people, sold weapons on the black market in Iraq, stole billions.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;Good point Merkin_Muffley. Juan Williams (for once) asked that of S. Hannity on F News just the other day...&lt;a href=&quot;http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/juan-williams-why-dont-you-go-after-blackw&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Juan Williams: Why don&#039;t you go after Blackwater? Why don&#039;t you go after the defense industry that rips off our country?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Guess what Hannity&#039;s reply was?&lt;blockquote&gt;WILLIAMS: But I will say something to you. You&#039;re a big guy. How come you&#039;re not going after people who take billions of dollars? Why don&#039;t you go after Blackwater? Why don&#039;t you go after the defense industry that rips off our country? You know, these are people...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;HANNITY: The industry that keeps us safe.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;WILLIAMS: Why don&#039;t you go after Wall Street?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;HANNITY: Look, how about we go after the corrupt radicals in the Obama administration?&lt;/blockquote&gt;Surprised?.. I hope not. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Merkin_Muffley wrote: &#8220;Anyway now that Congress has moved so boldly on a government contractor who offered advice to pretend criminals, I am interested to see what happens now to say, government contractors who killed people, sold weapons on the black market in Iraq, stole billions.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Good point Merkin_Muffley. Juan Williams (for once) asked that of S. Hannity on F News just the other day&#8230;<a href="http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/juan-williams-why-dont-you-go-after-blackw" rel="nofollow">Juan Williams: Why don&#39;t you go after Blackwater? Why don&#39;t you go after the defense industry that rips off our country?</a></p>
<p>Guess what Hannity&#39;s reply was?<br />
<blockquote>WILLIAMS: But I will say something to you. You&#39;re a big guy. How come you&#39;re not going after people who take billions of dollars? Why don&#39;t you go after Blackwater? Why don&#39;t you go after the defense industry that rips off our country? You know, these are people&#8230;</p>
<p>HANNITY: The industry that keeps us safe.</p>
<p>WILLIAMS: Why don&#39;t you go after Wall Street?</p>
<p>HANNITY: Look, how about we go after the corrupt radicals in the Obama administration?</p></blockquote>
<p>Surprised?.. I hope not. <img src='http://themoderatevoice.com/wordpress-engine/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreenDreams</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/46832/acorns-fed-funding-loss-a-drop-in-the-bucket/comment-page-1/#comment-215945</link>
		<dc:creator>GreenDreams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 05:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=46832#comment-215945</guid>
		<description>no telling what orson is talking about. budget has increased steadily for this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Some faith-based leaders voiced support on Monday for President Obama’s budget proposal, applauding it for expanding program funding for low-income and poor Americans.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no telling what orson is talking about. budget has increased steadily for this.</p>
<p>&#8220;Some faith-based leaders voiced support on Monday for President Obama’s budget proposal, applauding it for expanding program funding for low-income and poor Americans.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merkin_Muffley</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/46832/acorns-fed-funding-loss-a-drop-in-the-bucket/comment-page-1/#comment-215940</link>
		<dc:creator>Merkin_Muffley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 05:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=46832#comment-215940</guid>
		<description>The conservative attacks on ACORN really started in earnest  to divert attention from that group in California that was found to be changing voter registration form party affiliations from Democratic to Republican. It was proven to be a company wide scam and the head of the company went to jail.  The group (a private company) was Positive Majority or something like that.  Mainly a case of projection, if we do it they must also do it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ACORN hires the people it helps.  I for one am not too surprised to learn that they would have such an attitude.  Also not included in Fox&#039;s report is that the pimp &amp; ho were kicked out of more of ACORN&#039;s offices than they were welcomed in.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyway now that Congress has moved so boldly on a government contractor who offered advice to pretend criminals, I am interested to see what happens now to say, government contractors who killed people, sold weapons on the black market in Iraq, stole billions.  No, I am dreaming, we renewed their contracts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Black - something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The conservative attacks on ACORN really started in earnest  to divert attention from that group in California that was found to be changing voter registration form party affiliations from Democratic to Republican. It was proven to be a company wide scam and the head of the company went to jail.  The group (a private company) was Positive Majority or something like that.  Mainly a case of projection, if we do it they must also do it.</p>
<p>ACORN hires the people it helps.  I for one am not too surprised to learn that they would have such an attitude.  Also not included in Fox&#39;s report is that the pimp &#038; ho were kicked out of more of ACORN&#39;s offices than they were welcomed in.</p>
<p>Anyway now that Congress has moved so boldly on a government contractor who offered advice to pretend criminals, I am interested to see what happens now to say, government contractors who killed people, sold weapons on the black market in Iraq, stole billions.  No, I am dreaming, we renewed their contracts.</p>
<p>Black &#8211; something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orsonbuggeigh</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/46832/acorns-fed-funding-loss-a-drop-in-the-bucket/comment-page-1/#comment-215907</link>
		<dc:creator>orsonbuggeigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 00:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=46832#comment-215907</guid>
		<description>The better run charities often exist, but there are ideological problems about allowing them to serve the same client populations.  I am, of course, referring to religious charities.  These organizations often have very good records of putting more of the donations into mission than administration, and providing competent, quality services.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Organizations like Catholic charities were willing to provide adoption services and the like until the law suits from various socially progressive persons who wanted to force the Catholics to provide services which conflict with their religious views.  Catholics have in some instances decided to stop providing social services when they were sued to demand that they provide adoption services to homosexual couples, or birth control.  The progressives don&#039;t seem to have been too concerned about the ending of social services to the poor when the providers were certain religious groups.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;President Bush wanted to try to facilitate this, but, of course, it was seen as unacceptable for religious organizations to receive the money, since this was a conflict of the separation of church and state.  I agree, it would be nice to see the Republicans do something to provide for the needy, but in fairness, they have tried - and been shot down because of the religious issue.  I don&#039;t think we would be as well served trying to re-invent the wheel as we would be in allowing effective non-profit groups to serve the needy.  However, unless we get some sort of legal exemption from the conflict of church and state issue, I just don&#039;t see it happening easily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The better run charities often exist, but there are ideological problems about allowing them to serve the same client populations.  I am, of course, referring to religious charities.  These organizations often have very good records of putting more of the donations into mission than administration, and providing competent, quality services.  </p>
<p>Organizations like Catholic charities were willing to provide adoption services and the like until the law suits from various socially progressive persons who wanted to force the Catholics to provide services which conflict with their religious views.  Catholics have in some instances decided to stop providing social services when they were sued to demand that they provide adoption services to homosexual couples, or birth control.  The progressives don&#39;t seem to have been too concerned about the ending of social services to the poor when the providers were certain religious groups.  </p>
<p>President Bush wanted to try to facilitate this, but, of course, it was seen as unacceptable for religious organizations to receive the money, since this was a conflict of the separation of church and state.  I agree, it would be nice to see the Republicans do something to provide for the needy, but in fairness, they have tried &#8211; and been shot down because of the religious issue.  I don&#39;t think we would be as well served trying to re-invent the wheel as we would be in allowing effective non-profit groups to serve the needy.  However, unless we get some sort of legal exemption from the conflict of church and state issue, I just don&#39;t see it happening easily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisWWW</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/46832/acorns-fed-funding-loss-a-drop-in-the-bucket/comment-page-1/#comment-215900</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisWWW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 00:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=46832#comment-215900</guid>
		<description>Once ACORN is dismantled, I wonder if Republicans will actually use some of their energy positively and replace it with their own better run charities. Maybe we can get DLS on the front lines helping impoverished minorities?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once ACORN is dismantled, I wonder if Republicans will actually use some of their energy positively and replace it with their own better run charities. Maybe we can get DLS on the front lines helping impoverished minorities?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention ACORN’s Fed Funding Loss A Drop In The Bucket? &#124; The Moderate Voice -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/46832/acorns-fed-funding-loss-a-drop-in-the-bucket/comment-page-1/#comment-215894</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention ACORN’s Fed Funding Loss A Drop In The Bucket? &#124; The Moderate Voice -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 22:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=46832#comment-215894</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by TMV. TMV said: ACORN’s Fed Funding Loss A Drop In The Bucket?: Frankly, my dear, I didn’t give a damn about ACORN’s.. http://bit.ly/1vVYRh [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by TMV. TMV said: ACORN’s Fed Funding Loss A Drop In The Bucket?: Frankly, my dear, I didn’t give a damn about ACORN’s.. <a href="http://bit.ly/1vVYRh" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/1vVYRh</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

