An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

An Economist Speaks

For a long time I’ve been confused about what passes for economic reporting these days. The reports of late have all been saying the recession has ended. Yet they all invariably add that most Americans (sometimes referred to collectively as “Main Street”) will not see any personal improvement for many months or even years. Indeed, it seems to most on Main Street that things are actually getting worse because of more job losses, more foreclosures than new home sales, higher poverty rates, much less available personal credit, etc.

The answer to this apparent contradiction, I’ve finally realized, is that the good news we’ve been inundated with of late has come from “experts,” people who supposedly know better than the folks actually suffering in this hyped recovery. My next realization was that none of these supposed experts has credentials that anyone with an ounce of sense would take seriously.

What do you have to do to claim the title of economist, for example? A lawyer, a doctor, most other professionals, need a license and must past tests to claim this title. But anyone can claim to be an economist. Me, you, the kid who delivers the morning paper, anyone.

Sure, most people who do make this claim nowadays have a lot of a certain kind of education. But this doesn’t enable them to understand the real circumstances in which other people are living any more than years studying oceanography gives one real insights into how it feels to be a fish. And since the unemployment rate among economists is a fraction of the national average, the number of homes they have lost via foreclosure is minimal, and they aren’t regulars at the local food pantry or welfare office, it’s fair to say their descriptions of real world economic conditions are about as soundly based as a theologan’s descriptions of conditions existing in heaven and hell.

And then there’s those analysts — you know, the people whose expectations are always being beaten. What are their qualifications when it comes to describing the present state of our economy and its likely future prospects? Does one even need a certain educational background or past success predicting things to be an analyst? Of course not. Most analysts being quoted endlessly in media are just employees of securities peddling firms.

So I’m an economist. I’m also an analyst. And by the by, my own economic analysis has been far more on the mark over the years than the folks the media is looking to at present—and if you check the site noted below, you’ll see I did this in verse.

And here’s what I say now. The Fed didn’t pull us back from the edge of the economic abyss. We fell into the abyss. We’re still falling. The economy wasn’t saved, the banks were saved. And the short-term cures our economic elite have contrived is very likely to pitch us much further into the pit without a plausible government life vest left to check the plunge.

 

http://www.wallstreetpoet.com

  • ProfElwood
    I gave up on macroeconomics when I was taught that the government can improve an economy by taxing people and then spending the money. This idea came from the concept that saving is bad, but spending is good, so forcing people spend their savings was therefore good. It took me a while to figure out where they had gone wrong, and realized that there were two basic problems with these assumptions:
    1. There was no real concept of waste. If everyone was making and buying mud pies, then the economy was thriving!
    2. It was assumed that investment was made when profits were high, so increasing profits increased investment. But anyone who has started or expanded a small business knows that it's usually done from borrowing, which requires others to be saving.

    Macroeconomics seems solidly planted in its "philosophical" stage, where it's trying to figure out how things work by looking at the past. But since it really can't make isolated experiments, it's not a science, at least, not yet.

    For instance, I've heard from many sources, that Keynesian economics (a "stimulus plan") has consistently failed everywhere that it's been tried. Part of the reason that I've come to loath both current political parties, is that they keep building on, expanding, and reusing, failures of the past.
  • michaelD
    bravo, mr. silverstein ... you have squarely hit the nail on the head. i'm frequently incensed by the talking head economists, investors and traders [traitors?] who frequent the media, championing the grand recovery. to those who claim that the recession has ended i reply: of course it has; it was replaced by the current depression.

    the rule of law was suspended years ago and has yet to be reinstated. it seems the change we sought cannot be believed in. laws seem intended to keep the general population in check and are inapplicable to the thieves and charlatans running [ruining?] what's left of our once great nation. class warfare in the form of wealth transfer is ongoing, pernicious and ominous. instead of trickle-down economics we've been thrashed with an upwards gush ... the lawyers, the banksters, the democrats and the republicans have squeezed and squeezed and squeezed. the turnips are bled white. in the place of the fourth estate we have corporate-owned and operated media outlets telling us how well off we are while our fiat currency struggles to retain a mere five percent of its value since the central bank came into existence.

    hat tip to you, sir.
  • Leonidas
    Economists seems to agree with each other about as often as Democrats and Republicans do.
  • Dave_Schuler
    And here’s what I say now. The Fed didn’t pull us back from the edge of the economic abyss. We fell into the abyss. We’re still falling. The economy wasn’t saved, the banks were saved.

    Were the banks saved or were the bankers saved? From the numbers of banks who still have "toxic assets" on their books and are believed to be insolvent, I'd say the latter.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC